“Physically We Are Apart, Mentally We Are Not.” Creating a Shared Space and a Sense of Belonging in Long-Distance Relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.4.05Keywords:
Long-Distance Relationships, Boundary Placement, Boundary Transcendence, Space, Grounded Theory Methods, Symbolic InteractionismAbstract
As couples tend to be referred to as “being together,” long-distance partners, who spend most of their time apart and in diff erent spaces, might face a challenge delineating and validating their relationship. Through in-depth interviews with 20 couples in a long-distance relationship, this study explores how long-distance partners linguistically and symbolically mark the boundaries of their relationship, and also transcend any real or perceived gaps between distance and closeness in the process. While they rarely shared a physical space, my participants created joint socio-mental spaces, which enhanced their sense of belonging and helped to expand defi nitions of intimacy and space.
Downloads
References
Ben-Ze’ev, Aaron. 2004. Love Online: Emotions on the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489785
Berger, Peter and Hansfried Kellner. 1964. “Marriage and the Construction of Reality: An Exercise in the Microsociology of Knowledge.” Diogenes 12:1-24.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216401204601
Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliff s, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Brekhus, Wayne. 1996. “Social Marking and the Mental Coloring of Identity: Sexual Identity Construction and Maintenance in the United States.” Sociological Forum 11:497-522.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408390
Chayko, Mary. 2002. Connecting: How We Form Social Bonds and Communities in the Internet Age. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Chayko, Mary. 2008. Portable Communities: The Social Dynamics of Online and Mobile Connectedness. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Dainton, Marianne and Brooks Aylor. 2001. “A Relational Uncertainty Analysis of Jealousy, Trust, and Maintenance in Long-Distance Versus Geographically Close Relationships.” Communication Quarterly 49(2):172-188.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370109385624
Draucker, Claire B. et al. 2007. “Theoretical Sampling and Category Development in Grounded Theory.” Qualitative Health Research 17:1137-1148.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308450
Gerstel, Naomi and Harriet Gross. 1984. Commuter Marriage: A Study of Work and Family. New York: The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. New York: Sociology Press.
Google Scholar
Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. 2006. “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment With Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18:59-82.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Guldner, Gregory T. 1996. “Long-Distance Romantic Relationships: Prevalence and Separation-Related Symptoms in College Students.” Journal of College Student Development 37:289-296.
Google Scholar
Guldner, Gregory T. and Clifford H. Swensen. 1995. “Time Spent Together and Relationship Quality: Long-Distance Relationships as a Test Case.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 13:313-320.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407595122010
Hill, Susan et al. 2009. “Comparing Intimacy Levels of Long-Distance and Geographically Close Dating Relationships.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 08, San Francisco, U.S.A.
Google Scholar
Johnson, Amy et al. 2007. “College Students’ Use of Email to Maintain Long-Distance and Geographically Close Interpersonal Relationships.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, May 23, San Francisco, U.S.A.
Google Scholar
Johnson, Amy et al. 2008. “College Students’ Use of Relational Management Strategies in Email in Long-Distance and Geographically Close Relationships.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13:381-404.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00401.x
Knox, David E. et al. 2002. “Absence Makes the Heart Grow Fonder? Long-Distance Dating Relationships Among College Students.” College Student Journal 36(3). Retrieved March 16, 2011: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCR/is_3_36/ai_95356586/
Google Scholar
LaRossa, Ralph. 2005. “Grounded Theory Methods and Qualitative Family Research.” Journal of Marriage and Family 67:837-857.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00179.x
Lyndon, John, Tamarha Pierce, and Shannon O’Regan. 1997. “Coping With Moral Commitment to Long-Distance Dating Relationships.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(1):104-113.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.104
Maguire, Katheryn C. 2007. “‘Will It Ever End?’: A (Re)Examination of Uncertainty in College Student Long-Distance Dating Relationships.” Communication Quarterly 55(4):415-432.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701658002
Maguire, Katheryn C. and Terry A. Kinney. 2010. “When Distance is Problematic: Communication, Coping, and Relational Satisfaction in Female College Students’ Long-Distance Dating Relationships.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 38:27-46.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880903483573
Malterud, Kirsti. 2001. “Qualitative Research: Standards, Challenges, and Guidelines.” The Lancet 358:483-488.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6
Nippert-Eng, Christena E. 1996. Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries Through Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226581477.001.0001
Richardson, Laurel. 1988. “Secrecy and Status: The Social Construction of Forbidden Relationships.” American Sociological Review 53:209-219.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095688
Sahlstein, Erin M. 2004. “Relating at a Distance: Negotiating Being Together and Being Apart in Long-Distance Relationships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 21:689-710.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504046115
Stafford, Laura. 2005. Maintaining Long-Distance and Cross-Residential Relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611512
Stafford, Laura and Andy J. Merolla. 2007. “Idealization, Reunions, and Stability in Long-Distance Dating Relationships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 24:37-54.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507072578
Strauss, Anselm L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842
Vaughan, Diane. 1986. Uncoupling: Turning Points in Intimate Relationships. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Winfield, Fairlee E. 1985. Commuter Marriage: Living Together, Apart. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar
Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1979. Patterns of Time in Hospital Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1981. Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1991. The Fine Line: Making Distinctions in Everyday Life. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1996. “Lumping and Splitting: Notes on Social Classification.” Sociological Forum 11:421-433.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408386
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.