This is an outdated version published on 2023-12-30. Read the most recent version.

Adding value by national reporting to sustainability approaches of the local-regional level: The case of Germany

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.30.2.04

Keywords:

Urban Studies, Urban Development, Sustainable Development, Sustainable Development Goals, New Urban Agenda, Germany

Abstract

Global socio-environmental challenges and local impacts, global agendas, and local implementation: multi-level governance has never been more important – or more complex. To keep track of progress and the challenges in sustainable urban development, monitoring systems at all levels are at different stages of development and in need of harmonisation. In this context, national reporting can link the global level with the local one by identifying and reviewing framework conditions, and setting indicator and data standards for cities, counties, and municipalities. This raises questions about the awareness of different issues, resource imbalances and, not least, the effectiveness of standardised monitoring. This paper provides valuable insights into the lessons learned from the preparation of the first national progress report on the implementation of the New Urban Agenda. The reflections could support further governance and monitoring efforts not only at the national level but also across all levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BBR – BUNDESAMT FÜR BAUWESEN UND RAUMORDNUNG (2000), Stadtentwicklung und Städtebau in Deutschland – Ein Überblick. Berichte, Band 5, Bonn.

BBSR – FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON BUILDING, URBAN AFFAIRS AND SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT (ed.) (2021), National Progress Report on the implementation of the New Urban Agenda, BBSR-Online-Publikation 03/2021, https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/EN/publications/OnlinePublications/2021/bbsr-online-03-2021-dl.pdf?__blob=publication-File&v=4 [accessed on: 17.03.2023].

BHATTACHARYA, D. and ALI, M. A. (2014), The SDGs–What are the “Means of Implementation”?, Future United Nations Development System.

BPB – FEDERAL AGENCY FOR CIVIC EDUCATION (2002), Lokale Agenda 21 in Deutschland – eine Bilanz, Politik und Zeitgeschichte (B 31–32/2002).

BERTELSMANN STIFTUNG (ed.) (2016), Monitor Nachhaltige Kommune – Bericht 2016 – Teil 1. Ergebnisse der Befragung und der Indikatorenentwicklung, Gütersloh, https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/Projekte/Monitor_Nachhaltige_Kommune/Monitorbericht_Teil-1_Druck_final.pdf [accessed on: 17.03.2023].

FEDERAL STATISTICAL OFFICE OF GERMANY (2023), Sustainable development strategies and indicators of the Länder, https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-Environment/Sustainable-Development-Indicators/German/SubstainableDevelopmentIndicatorsLaender.html?nn=24072 [accessed on: 21.07.2023].

GILES-CORTI, B., LOWE, M. and ARUNDEL, J. (2020), ‘Achieving the SDGs: Evaluating indicators to be used to benchmark and monitor progress towards creating healthy and sustainable cities’, Health Policy, 124 (6), pp. 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.001

HÁK, T., JANOUŠKOVÁ, S. and MOLDAN, B. (2016), ‘Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators’, Ecological Indicators, 60, pp. 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003

HERTLE, H., DÜNNEBEIL, F., GURGEL, B., RECHSTEINER, E. and REINHARD, C. (2019), BISKO Bilanzierungs-Systematik Kommunal – Empfehlungen zur Methodik der kommunalen Treibhausgasbilanzierung für den Energie- und Verkehrssektor in Deutschland, Heidelberg, https://www.ifeu.de/publikation/bisko-bilanzierungs-systematik-kommunal/ [accessed on: 17.02.2023].

HUBRICH, S., LIEßKE, F., WITTWER, R., WITTIG, S. and GERIKE, R. (2019), Methodenbericht zum Forschungsprojekt „Mobilität in Städten – SrV 2018“, Technische Universität Dresden, https://tu-dresden.de/srv [accessed on: 17.03.2023].

JOSSIN, J., PETERS, O., HOLZ, P. and GRABOW, B. (2020), Methodik zur Entwicklung von SDG-Indikatoren für Kommunen, [in:] Bertelsmann Stiftung, Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, Deutscher Landkreistag, Deutscher Städtetag, Deutscher Städte- und Gemeindebund, Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik, Engagement Global (Servicestelle Kommunen in der Einen Welt), Rat der Gemeinden und Regionen Europas / Deutsche Sektion (Hrsg.), SDG-Indikatoren für Kommunen – Indikatoren zur Abbildung der Sustainable Development Goals der Vereinten Nationen in deutschen Kommunen. 2nd edition. Gütersloh, pp. 34–157, https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/de/publikationen/publikation/did/sdg-indikatoren-fuer-kommunen-all [accessed on: 17.03.2023].

KNIPPERTS, J. (2020), SDG-Indikatoren für kommunale Entwicklungspolitik – Indikatoren für den entwicklungspolitischen Beitrag von Kommunen zu den Sustainable Development Goals, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann

Stiftung.

KOCH, F., KRELLENBERG, K.. REUTER, K.. LIBBE, J.. SCHLEICHER, K., KRUMME, K., SCHUBERT, S. and KERN, K. (2019), ‘Wie lassen sich die Sustainable Development Goals umsetzen?’ disP – The Planning Review, 55 (4), pp. 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2019.1708063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2019.1708063

PERRY, B., DIPROSE, K., TAYLOR BUCK, N. and SIMON, D. (2021), ‘Localizing the SDGs in England: challenges and value propositions for local government’, Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.746337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.746337

OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2020), A Territorial Approach to the Sustainable Development Goals: Synthesis report, OECD Urban Policy Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/e86fa715-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/e86fa715-en

RUDD, A., SIMON, D., CARDDAMA, M., BIRCH, E. L. and REVI, A. (2018), ‘The UN, the urban sustainable development goal, and the New Urban Agenda’, [in:] T. ELMQVIST, X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316647554.011

BAI, N. FRANTZESKAKI, C. GRIFFITH, D. MADDOX, T. MCPHEARSON, et al. (eds), Chapter 9, Urban Planet (University Press Cambridge), pp. 180–196, http://www.cambridge.org/9781107196933 [accessed on: 17.03.2023].

SHI, L., HAN, L., YANG, F. and GAO, L. (2019), ‘The Evolution of Sustainable Development Theory: Types, Goals, and Research Prospects’, Sustainability, 11 (24), 7158. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247158

STEFFEN, W., BROADGATE, W., DEUTSCH, L., GAFFNEY, O. and LUDWIG, C. (2015), ‘The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration’, The Anthropocene Review, 2 (1), pp. 81−98. https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196145647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785

BARNETT, C. and PARNELL, S. (2016), ‘Ideas, implementation and indicators: epistemologies of the post-2015 urban agenda’, Environment and Urbanization, 28 (1), pp. 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815621473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815621473

VALENCIA, S. C., SIMON, D., CROESE, S., NORDQVIST, J., OLOKO, M., SHARMA, T., SHARMA, T. and VERSACE, I. (2019), ‘Adapting the Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda to the city level: Initial reflections from a comparative research project’, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 11 (1), pp. 4–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Peters, Oliver, and Henrik Scheller. 2023. “Adding Value by National Reporting to Sustainability Approaches of the Local-Regional Level: The Case of Germany”. European Spatial Research and Policy 30 (2): 45-59. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.30.2.04.