This is an outdated version published on 2022-11-17. Read the most recent version.

The spatial, temporal and structural approach to interregional tourism inflows’ sustainability – on the example of four Erasmus+ SPOT project case study regions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.29.2.10

Keywords:

tourist flows, spatial concentration of tourists, weighted intensity of tourism, Piemonte, Innlandet, Łódzkie, Centro

Abstract

Based on produced regional data on tourism arrivals across 297 NUTS2 regions of the EU and EFTA countries covering the temporal scope of 2010–2018, the spatial concentration of tourist inflow in Europe, average annual dynamics of tourist inflow between 2010–2018, and a relative position of the tourist branch of the economy in a given region has been determined. An attempt was made to present a typology of regions according to the weighted intensity and spatial concentration of tourist inflow. Special attention has been given to SPOT project case study regions: Piemonte in Italy, Innlandet in Norway, Łódzkie in Poland, and Centro in Portugal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CASTELLS, M. (2004), ‘An Introduction to the Information Age’, [in:] WEBSTER, F., BLOM, R., KARVONEN, E., MELIN, H., NORDENSTRENG, K. and PUOSKARI, E. (eds.), The Information Society Reader, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 138–149.
Google Scholar

CHRISTALLER, W. (1963), ‘Some considerations of tourism location in Europe: the peripheral regions under developed countries-recreation areas’, Regional Science Association Papers, 12, pp. 95–105.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01941243

ESPON IRiE (2021), Interregional flows of tourism in Europe, Final Report, Annex 6, https://www.espon.eu/programme/projects/espon-2020/applied-research/interregional-relations-europe [accessed on: 16.05.2022].
Google Scholar

ESPON IRiE (2022), Pan-european systemic analysis, Scientific Report, https://www.espon.eu/programme/projects/espon-2020/applied-research/interregional-relations-europe [accessed on: 16.05.2022].
Google Scholar

EUROSTAT (2021), Database, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database [accessed on: 12.02.2021].
Google Scholar

FENNELL, D. A. and COOPER, C. (2020), Sustainable Tourism: Principles, Contexts and Practices, Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Channel View Publications, https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845417673
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845417673

GARIN-MUNOZ, T. and PEREZ AMARAL, T. (2000), ‘An econometric model for international tourism flows to Spain’, Applied Economics Letters, 7 (8), pp. 525–529.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850050033319

KÁDÁR, B. and GEDE, M. (2021), ‘Tourism flows in large-scale destination systems’, Annals of Tourism Research, 87, 103113, pp. 1-16.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.103113

LOZANO, S. and GUTIÉRREZ, E. (2018), ‘A complex network analysis of global tourism flows’, International Journal of Tourism Research, 20 (5), pp. 588–604.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2208

MAZUR, M. and CZAPIEWSKI K. (2016), ‘Functional structure of gminas in Poland – classification approaches and research opportunities’, [in:] WÓJCIK, M. and CZAPIEWSKI, K. (eds.), Multifunctional development in rural spaces: challenges for policy and planning, Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 43, pp. 7–22.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7163/SOW.43.1

PRIDEAUX, B. (2005), ‘Factors affecting bilateral tourism flows’, Annals of Tourism Research, 32 (3), pp. 780–801.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.04.008

SHAO, Y., HUANG, S., WANG, Y., LI, Z. and LUO, M. (2020), ‘Evolution of international tourist flows from 1995 to 2018: A network analysis perspective’, Tourism Management Perspectives, 36, 100752, pp. 1-14.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100752

SONG, H. and WITT, S. (2006), ‘Forecasting international tourist flows to Macau’, Tourism Management, 27 (2), pp. 214–224.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.09.004

SPOT (2022), SPOT. Sustainable Spatial Planning of Tourism Destinations, https://spot-erasmus.eu/ [accessed on: 17.05.2022].
Google Scholar

UNWTO (2021), UNWTO Tourism Data Dashboard, https://www.unwto.org/unwto-tourism-dashboard [accessed on: 12.02.2021].
Google Scholar

UNWTO (2022), Sustainable Development, https://www.unwto.org/sustainable-development [accessed on: 16.05.2022].
Google Scholar

VIEGAS, J., SILVA, E. A. and MARTINEZ L. (2009), ‘Effects of the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem on the Delineation of Traffic Analysis Zones’, Environment and Planning B – Planning and Design, 36 (4), pp. 625–643.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b34033

WILLIAMS, S. and LEW, A. A. (2015), Tourism Geography. Critical Understandings of Place, Space and Experience, 3rd Edition, London and New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203743881

ZHANG, J. and JENSEN, C. (2007), ‘Comparative advantage: Explaining Tourism Flows’, Annals of Tourism Research, 34 (1), pp. 223–243.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2006.08.004

Downloads

Published

2022-11-17

Versions

How to Cite

Mazur, M., Czapiewski, K., & Cerić, D. (2022). The spatial, temporal and structural approach to interregional tourism inflows’ sustainability – on the example of four Erasmus+ SPOT project case study regions. European Spatial Research and Policy, 29(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.29.2.10

Issue

Section

Articles

Funding data

  • Erasmus+
    Grant numbers 2019-1-PL01-KA203-064946

Most read articles by the same author(s)