Some additional axioms for t-normal logics. Defining K45, KB4, KD45 and S5 without using modal rules

Andrzej Pietruszczak

doi:10.18778/0138-0680.2024.12

Authors

Andrzej Pietruszczak Department of Logic, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9133-5081

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0138-0680.2024.12

Keywords:

modal logic, t-normal logics, Kripke-style semantics

Abstract

The paper will study extensions of t-normal logics S0.5^o and S0.5 using some axioms of normal logics. We will prove determination theorems for these extensions by appropriate Kripke-style models. It will allow us to obtain the determinations of the logics K45, KB4 (= KB5), KD45 and S5 without using modal rules.

References

B. F. Chellas, Modal Logic: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621192.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621192

G. E. Hughes, M. J. Cresswell, A New Introduction to Modal Logic, Routledge, London and New York (1966).
Google Scholar

E. J. Lemmon, New foundations for Lewis modal systems, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 22(2) (1957), pp. 176–186, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/29641792.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2964179

A. Pietruszczak, Simplified Kripke style semantics for modal logics K45, KB4 and KD45, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, vol. 38(3/4) (2009), pp. 163–171.
Google Scholar

A. Pietruszczak, Simplified Kripke style semantics for some very weak modal logics, Logic and Logical Philosophy, vol. 18(3–4) (2009), pp. 271–296, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2009.013.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2009.013

A. Pietruszczak, Semantical investigations on some weak modal logics. Part I, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, vol. 41(1/2) (2012), pp. 33–50.
Google Scholar

A. Pietruszczak, Semantical investigations on some weak modal logics. Part II, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, vol. 41(3/4) (2012), pp. 109–130.
Google Scholar

R. Routley, Decision procedure and semantics for C1, E1 and S0.5^(∘), Logique et Analyse, vol. 11(44) (1968), pp. 468–471.
Google Scholar