Organizational Challenges in the Public Sector. A Qualitative Study of the Swedish Armed Forces and Elderly Care

Pernilla Hoke Åberg; Elisabeth Arenö; Aida Alvinius

doi:10.18778/1733-8077.17.3.02

Authors

Pernilla Hoke Åberg Swedish Defence University, Sweden
Elisabeth Arenö Swedish Defence University, Sweden
Aida Alvinius Swedish Defence University, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-4979

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.17.3.02

Keywords:

organizational challenges, public sector, military, health care, qualitative study

Abstract

Society is continuously impacted by accelerating technical and social changes that challenge individuals, organizations, and societies. This appears to lead to the emergence of negative organizational behavior patterns that impose high levels of demands on employees. Firstly, the purpose of this study is to qualitatively examine how three organizational challenges—organizational anorexia, organizational greed, and organizational narcissism—are expressed in the Swedish public sector. Secondly, the Swedish Armed Forces and the field of elderly care are compared to discover additional organizational challenges by carrying out comparisons. The sample of organizations used is described in the Methods section. The study’s main findings show that these three organizational challenges have been experienced in different ways in these organizations. A new organizational challenge has appeared, organizational temporality, describing participants’ perceptions of time when carrying out their assigned tasks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pernilla Hoke Åberg, Swedish Defence University, Sweden

Pernilla Hoke Åberg has a Bachelor of Science in social analysis (Karlstad University, Sweden). She has been researching within the fields of media framing and military sociology organizational studies.

Elisabeth Arenö, Swedish Defence University, Sweden

Elisabeth Arenö has a Bachelor of Science in social analysis (Karlstad University, Sweden). She has been researching within the fields of elderly care and organizational studies.

Aida Alvinius, Swedish Defence University, Sweden

Aida Alvinius has a Ph.D. (Karlstad University, Sweden). She is an Associate Professor and University Lecturer at the Department of Security, Strategy, and Leadership, Swedish Defence University, Karlstad and Stockholm, Sweden. She has published a number of articles, chapters in books, and research reports within the field of organization, collaboration and leadership, sociology of disasters, and military sociology.

References

Alvesson, Mats and Andre Spicer. 2010. Metaphors We Lead By: Understanding Leadership in the Real World. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840122

Alvinius, Aida. 2019. “A Gender Perspective on Teachers as Crisis Managers.” NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 27(2):125-138.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2019.1588373

Alvinius, Aida, Arita Holmberg, and Eva Johansson. 2019. “Do Military Leaders Resist Organizational Challenges?” International Journal of Resistance Studies 5(1):34-60.
Google Scholar

Alvinius Aida, Eva Johansson, and Gerry Larsson. 2016. “Negative Organizations: Antecedents of Negative Leadership?” Pp. 57-74 in Negative Leadership: International Perspectives, edited by D. Watola and D. Woycheshin. Kingston: Canadian Defence Academy Press.
Google Scholar

Alvinius, Aida, Alicia Ohlsson, and Gerry Larsson. 2020. “Organizational Challenges and Leaders’ Coping Strategies: A Qualitative Study of Swedish Military Staff Organization.” Journal of Military Studies 9(1):24-33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jms-2017-0002

Aspers, Patrik. 2011. Etnografiska metoder: att förstå och förklara samtiden [Ethnographic Methods: To Understand and Explain the Present]. Malmo: Liber.
Google Scholar

Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Brännmark, Mikael. 2012. Lean i kommuner och myndigheter: En översikt över existerande empirisk forskningslitteratur [Lean in Municipalities and Authorities—An Overview of Existing Empirical Research Literature]. Retrieved May 22, 2021 http://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A506798&dswid=4349
Google Scholar

Brown, Andrew D. 1997. “Narcissism Identity and Legitimacy.” Academy of Management Review 22(3):643-686.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9708210722

Bryant, Anthony and Kathy Charmaz, eds. 2007. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington: Sage.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941

Bryman, Alan and Emma Bell. 2015. Business Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Clarke, Victoria and Virginia Braun. 2013. “Teaching Thematic Analysis: Overcoming Challenges and Developing Strategies for Effective Learning.” The Psychologist 26(2):120-123.
Google Scholar

Coser, Lewis A. 1974. Greedy Institutions: Patterns of Undivided Commitment. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Esaiasson, Peter et al., eds. 2012. Metodpraktikan: konsten att studera samhälle, individ och marknad [Method Practice: The Art of Studying Society, the Individual, and the Market]. Stockholm: Norstedts juridik.
Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 2013. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 2017. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206

Grant, Patricia and Peter McGhee. 2013. “Organizational Narcissism: A Case of Failed Corporate Governance?” Pp. 97-109 in The Heart of the Good Institution, edited by H. Howard, G. Wijesinghe, and S. McKenzie. Dordrecht: Springer.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5473-7_8

Hochschild, Arlie. 1997. The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165911

Holmberg, Arita and Aida Alvinius. 2019. “How Pressure for Change Challenge Military Organizational Characteristics.” Defence Studies 19(2):130-148.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2019.1575698

Kälvemark, Sofia et al. 2004. “Living with Conflicts-Ethical Dilemmas and Moral Distress in the Healthcare System.” Social Science & Medicine 58(6):1075-1084.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00279-X

Larsson, Gerry, Josi Lundin, and Ann Zander. 2017. Ledarskapsmodellen: konsten att matcha individuella och organisatoriska förutsättningar [The Leadership Model: The Art of Matching Individual and Organizational Conditions]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Google Scholar

Larsson, Gerry et al. 2005. “Indirect Leadership in a Military Context: A Qualitative Study on How to Do It.” The Leadership & Organization Development Journal 26:215-227.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510591761

Mellström, Ulf. 2010. Genusvetenskapliga perspektiv på MSBs verksamhetsområden [Gender Scientific Perspectives on MSB’s Areas of Activity]. Stockholm: Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap.
Google Scholar

Ohlsson, Alicia. 2020. Adaptive Behaviors and Skills in High-Level Military Staff Work: Coping with Organizational Demands, Use of Smooth Power, and Political Skill. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University.
Google Scholar

Olsson, Eva. 2008. Emotioner i arbete: en studie av vårdarbetares upplevelser av arbetsmiljö och arbetsvillkor [Emotions at Work: A Study of Care Workers’ Experiences of the Work Environment and Working Conditions]. Dissertation, Karlstad University.
Google Scholar

Oscarsson, Olof and Erna Danielsson. 2018. “Unrecognized Crisis Management—Normalizing Everyday Work: The Work Practice of Crisis Management in a Refugee Situation.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 26(2):225-236.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12176

Perrow, Charles. 1978. “Demystifying Organizations.” Pp. 105-120 in The Management of Human Services, edited by R. C. Sarri and Y. Hasenfeld. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/sarr93772-007

Radnor, Zoe J. and Ruth Boaden. 2004. “Developing an Understanding of Corporate Anorexia.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 24(4):424-440.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410524677

Rosa, Hartmut. 2013. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/rosa14834

Rosenblatt, Zehava and Zachary Sheaffer. 2001. “Brain Drain in Declining Organizations: Toward a Research Agenda.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 22:409-424.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.89

Segal, Mady W. 1986. “The Military and the Family as Greedy Institutions.” Armed Forces & Society 13(1):9-38.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X8601300101

Sullivan, Teresa A. 2014. “Greedy Institutions, Overwork, and Work‐Life Balance.” Sociological Inquiry 84(1):1-15.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12029

Theorell, Töres, ed. 2012. Psykosocial miljö och stress [Psychosocial Environment and Stress]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Google Scholar

Vaughan, Diane. 1999. “The Dark Side of Organizations: Mistake, Misconduct, and Disaster.” Annual Review of Sociology 25(1):271-305.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.271

Watson, Ian. 2003. Fragmented Futures: New Challenges in Working Life. Annandale: Federation Press.
Google Scholar

Wreder, Malin. 2005. I omsorgens namn: tre diskurser om äldreomsorg [In the Name of Care: Three Discourses on Elderly Care]. Dissertation, Karlstad University.
Google Scholar

Ydén, Karl. 2008. “Kriget” och karriärsystemet: försvarsmaktens organiserande i fred [The “War” and the Career System: The Organization of the Armed Forces in Peace]. Dissertation, University of Gothenburg.
Google Scholar