Haters on the Internet – background, evolution and legal responsibility

Authors

  • Marta Regina Jabłońska University of Łódź, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Computer Science In Economics, Institute of Applied Economics and Informatics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.326.05

Keywords:

Internet, electronic aggression, cyberbullying, haters

Abstract

The main aim is a review of publications in the area of electronic aggression, especially concerning aggressors legal responsibility. To reach this goal an analysis of various papers (in Polish and English) was taken. The papers were selected due to authors’ output and contribution in area of electronic aggression. In the next step, Polish legal acts were investigated. In effect, it was stated that level of electronic aggression is growing instantly and requires further research. Also Polish law – despite some solutions already taken – demands additional improvements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balci K., Salah A.A. (2014), Automatic analysis and identification of verbal aggression and abusive behaviors for online social games, „Computers in Human Behavior”, no. 53, p. 517–526.
Google Scholar

Barlińska J. (2009), Cyberprzestrzeń – nowa arena przemocy rówieśniczej?, „Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny”, nr 4, s. 51–66.
Google Scholar

Barlińska J., Szuster A., Wiśniewski M. (2013), Cyberbullying among Adolescent Bystanders: Role of the Communication Medium, Form of Violence, and Empathy, „Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology”, (23)1, p. 37–51.
Google Scholar

Barlińska J., Szuster A., Wiśniewski M. (2015), The Role of Short- and Long-Term Cognitive Empathy Activation in Preventing Cyberbystander Reinforcing Cyberbullying Behavior, „Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking”, 18(4), p. 241–244.
Google Scholar

Chiang Y.-T., Lin S., Zhi-Feng Liu E. (2012), The effects of online discussion forum aggressive messages and cognitive distortion on users' negative affect and aggression, „Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology”, 11(2), p. 238–245.
Google Scholar

Christopherson K.M. (2007), The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog., „Computers in Human Behavior”, no. 23, p. 3038–3056.
Google Scholar

Cicchirillo V., Hmielowski J., Hutchens M. (2015), The Mainstreaming of Verbally Aggressive Online Political Behaviors, „Cyberpsychology, Behavior, And Social Networking”, no. 18(5), p. 253–259.
Google Scholar

Coelho P. (1995), Alchemik, Wydawnictwo Drzewo Babel.
Google Scholar

Collins E., Freeman J., Chamarro-Premuzic T. (2012), Personality traits associated with problematic and non-problematic massively multiplayer online role playing game use, „Personality and Individual Differences”, no.52, p. 133–138.
Google Scholar

Dahlberg L. (2001), Computer-Mediated Communication and The Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis, „Journal Of Computer-Mediated Communication”, no. 4(1), p. 615–633.
Google Scholar

France K., Danesh A., Jirard S. (2013), Informing aggression–prevention efforts by comparing perpetrators of brief vs. extended cyber aggression. „Computers in Human Behavior”, no. 29, s. 2143–2149.
Google Scholar

Glaziński S. (2007), Agresja w grach komputerowych, „Edukacja i Dialog”, nr 2, s. 63–67.
Google Scholar

Grabowska A. (2010), Czy internet jest bezpieczny dla dziecka?, „Problemy Opiekuńczo-Wychowawcze”, no.1, p. 38–43.
Google Scholar

Goetz M. (2012), Portale społecznościowe – dobrodziejstwo czy zagrożenie?, „Niebieska Linia”, nr 2, s. 25–27.
Google Scholar

Hayne S.C., Rice R.E. (1997), Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems. „International Journal of Human-Computer Studies”, no. 47, p. 429–452.
Google Scholar

Herring S. (1994), Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame, [w:] M. Bucholtz, A. Liang, L. Sutton, C. Hines (red.), Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Berkeley Women and Language Group, Berkeley, p. 278–294.
Google Scholar

Horner S., Asher Y., Fireman G. (2015), The impact and response to electronic bullying and traditional bullying among adolescents, „Computers in Human Behavior”, no.49, p. 288–295.
Google Scholar

IGOM (2015) http://www.ornontowice.edu.pl/www/sites/default/files/Poradnik%20dla%20rodzic%C3%B3w%20uczni%C3%B3w%20szk%C3%B3%C5%82%20ponadpodstawowych%20ISBN%20978-83-63267-14-8.pdf, [Dostęp 19.10.2015].
Google Scholar

Infante D.A., Wigley C.J. (1986), Verbal aggressiveness: an interpersonal model and measure. „Communication Monographs”; no. 53, p. 61–69.
Google Scholar

Infor (2015) http://www.infor.pl/prawo/prawo-karne/ciekawostki/298808,2,Cyberprzemoc-aodpowiedzialnosc-prawna.html, [Dostęp 19.10.2015].
Google Scholar

Jabłońska M. R. (2015), Narzędzia Web 2.0 w komunikacji B2C na rynku energii, „Rynek Energii”, nr 1(116), s. 90–97.
Google Scholar

Jakubczyk A., Wojnar M. (2009), Impulsywność – definicje, teorie, modele, „Postępy Psychiatrii i Neurologii”; nr 18(4), s. 349–356.
Google Scholar

Katz J. (1997), Birth of a digital nation. „Wired”, no. 5(4), p. 49–52.
Google Scholar

Kellner D. (1998), Intellectuals, the new public spheres, and techno-politics, [in:] C. Toulouse, T.W. Luke (red.), The politics of cyberspace: A new political sciencereader, Wydawnictwo Routledge, New York.
Google Scholar

Kodeks cywilny art. 23 i 24.
Google Scholar

Kodeks karny art. 190a (poprawka do ustawy, opublikowana w Dz.U. z 2011 r. Nr 72, poz. 381).
Google Scholar

Kozak S. (2011), Patologie komunikowania w Internecie: zagrożenia i skutki dla dzieci i młodzieży, Difin, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Krajewska M. (2010), Cyberprzemoc w kontaktach rówieśniczych, „Opieka – Wychowanie – Terapia”, nr 1/2, s. 12–19.
Google Scholar

Laineste L. (2013), Funny or Aggressive? Failed Humour in Internet Comments, „Folklore” (Estonia), no. 53, p. 29–46.
Google Scholar

Law D.M., Shapka J.D., Hymel S., Olson B.F., Waterhouse T. (2012), The changing face of bullying: An empirical comparison between traditional and internet bullying and victimization, „Computers in Human Behavior”, no. 28, p. 226–232.
Google Scholar

Li Q. (2007), New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. „Computers in Human Behavior”, no. 23, p. 1777–1791.
Google Scholar

Lin S.S.J., Liu E.Z.F., Yuan S.-M. (2001), Web-based peer assessment: Does attitude influence achievement?, „IEEE Transactions on Education”, 44(2), p. 211.
Google Scholar

Liu E.Z.F., Ko H.W. (2007), Implementation and evaluation of an e-tutor program, „WSEAS Transactions on Communications”, no. 6(4), p. 547–552.
Google Scholar

Marczak G. (2013), http://antyweb.pl/bedziemy-musli-udostepnic-dane-hejtera-o-co-tu-chodzi/, [Dostęp 19.10.2015].
Google Scholar

Markey P.M., Markey C.N. (2010), Vulnerability to violent video games: A review and integration of personality research, „Review of General Psychology”, no.14, p. 82.
Google Scholar

NY Times (2008) http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/27/us/27myspace.html?_r=0, [Dostęp 19.10.2015].
Google Scholar

Osica N. (2008), O stalkingu inaczej, „Niebieska Linia”, nr 3, s. 9–12.
Google Scholar

Podolak B. (2015), http://rozmaitosci.com/jak-pozwac-hejtera-do-sadu/, [Dostęp 19.10.2015].
Google Scholar

Pyżalski J. (2008), Agresja elektroniczna – wirtualne ciosy, realne rany, „Remedium”, nr 9, s. 26–27.
Google Scholar

Pyżalski J. (2008), Agresja elektroniczna – wirtualne ciosy, realne rany, „Remedium”, nr 10, s. 28–29.
Google Scholar

Pyżalski J. (2009), Agresja elektroniczna dzieci i młodzieży – różne wymiary zjawiska, „Dziecko krzywdzone”, nr 1(26), s. 12–26.
Google Scholar

Pyżalski J. (2009), Agresja elektroniczna i mobbing elektroniczny gimnazjalistów w kontekście zaangażowania w stosowaniu nowych technologii komunikacyjnych, „Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny”, nr 4, s. 31–51.
Google Scholar

Pyżalski J. (2009), Agresja elektroniczna – wirtualne ciosy, realne rany, „Remedium”, nr 10, s. 10–11.
Google Scholar

Pyżalski J. (2010), Agresja elektroniczna – wirtualne ciosy, realne rany, „Remedium”, nr 7–8, s. 6–7.
Google Scholar

Pyżalski J. (2011), Electronic aggression among adolescents: An old house with a new facade (or even a number of houses), [w:] C. Hällgren, E. Dunkels, G.-M. Frånberg (red.), Youth culture and net culture: Online social practices, Wydawnictwo IGI Global.
Google Scholar

Pyżalski J. (2012), From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: typology of the phenomenon, „Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties”, 17(3–4), s. 305–317
Google Scholar

Pyżalski J. (2013), Beyond Peer Cyberbullying – Involvement of Polish Adolescents in Different Kinds of Electronic Aggression, „Studia edukacyjne”, nr 28, s. 147–167.
Google Scholar

Pyżalski J., Schultze-Krumbholz A., Göbel K., Scheithauer H., Brighi A., Guarini A., Haralambos T., Barkoukis V., Plichta P., Del Rey R., Casas J.A., Thompson F., Smith P.K. (2014), A Comparison of Classification Approaches for Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying Using Data From Six European Countries, „Journal of School Violence”, no. 14, p. 47–65.
Google Scholar

Shepherd T., Harvey A., Jordan T., Srauy S., Miltner K. (2015), Histories of Hating, „Social Media + Society”, no. 7–12, p. 1–10.
Google Scholar

Skarżyńska-Sernaglia J., Latanzi M. (2009), Od wielbiciela do zabójcy, „Niebieska Linia”, nr 5, s. 23–25.
Google Scholar

Szpunar M. (2009), Flaming i trolling jako formy agresji werbalnej w Internecie, „Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny”, nr 4, s. 67–80.
Google Scholar

Tereszkiewicz A. (2012), Do Poles flame? Aggressiveness on Polish discussion groups and social networking sites, [w:] L. Laineste, D. Brzozowska, W. Chlopicki (red.) Estonia and Poland. Creativity and tradition in cultural Communications, „Jokes and their relations” no. 1, Tartu: ELM Scholarly Press 2012, p. 237–268.
Google Scholar

Thompen P.A., Foulger D.A. (1996), Effects of pictographs and quoting on flaming in electronic mail, „Computers in Human Behavior”, no. 12(2), s. 225–243.
Google Scholar

Vivolo-Kantor A.M., Martell B., Holland K., Westby R. (2014), A Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Bullying and Cyber-bullying Measurement Strategies, „Aggression and Violent Behavior”, no. 19(4), p. 423–434.
Google Scholar

Wesołowska A.M. (2012), Cyberprzemoc i przemoc rówieśnicza, „Dyrektor Szkoły”, nr 2, s. 46–49.
Google Scholar

Wojtasik Ł. (2007), Dzieci w sieci, „Remedium”, nr 8, s. 10–11.
Google Scholar

Wojtasik Ł. (red.) (2009), Jak reagować na cyberprzemoc?, Wydawca Fundacja Dzieci Niczyje, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Ybarra M.L., Mitchell K.J. (2004), Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics, „Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry”, no. 45, p. 1308–1316.
Google Scholar

Yudofsky S., Silver J., Jackson W., Endicott J., Williams D. (1986), The ofert aggression scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression, „American Journal of Psychiatry”, no. 143, p. 35–39.
Google Scholar

Zimbardo P.G. (1969), The human choice: Individuation, reason and order, versus deindividuation, impulse and chaos, [in:] W. Arnold, D. Levine (red.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
Google Scholar

Zimmerman A.G., Ybarra G.J. (2014), Online Aggression: The Influences of Anonymity and Social Modeling, „Psychology of Popular Media Culture”, no. 06, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000038, [Dostęp 16.10.2015].
Google Scholar

Published

2017-05-22

How to Cite

Jabłońska, M. R. (2017). Haters on the Internet – background, evolution and legal responsibility. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 6(326), [67]–79. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.326.05

Issue

Section

Articles