A Content Management System as an Information Management System in Interdisciplinary Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.350.04Keywords:
team science, content management system, software‑as‑a‑service, case studyAbstract
Teams of scientific specialists have replaced independent researchers, simultaneously the research team size has increased by 50% over the 19‑year period. Better collaborations between project team members might improve research outcomes or R&D project products. Knowledge needs to be communicated among a research team effectively and shared among all research team members as it is created collaboratively. Collaboration can be successfully supported by providing a knowledge sharing environment and communication facilities. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the feasibility and discuss novel communication among scientists using a content management system (CMS) which operates based on the Software‑as‑a‑Service (SaaS) cloud‑computing model. This study presents the use of CMS for the collaboration of a research team carrying out a research project funded by the Polish National Science Centre.
Downloads
References
Adams J. D., Black G. C., Clemmons J. R., Stephan P. E. (2005), Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U. S. universities, 1981–1999, “Research Policy”, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 259–285.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.014
Alsayed M. H., Dahlan H. M., Hussin A. C. (2012), Knowledge sharing in collaborative research activities, “Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation”, vol. 2, pp. 1–8.
Google Scholar
Anatan L. (2015), Conceptual Issues in University to Industry Knowledge Transfer Studies: A Literature Review, “Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences”, vol. 211, pp. 711–717, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815054300 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.090
Baran M., Strojny J. (2013), Kompleksowe podejście do zarządzania projektami na przykładzie uczelni wyższej, “Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie”, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 247–262.
Google Scholar
Bekkers R., Bodas Freitas I. M. (2008), Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?, “Research Policy”, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1837–1853, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733308001558 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
Benlian A., Hess T. (2011), Opportunities and risks of software‑as‑a‑service: Findings from a survey of IT executives, “Decision Support Systems”, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 232–246.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.07.007
Boiko B. (2001), Understanding Content Management, “Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology”, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 8–13.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.221
Chandra P., Dong A. (2018), The relation between knowledge accumulation and technical value in interdisciplinary technologies, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 128, pp. 235–244, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162517301397 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.006
Chard K., Lidman M., McCollam B., Bryan J., Ananthakrishnan R., Tuecke S., Foster I. (2016), Globus Nexus: A Platform‑as‑a‑Service provider of research identity, profile, and group management, “Future Generation Computer Systems”, vol. 56, pp. 571–583, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X1500285X [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.09.006
Charte F., Rivera A. J., Charte D., Jesus M. J. del, Herrera F. (2018), Tips, guidelines and tools for managing multi‑label datasets: The mldr.datasets R package and the Cometa data repository, “Neurocomputing”, vol. 289, pp. 68–85, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231218301401 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.02.011
Chau V. S., Gilman M., Serbanica C. (2017), Aligning university–industry interactions: The role of boundary spanning in intellectual capital transfer, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 123, pp. 199–209, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516000792 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.013
Chou D. C., Chou A. Y. (2007), Analysis of a new information systems outsourcing practice: Software‑as‑a‑service business model, “International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management”, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 392–405.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISCM.2007.017385
Claps G. G., Berntsson Svensson R., Aurum A. (2015), On the journey to continuous deployment: Technical and social challenges along the way, “Information and Software Technology”, vol. 57, pp. 21–31, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584914001694 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.07.009
Cockburn A. (2006), Agile Software Development, The cooperative game, second edition, 2nd ed., Anonymous Pearson Education, Boston.
Google Scholar
Dave B., Koskela L. (2009), Collaborative knowledge management – A construction case study, “Automation in Construction”, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 894–902, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580509000545 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.03.015
Drury‑Grogan M. L., Conboy K., Acton T. (2017), Examining decision characteristics & challenges for agile software development, “Journal of Systems and Software”, vol. 131, pp. 248–265, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121217301103 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.003
Dyer W., Wilkins A. (1991), Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt, “Academy of Management Review”, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 613–619.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279492
Falk‑Krzesinski H. J., Börner K., Contractor N., Fiore S.M., Hall K. L., Keyton J., Spring B., Stokols D., Trochim W., Uzzi B. (2010), Advancing the Science of Team Science, “Clinical and Translational Science”, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 263–266.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00223.x
Fergusson K. (2016), How Universities Use Atlassian Confluence, https://blog.seibert-media.com/2016/08/05/how-universities-use-atlassian-confluence/ [accessed: 27.06.2018].
Google Scholar
Feuerlicht G., Snášel V., Szczepaniak P., Abraham A., Kacprzyk J. (2010), Next generation SOA: Can SOA survive cloud computing?, “Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering”, vol. 2, pp. 19–29.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10687-3_2
Figueiredo M. S.N., Pereira A. M. (2017), Managing Knowledge – The Importance of Databases in the Scientific Production, “Procedia Manufacturing”, vol. 12, pp. 166–173, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978917306108 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.08.021
Fox J., Gutenstein M., Khan O., South M., Thomson R. (2015), OpenClinical.net: A platform for creating and sharing knowledge and promoting best practice in healthcare, “Computers in Industry”, vol. 66, pp. 63–72.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2014.10.001
Goode S., Lin C., Tsai J. C., Jiang J. J. (2015), Rethinking the role of security in client satisfaction with Software‑as‑a‑Service (SaaS) providers, “Decision Support Systems”, vol. 70, pp. 73–85.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.12.005
Gray P. H. (2000), The effects of knowledge management systems on emergent teams: towards a research mode, “The Journal of Strategic Information Systems”, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 175–191.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00040-8
Hall K. L., Feng A. X., Moser R. P., Stokols D., Taylor B. K. (2008), Moving the Science of Team Science Forward: Collaboration and Creativity, “American Journal of Preventive Medicine”, vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S243–S249, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379708004169 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.007
Hawedi M., Talhi C., Boucheneb H. (2018), Security as a Service for Public Cloud Tenants (SaaS), “Procedia Computer Science”, vol. 130, pp. 1025–1030, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050918305052 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.143
Hesse B. W. (2008), Of Mice and Mentors. Developing Cyber‑Infrastructure to Support Transdisciplinary Scientific Collaboration, “American Journal of Preventive Medicine”, vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S235–S239.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.011
Huang M., Chen D. (2017), How can academic innovation performance in university–industry collaboration be improved?, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 123, pp. 210–215, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516300130 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.024
Kim W. (2009), Cloud computing: Today and Tomorrow, “Journal of Object Technology”, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65–72.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5381/jot.2009.8.1.c4
Kim W., Lee J. H., Hong C., Han C., Lee H., Jang B. (2012), An innovative method for data and software integration in SaaS, “Computers and Mathematics with Applications”, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1252–1258.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2012.03.069
Laleci G. B., Aluc G., Dogac A., Sinaci A., Kilic O., Tuncer F. (2010), A semantic backend for content management systems, “Knowledge‑Based Systems”, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 832–843, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705110000894 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.05.008
Lamming M., Eldridge M., Flynn M., Jones C., Pendlebury D. (2000), Satchel: Providing access to any document, anytime, anywhere, “ACM Transactions on Computer‑Human Interaction”, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 322–352.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/355324.355326
Laukkarinen T., Kuusinen K., Mikkonen T. (2018), Regulated software meets DevOps, “Information and Software Technology”, vol. 97, pp. 176–178, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584918300144 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2018.01.011
Lethbridge T. C., Sim S. E., Singer J. (2005), Studying software engineers: Data collection techniques for software field studies, “Empirical Software Engineering”, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 311–341.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-005-1290-x
Mann K. J., Murphy T. E., Wilson N., West M. (2018), Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Agile Planning Tools, https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3872863/magic‑quadrant‑for‑enterprise‑agile‑planning‑tools [accessed: 26.06.2018].
Google Scholar
Matejun M., Szczepańczyk M. (2009), Komunikacja w zespołach projektowych – studium przypadku, [in:] A. Adamik, S. Lachiewicz (eds.), Współpraca w rozwoju współczesnych organizacji, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej, Łódź, pp. 230–242.
Google Scholar
McCutcheon D. M., Meredith J. R. (1993), Conducting case study research in operations management, “Journal of Operations Management”, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 239–256.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(93)90002-7
Melchor‑Ferrer E., Buendía‑Carrillo D. (2016), Web‑based system to improve resource efficiency in university departments, “Journal of Cases on Information Technology”, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–16.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.2016010101
Nakata N., Fukuda Y., Fukuda K., Suzuki N. (2005), DICOM Wiki: Web‑based collaboration and knowledge database system for radiologists, “International Congress Series”, vol. 1281, pp. 980–985.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.03.327
National Research Council (2015), Enhancing the effectiveness of team science, National Academies Press, Washington.
Google Scholar
Nonaka I., Byosiere P., Borucki C. C., Konno N. (1994), Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test, “International Business Review”, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 337–351, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0969593194900272 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-5931(94)90027-2
Park S. H., Ungson G. R. (2001), Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure, “Organization Science”, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–53.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.37.10118
Pérez‑Montoro M. (2011), Theoretical perspectives on content management, [in:] N. Ferrer, J. Alfonso (eds.), Content management for e‑learning, Springer, New York, pp. 3–26.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6959-0_1
Pinho C., Franco M., Mendes L. (2018), Web portals as tools to support information management in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review, “International Journal of Information Management”, vol. 41, pp. 80–92.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.04.002
Portillo‑Rodríguez J., Vizcaíno A., Piattini M., Beecham S. (2014), Using agents to manage Socio‑Technical Congruence in a Global Software Engineering project, “Information Sciences”, vol. 264, pp. 230–259, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514000152 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.009
Rola P. (2018), Identyfikacja czynników sukcesu i porażki projektów badawczych, https://docs.cyfronet.pl/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=19367661 [accessed: 10.10.2018].
Google Scholar
Rola P.M., Kuchta D., Kopczyk D. (2016), Conceptual model of working space for Agile (Scrum) project team, “Journal of Systems and Software”, vol. 118, pp. 49–63.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.071
Runeson P., Host M. (2008), Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering, “Empirical Software Engineering”, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131–164.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8
Ryńca R., Kuchta D. (2011), Transfer wiedzy i technologii w polskim szkolnictwie wyższym, “Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej we Wrocławiu”, no. 22, pp. 87–100.
Google Scholar
Scandura A. (2016), University–industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort, “Research Policy”, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1907–1922, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733316301068 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.009
Sittig D. F., Wright A., Simonaitis L., Carpenter J. D., Allen G. O., Doebbeling B. N., Sirajuddin A. M., Ash J. S., Middleton B. (2010), The state of the art in clinical knowledge management: An inventory of tools and techniques, “International Journal of Medical Informatics”, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 44–57.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.09.003
Stanford University (2017), Confluence, https://uit.stanford.edu/service/confluence [accessed: 26.06.2018].
Google Scholar
Stokols D., Hall K. L., Taylor B. K., Moser R. P. (2008), The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement, “American Journal of Preventive Medicine”, vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S77–S89, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074937970800408X [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002
Svärd P. (2017), 3 – Enterprise content management (ECM), [in:] P. Svärd (ed.), Enterprise Content Management, Records Management and Information Culture Amidst e‑Government Development, Chandos Publishing, Hull, pp. 25–33.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100874-4.00003-X
Uniwersytet Jagielloński (2018), Confluence, https://jakosc.uj.edu.pl/pl_PL/-s-strefy/dla-pelnomocnika/ogloszenia?p_p_id=56_INSTANCE_70pHsaH66GE2&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=column–2&p_p_col_pos=2&p_p_colcount=3&groupId=1609422&articleId=30661315 [accessed: 26.06.2018].
Google Scholar
Uniwersytet Warszawski (2018), Uniwersytet Warszawski: System Dashboard, https://it.jira.uw.edu.pl/ [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
Van Dijck J., Nieborg D. (2009), Wikinomics and its discontents: a critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos, “New Media & Society”, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 855–874.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809105356
Wilkin J. (2013), Finansowanie nauki i szkolnictwa wyższego w Polsce. Wybrane problemy i postulowane kierunki reform, “Studia Biura Analiz Sejmowych”, vol. 3, no. 35, pp. 51–70.
Google Scholar
Wuchty S., Jones B. F., Uzzi B. (2007), The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge, “Science”, vol. 316, no. 5827, pp. 1036–1039.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
Yli‑Huumo J., Maglyas A., Smolander K. (2016), How do software development teams manage technical debt? – An empirical study, “Journal of Systems and Software”, vol. 120, pp. 195–218, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016412121630053X [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.018
Zavale N. C., Macamo E. (2016), How and what knowledge do universities and academics transfer to industry in African low‑income countries? Evidence from the stage of university‑industry linkages in Mozambique, “International Journal of Educational Development”, vol. 49, pp. 247–261, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059316300384 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.04.001