A morphological comparison between a death mask of the American Prophet Joseph Smith and a photograph likely to depict him
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.85.4.01Keywords:
Joseph Smith, image analysis, morphology, death mask, anatomyAbstract
Application of forensic identification methods to establish authenticity of a historical photograph is made. Joseph Smith Junior was the Prophet and founder of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, often referred to as Mormons. In 1844 Joseph and his brother Hyrum were shot and killed by a mob of angry men who opposed his church and its followers. Shortly after death, Joseph’s face was moulded, and a death mask was made. Photography was invented during the life of Joseph Smith Jnr and there are reports that he had a daguerreotype (photograph) taken, but no image has been verified to be of him.
A photographic image of an Illinois man from the 1840s is linked by circumstantial evidence, such as similar clothing, to Joseph Smith Jnr and the photographer’s studio being close to where Joseph Smith III was at the time the photograph has been produced. A morphological comparison is made between the death mask and the photograph in order to establish the likelihood that the man in the photograph is the prophet. Sixteen points of anatomical similarity were found between the death mask and the photograph, the most compelling of which is asymmetry of the face and a possible scar in the area of the left eyebrow. Superimposition confirmed morphological similarity. Finding of close morphological similarity is not an ultimate proof of identification, but increases the probability that the photograph depicts Joseph Smith Junior. This is the first case of an anatomical comparison between a death mask and a photograph.
Downloads
References
Bibbins JS. 1860. United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Big Grove, Kendall, Illinois; Page: 73; Family History Library Film: 803194. Retrieved from https://www.ancestry.com/discoveryuicontent/view/37536705:7667?tid=&pid=&queryId=fc42271eb2a9bb13e3813239ce17546b&_phsrc=jSI7&_phstart=success-Source [Accessed 1 July 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Burstow S. 2016. The Carte de Visite and Domestic Digital Photography. Photographies 9(3):287–305, https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2016.1202309
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2016.1202309
Finsterer J. 2003. Ptosis: Causes, Presentation, and Management. Aesth Plast Surg 27:193–204, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-0127-5
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-0127-5
Gabriel P, Huckenbeck W. 2013. Identification of the living. In: Encyclopedia of forensic sciences (2nd edition). Eds. Siegel, JA, Saukko, PJ, Houck, MM. Academic press. 97–105.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382165-2.00017-9
Gayler GR. 1957. Governor Ford and the death of Joseph and Hyrum Smith. JISHS 50(4):391–411.
View in Google Scholar
HoultonTMR, Steyn M. 2018. Finding Makhubu: a morphological forensic facial comparison. Forensic Sci Int 285:13–20.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.01.022
Iscan MY, Steyn M. 2013. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. Charles C Thomas. Springfiled, IL.
View in Google Scholar
Lucas T, Henneberg M. 2015. Are human faces unique? A metric approach to finding single individuals without duplicates in large samples. Forensic Sci Int 257:514-e1–514e6.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.003
Lucas T, Kumaratilake J, Henneberg M. 2016. Metric identification of the same people from images – how reliable is it? J Anthropol 2016:1–10.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1760313
Martin R, Saller K. 1957. Lehrbuch der Antropologie, Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, Germany.
View in Google Scholar
McCarl WB. 1962. The Visual image of Joseph Smith. (Dissertation, Brigham Young University).
View in Google Scholar
Moreton R, Morley J. 2011. Investigation into the use oof photoanthropometry in facial image comparison. Forensic Sci Int 212:231–237.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.06.023
Porter G. 2009. CCTV images as evidence. Aust J Forensic Sci 41(1):11–25.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00450610802537960
Porter G, Doran G. 2000. An anatomical and photographic technique for forensic facial identification. Forensic Sci Int 114(2):97–105.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00290-5
Quinn DM. 1976. The Mormon succession crisis of 1844. BYU studies quarterly 16(2):187–233.
View in Google Scholar
Romig R, Macay L. 2022. Hidden things shall come to light: the visual image of Joseph Smith Jr. John Whitmer Historical Association 42(1), https://www.jwha.info [Accessed 1 July 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Scoleri T, Lucas T, Henneberg M. 2014. Effect of garments on photoanthropometry of body parts: Application of stature estimation. Forensic Sci Int 237:1–12.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.038
Smith J. 1835. Letter to William Smith. The Joseph Smith Papers, Church History Library, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/letter-to-william-smith-circa-18-december-1835/5 [Accessed 18 January 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Smith J. 1842a. 2nd November 1838-31st July 1842. The Joseph Smith Papers, Journal, Church History Library, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/history-1838-1856-volume-c-1-2-november-1838-31-july-1842/522 [Accessed 1 July 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Smith J. 1842b. Journal, December 1841-December 1842. The Joseph Smith Papers , Church History Library, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/journal-december-1841-december-1842/82#XB7538EB9-FC09-4743-8FA3-B2226C784F11 [Accessed 1 July 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Smith J. 1844. Journal, December 1842–1844; March-June 1844. The Joseph Smith Papers, Church History Library, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/journal-december-1842-june-1844-book-4-1-march-22-june-1844/106 [Accessed 3 July 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Smith J. 1979. The memoirs of Joseph Smith III (1832–1914). Herald Publishing House, Independence, Missouri.
View in Google Scholar
Smith J. 2015, The Joseph Smith Papers, Journals, V.3, May 1843-June 1844. Church Historian’s Press, p. 238. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/journal-december-1842-june-1844-book-4-1-march-22-june-1844/103 [Accessed 3 July 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Srinath N, Balaji R, Basha MS. 2012. Ptosis correction: a challenge following complex orbital injuries. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 11(2):195–199, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0300-3
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0300-3
Svadlena J. 2014. Daguerrotype – the first ever practically used photographic technique Daguerrotype – the first ever practically used photographic technique. Koroze a Ochrana Materiálu 58(2):59–64.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/kom-2014-0009
Taylor J. 2017. Witness to the Martyrdom: John Taylor ’s Personal account of the last days of the Prophet Joseph Smith. 2nd Edn. Deseret Book. Salt Lake City, Utah.
View in Google Scholar
The Diary of Joseph Smith (1805–1834) [diary] 1832 March, p. 205–207 in The Joseph Smith Papers, https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/history-1838-1856-volume-a-1-23-december-1805-30-august-1834/213 [Accessed 18 January 2021].
View in Google Scholar
The Saints Herald (1879), Volume 26, pg. 254 Plano, Illinois. August 15th, 1879. https://archive.org/details/TheSaintsHerald_Volume_26_1879/page/n253/mode/2up [Accessed 18 January 2021].
View in Google Scholar
Weber CG. 2009. Skull and crossed bones: A forensic study of the remains of Joseph and Hyrum Smith. Mormon Historical Studies, Salt Lake City, Utah.
View in Google Scholar
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.