Szacowanie wartości trudnego dziedzictwa kulturowego. Wycena dóbr nierynkowych metodą deklarowanych preferencji na przykładzie modernistycznego kompleksu biurowo‑handlowego

Zbigniew Przygodzki; Ignacy Waleski

doi:10.18778/0208-6018.352.01

Authors

Zbigniew Przygodzki Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Ekonomiczno‑Socjologiczny, Katedra Gospodarki Samorządu Terytorialnego https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6964-8479
Ignacy Waleski Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Ekonomiczno‑Socjologiczny, Katedra Gospodarki Samorządu Terytorialnego https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4946-6923

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.352.01

Keywords:

dissonant heritage, value of cultural heritage, stated preference methods (SPM), intangible assets of cultural heritage

Abstract

The concept of dissonant cultural heritage is well recognized in the literature. It appears in several perspectives, in relation to shameful nation’s history, fratricidal wars, totalitarian past, political regime, or aesthetic. In this article, subject of research is dissonant heritage that was the legacy of Soviet regime times 1945–1989 and at the same time – modernistic architecture, which is ambiguous in aesthetic valuation. Modernistic architecture (from socialistic era in polish history – called socmodernism) is visible in every polish city. It is used for residential, cultural, economic, public and other functions.

Over the decades these buildings have devaluated in physical and moral aspects. More and more often in public discourse appears opinion which claim about necessity of removal these part of unwanted history from polish cities landscape. The question arises whether the removal through destruction or general renovation of cultural heritage is the best way to urban renewal?

This particular work includes induction approach, basing on intentionally selected object, that indicate clear stigmatizing as well as historic features. The main aim of the work is to estimate the value of chosen socmodernistic object, which for many years was the most recognizable and dominant object in central area. The research challenge in this area was an appropriate selection and adaptation of valuation method and also results interpretation. Research were achieved basing on Stated Preference Methods (SPM). The subject of research is recognizable, distinctive for the city of Lodz and its residents, arbitrary chosen office and commercial complex – “Central”. The study was conducted among users of the facility. Research results prove that if a building is characterized by a high level of usability, its value remains high despite the stigmas of dissonant cultural heritage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Báez Montenegro A., Niklitschek Huaquin M., Herrero L. C. (2009), The valuation of historical sites: a case study of Valdivia, Chile, „Journal of Environmental Planning and Management”, vol. 52, no. 1, s. 97–109.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560802504696

Banaszkiewcz M. (2015), Trudne dziedzictwo a turystyka. O dysonansie dziedzictwa kulturowego, „Turystyka Kulturowa”, nr 11, s. 6–20.
Google Scholar

Banaszkiewicz M., Semik Z. (2019), The ‘dissonant’ heritage of Nowa Huta’s shelters: Between education and entertainment, „Tourism”, vol. 29, no. 1, s. 7–13.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/tour-2019-0001

Battilani P., Bernini C., Mariotti A. (2018), How to cope with dissonant heritage: a way towards sustainable tourism development, „Journal of Sustainable Tourism”, vol. 26, no. 8, s. 1417–1433.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1458856

Bedate A., Herrero L. C., Sanz J. A. (2004), Economic valuation of the cultural heritage: application to four case studies in Spain, „Journal of Cultural Heritage”, no. 5, s. 101–111.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2003.04.002

Borin E., Juno‑Delgado E. (2018), The value of cultural and regional identity: an exploratory study of the viewpoints of funders and cultural and creative entrepreneurs, „Encatc Journal of Cultural Management & Policy”, vol. 8, issue 1, s. 17–26.
Google Scholar

Borowski Z. (2016), Neoburżuazyjny anarchokonserwatzym, „Rzut +10”, nr 1, s. 54–64.
Google Scholar

Bosek A., Mazurkiewicz L. (2015), O pewnej metodzie pomiaru nierynkowej wartości obiektu dziedzictwa kulturowego, „Ekonomia i Środowisko”, nr 1(52), s. 149–158.
Google Scholar

Botton A. de (2006), Architektura szczęścia, Czuły Barbarzyńca Press, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Ciarkowski B. (2017), Architektura wypoczynkowa w służbie polityki – kłopotliwe dziedzictwo ośrodków wypoczynkowych z czasów Polski Ludowej, „Wiadomości Konserwatorskie”, nr 49, s. 19–25.
Google Scholar

Costa A. S., Lami I. M., Greco S., Figueira J. R., Borbinha J. (2019), A multiple criteria approach defining cultural adaptive reuse of abandoned buildings, [w:] A. G. Switzerland, S. Huber, M. J. Geiger, A. T. de Almeida (red.), Multiple criteria decision making and aiding: Cases on Models and Methods with Computer Implementations, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 274, Springer International Publishing, Cham, s. 193–220, https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–99304–1_6
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99304-1_6

Dann G. M.S., Seaton A. V. (2001), Slavery, contested heritage and thanatourism, Hawthorn Hospitality Press, New York.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J149v02n03_01

Dragićević Šešić M., Rogač Mijatović L. (2014), Balkan Dissonant Heritage Narratives (and Their Attractiveness) for Tourism, „American Journal of Tourism Management”, vol. 3(1B), s. 10–19.
Google Scholar

Fredheim L. H., Khalaf M. (2016), The significance of values: Heritage value typologies re‑examined, „International Journal of Heritage Studies”, vol. 22(6), s. 466–481.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1171247

Ingerpuu L. (2018), Socialist architecture as today’s dissonant heritage: administrative buildings of collective farms in Estonia, „International Journal of Heritage Studies”, vol. 24, no. 9, s. 954–968.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1428664

Jász B. (2018), Hidden Modernism: Architecture Theory of the Socialist Realist Gap, „Periodica Polytechnica Architecture”, vol. 49(1), s. 92–97.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3311/PPar.12168

Kobyliński Z. (2011), Czym jest, komu jest potrzebne i do kogo należy dziedzictwo kulturowe?, „Mazowsze Studia Regionalne” nr 7, Mazowieckie Biuro Planowania Regionalnego w Warszawie, Warszawa, s. 21–41.
Google Scholar

Light D. (2000), An Unwanted Past: contemporary tourism and the heritage of communism in Romania, „International Journal of Heritage Studies”, vol. 6(2), s. 145–160.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135272500404197

Matysiak K., Stępniak Ł. (2015), Chaos kontrolowany – Rozmowa z E. Rudnicką, „Rzut +9”, nr 4, s. 28–38.
Google Scholar

Morse‑Jones S., Mouratoc S., Ozdemiroglua E., Pearceb D., Provinsa A. (2008), Valuation of the historic environment: The scope for using economic valuation evidence in the appraisal of heritage related projects, „Progress in Planning”, no. 69, s. 131–175.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2008.01.001

Murzyn‑Kupisz M. (2015), Values of cultural heritage in the context of socio‑economics, [w:] B. Szmygin (red.), Heritage value assessment systems. The problems and the current state of research, Lublin University of Technology – Polish National Committee of the International Council on Monuments and Sites ICOMOS, Lublin – Warsaw, s. 147–160.
Google Scholar

Nowakowska A., Guz J., Łaszkiewicz E. (2020), How is the multidimensional perception of modern architectural objects associated with their surroundings? An example of Warsaw Ochota urban railway station, [w:] Z. Gál, S. Z. Kovács, B. Páger (red.), Flows of Resources in the Regional Economy in the Age of Digitalisation. Proceedings of the 7th CERS Conference, Pécs, s. 323–336.
Google Scholar

Ochkovskaya M., Gerasimenko V. (2018), Buildings from the socialist past as a part of a city’s brand identity: The case of Warsaw, „Bulletin of Geography. Socio‑economic Series”, vol. 39(39), s. 113–127.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2018-0008

Pietrzyk‑Kaszyńska A., Czepkiewicz M., Kronenberg J. (2017), Eliciting non‑monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS, „Landscape and Urban Planning”, no. 160, s. 85–95.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.012

Polak E. (2018), Zacieranie granic i rozmywanie znaczeń jako jedna z tendencji współczesnych przemian cywilizacyjnych, „Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie‑Skłodowska – Sectio K”, vol. XXV, no. 1, s. 25–38, http://doi.org/10.17951/k.2018.25.1.25
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/k.2018.25.1.25

Purchla J. (2017), Kwestia dojrzałości, „Herito”, nr 29, s. 12–26.
Google Scholar

Radzimirska W. A. (2011), Problemy ochrony i konserwacji architektury czasów najnowszych na przykładzie warszawskich osiedli mieszkaniowych z lat 1950–1956, „Mazowsze Studia Regionalne”, nr 7, Mazowieckie Biuro Planowania Regionalnego w Warszawie, Warszawa, s. 189–200.
Google Scholar

Sokołowicz M., Przygodzki Z. (2020), The value of ambiguous architecture in cities. The concept of a valuation method of 20th century post‑socialist train stations, „Cities”, vol. 104, 102786, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102786
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102786

Springer F. (2011), Źle urodzone. Reportaże o architekturze PRL‑u, Wydawnictwo Karakter, Kraków.
Google Scholar

Starzec P. (2015), Pamięć w Betonie, „Rzut +9”, nr 4, s. 62–68.
Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 1 kwietnia 2016 r. o zakazie propagowania komunizmu lub innego ustroju totalitarnego przez nazwy jednostek organizacyjnych, jednostek pomocniczych gminy, budowli, obiektów i urządzeń użyteczności publicznej oraz pomniki (Dz.U. z 2016 r., poz. 744).
Google Scholar

Wejchert K. (1984), Elementy kompozycji urbanistycznej, Wydawnictwo Arkady, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Żylicz A. (2008), Wycena dóbr nierynkowych, zapis odczytu wygłoszonego na XLI Szkole Matematyki Poglądowej, Konkret i abstrakcja, s. 8–12, http://www.msn.uph.edu.pl/smp/msn/42/08-12.pdf [dostęp: 7.12.2020].
Google Scholar