On the Use of Selected Ordination Techniques to Analyze the Parliamentary Election Results
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.322.11Keywords:
ordination techniques, redundancy analysis, parliamentary electionsAbstract
Ordination techniques such as CCA (Canonical Correspondence Analysis) or RDA (Redundancy Analysis) are very popular in ecological research but almost completely unknown in, for example, socio-economic research. The goal of this paper is to concisely organize the concepts and terminology associated with ordination and to present the possibilities of its application in social research with an example of the analysis of the 2015 parliamentary elections results.
Downloads
References
Calow P. (red.) (1999), Blackwell’s Concise Encyclopedia of Ecology, Blackwell Science, London.
Google Scholar
Everitt B.S., Skrondal A. (2010), The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, Fourth Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Gauch H.G., Jr. (1982), Noise reduction by eigenvalue ordinations, “Ecology”, vol. 63, pp. 1643–1649.
Google Scholar
Goodall D.W. (1954), Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. III. An essay in the use of factor analysis, “Australian Journal of Botany”, vol. 2, pp. 304–324.
Google Scholar
Gower J.C. (1984), Ordination, multidimensional scaling and allied topics, (in:) W. Lederman [ed.] “Handbook of Applicable Mathematics”, vol. VI: E. Lloyd (ed.) “Statistics”, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 727–781.
Google Scholar
Greenacre M. (2007), Correspondence Analysis in Practice, 2ed., Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton.
Google Scholar
Hill M.O., Gauch H.G. (1980), Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique, “Vegetatio”, vol. 42, pp. 47–58.
Google Scholar
Hotelling H. (1933), Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components, “Journal of Educational Psychology”, vol. 24, pp. 417–441, 498–520.
Google Scholar
Jongman R.H.G., ter Braak C.J.F., van Tongeren O.F.R. (ed.) (1995), Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Legendre P., Legendre L. (1998), Numerical Ecology, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
Google Scholar
Lepš J., Šmilauer P. (2003), Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza: Wyniki wyborów do Sejmu RP z dnia 25 października 2015, Internet site:http://parlament2015.pkw.gov.pl, access: 15.11.2015.
Google Scholar
Pearson K. (1901), On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space, “Philosophical Magazine”, Ser. 6, vol. 2, pp. 559–572.
Google Scholar
Rao C.R. (1964), The Use and Interpretation of Principal Component Analysis in Applied Research, “Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics”, Series A (1961–2002), vol. 26, no. 4 (Dec., 1964), pp. 329–358.
Google Scholar
Regiony Polski (2015), GUS, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
ter Braak C.J.F. (1986), Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis, “Ecology”, vol. 67(5), pp. 1167–1179.
Google Scholar
ter Braak C.J.F. (1994), Canonical community ordination. Part I: Basic theory and linear methods, “Ecoscience”, vol. 2, pp. 127–140.
Google Scholar
ter Braak C.J.F., Prentice I.C. (1988), A theory of gradient analysis, “Advances in Ecological Research”, vol. 18, pp. 271–317.
Google Scholar
van den Wollenberg A.L. (1977), Redundancy analysis. An alternative for canonical correlation analysis, “Psychometrika”, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 207–219.
Google Scholar