Collaboration in Healthcare Through Boundary Work and Boundary Objects

Ninna Meier

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.11.3.05

Authors

Ninna Meier Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.3.05

Keywords:

Boundary Work, Boundary Objects, Micro-Interactions, Relationships, Healthcare

Abstract

This article contributes to our understanding of how boundary work is practiced in healthcare settings. Previous studies have shown how boundaries are constantly changing, multiple, and co-existing, and can also be relatively stable cognitive and social distinctions between individuals and groups. In highly specialized, knowledge-intensive organizations such as healthcare organizations, organizational, professional, and disciplinary boundaries mark the formal structure and division of work. Collaboration and coordination across these boundaries are essential to minimizing gaps in patient care, but also may be challenging to achieve in practice. By drawing on data from an ethnographic study of two hospital wards, this article investigates practices of cross-disciplinary and professional collaboration and adds to our knowledge of how this kind of boundary work is produced in context. Moreover, it adds to existing boundary literature by exploring the fast-paced, situational, micro-interactions in which boundaries are drawn, maintained, and dissolved. These mundane, brief exchanges are essential to the practice of collaboration through boundary work. I consider the implications of these findings for boundary theory and boundaries in healthcare and other related settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ninna Meier, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

Ninna Meier is a qualitative researcher who studies organization and management of healthcare work. In her PhD, she investigated clinical managerial work in different hospital units and currently holds a 3-year postdoc, in which she studies the effects of organizational interventions to enhance coherency of healthcare work.

References

Aizer, Ayal A. et al. 2013. “Marital Status and Survival in Patients With Cancer.” Journal of Clinical Oncology 31:3869-3876.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6489

Barley, Stephen R. and Pamela S. Tolbert. 1997. “Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links Between Action and Institution.” Organization Studies 18:93-117.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800106

Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Susan L. Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001

Broecker, Anne and Louise L. Bro. 2013. Leadership and Management of Emergency Patients’ Pathways [Ledelse af akutte patientforløb]. Copenhagen: KORA: Danish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research.
Google Scholar

Brown, John S. and Paul Duguid. 2001. “Knowledge and Organization.” Organizational Science 12(2):198-213.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116

Chreim, Samia et al. 2013. “Leadership as Boundary Work in Healthcare Teams.” Leadership 9(2):201-228.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715012468781

Czarniawska, Barbara. 2007. Shadowing and Other Techniques for Doing Field Studies in Modern Societies. Malmö: Liber AB.
Google Scholar

Czarniawska, Barbara. 2008a. “Alterity/Identity Interplay in Image Construction.” Pp. 49-67 in The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization, edited by D. Barry and H. Hansen. London: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200394.n8

Czarniawska, Barbara. 2008b. “Organizing: How to Study It and How to Write About It.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management 3(1):4-20.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640810870364

Danish Health and Medicines Authority. 2011. Evaluation of Health Agreements — Conclusion and Perspectives [Evaluering af sundhedsaftalerne ‒ sammenfatning og perspektivering]. Copenhagen: Danish Health and Medicines Authority.
Google Scholar

Danish Social Science Research Council. 2002. Scientific Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences. Copenhagen: Danish Social Science Research Council.
Google Scholar

Denis, Jean-Louis, Ann Langley, and Linda Rouleau. 2010. “The Practice of Leadership in the Messy World of Organizations.” Leadership 6(1):67-88.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715009354233

Dopson, Sue and Louise Fitzgerald, (eds.). 2005. Knowledge to Action. Evidence-Based Healthcare in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Dopson, Sue, Louise Fitzgerald, and Ewan Ferlie. 2008. “Understanding Change and Innovation in Healthcare Settings: Re-Conceptualizing the Active Role of Context.” Journal of Change Management 8(3/4):213-231.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010802133577

Ekstedt, Mirjam and Synnöve Ödegård. 2015. “Exploring Gaps in Cancer Care Using a Systems Safety Perspective.” Cognition, Technology & Work 17(1):5-13.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0311-1

Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science From Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48(6):718-795.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325

Gittell, Jody H. 2000. “Organizing Work to Support Relational Coordination.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 11(3):517-539.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/095851900339747

Gittell, Jody H. 2002. “Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups: Relational Coordination as a Mediator and Input Uncertainty as a Moderator of Performance Effects.” Management Science 48(11):1408-1426.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.11.1408.268

Gittell, Jody H. 2009. High Performance Healthcare: Using the Power of Relationships to Achieve Quality, Efficiency, and Resilience. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar

Gittell, Jody H., Rob Seidner, and Julian Wimbush. 2010. “A Relational Model of How High-Performance Work Systems Work.” Organization Science 21(2):490-506.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0446

Gittell, Jody H., Marjorie Godfrey, and Jill Thistlethwaite. 2012. “Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and Relational Coordination: Improving Healthcare Through Relationships.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 27(3):210-213.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2012.730564

Hernes, Tor. 2004. “Studying Composite Boundaries: A Framework of Analysis.” Human Relations 57(1):9-29.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704042712

Hinds, Pamela J. and Sara Kiesler, (eds.). 2002. Distributed Work. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2464.001.0001

Hinds, Pamela J. and Diane E. Bailey. 2003. “Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams.” Organization Science 14(6):615-632.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872

Hinds, Pamela J. and Mark Mortensen. 2005. “Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication.” Organization Science 16(3):290-307.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0122

Hinds, Pamela J. and Catherine D. Cramton. 2014. “Situated Co-Worker Familiarity: How Site Visits Transform Relationships Among Distributed Workers.” Organization Science 25(3):794-814.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0869

Hunter, Montgomery Kathryn. 1991. Doctors’ Stories: The Narrative Structure of Medical Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214726

Kellogg, Katherine C. 2009. “Operating Room: Relational Spaces and Micro-Institutional Change in Surgery.” American Journal of Sociology 115(3):657-711.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/603535

Klein, Katherine J. et al. 2006. “Dynamic Delegation: Shared, Hierarchical, and De-Individualized Leadership in Extreme Action Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 51:590-621.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.4.590

Lamont, Michèle and Virág Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28:167-195.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107

Lawrence, Thomas, Roy Suddaby, and Bernard Leca. 2010. “Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization.” Journal of Management Inquiry 20(1):52-58.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222

Long, Janet C., Frances C. Cunningham, and Jeffrey Braithwaite. 2013. “Bridges, Brokers, and Boundary Spanners in Collaborative Networks: A Systematic Review.” BMC Health Services Research 13(158):1-13.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-158

March, James G. and Herbert A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar

Miller, Daniel et al. 2012. “Improving Teamwork and Communication in Trauma Care Through in Situ Simulations.” Academic Emergency Medicine 19(5):608-612.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01354.x

Mintzberg, Henry. 2011. Managing. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Google Scholar

Mizrachi, Nissim and Judith T. Shuval. 2005. “Between Formal and Enacted Policy: Changing the Contours of Boundaries.” Social Science & Medicine 60(7):1649-1660.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.016

Montgomery, Kathryn. 2006. How Doctors Think: Clinical Judgment and the Practice of Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Mørk, Bjørn E. et al. 2012. “Changing Practice Through Boundary Organizing: A Case From Medical R&D.” Human Relations 65(2):263-288.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711429192

Nemeth, Christopher et al. 2008. “Minding the Gaps: Creating Resilience in Healthcare.” Pp. 1-13 in Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches, edited by K. Henriksen et al. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Google Scholar

Pachucki, Mark A., Sabrina Pendergrass, and Michèle Lamont. 2007. “Boundary Processes: Recent Theoretical Developments and New Contributions.” Poetics 35(6):331-351.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2007.10.001

Pawson, Ray and Nick Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Robbins, Philip and Murat Ayede, (eds.). 2009. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Robertson-Steel, Iain. 2006. “Evolution of Triage Systems.” Emergency Medicine Journal: EMJ 23(2):154-155.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2005.030270

Saultz , John W. and Jennifer Lochner. 2005. “Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Care Outcomes: A Critical Review.” Annals of Family Medicine 3(2):159-166.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.285

Scott , Richard W. 2008. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Google Scholar

Siemsen, Inger et al. 2012. “Factors That Impact on the Safety of Patient Handovers: An Interview Study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 40(5):439-448.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812453889

Star, Susan L. 2010. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology & Human Values 35(5):601-617.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624

Star, Susan L. and James R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations,’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19(3):387-420.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001

Strauss, Anselm et al. 1997. Social Organization of Medical Work. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, Rutgers.
Google Scholar

Struijs, Jeroen N. et al. 2006. “Comorbidity in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Impact on Medical Healthcare Utilization.” BMC Health Services Research 6(84). Retrieved June 06, 2015: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1534031/
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-84

Tavory, Iddo and Stefan Timmermans. 2014. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226180458.001.0001

Van de Ven, Andrew H., Andre L. Delbecq, and Richard Koenig, Jr. 1976. “Determinants of Coordination Modes Within Organizations.” American Sociological Review 41(2):322-338.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094477

Weick, Karl E. and Karlene H. Roberts. 1993. “Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38(3):357-381.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393372

Yin, Robert K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Google Scholar

Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1991. The Fine Line: Making Distinctions in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1999. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Zietsma, Charlene and Thomas Lawrence. 2010. “Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work.” Administrative Science Quarterly 55(2):189-222.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189