Analysis of biological difference between prehistoric populations using a non-hierarchic method of data clustering

Arkadiusz Sołtysiak; Piotr Jaskulski

doi:10.18778/1898-6773.62.09

Authors

Arkadiusz Sołtysiak Warsaw University, Department of Historical Anthropology, Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, Warszawa
Piotr Jaskulski State Archaeological Museum, Department of Computer Science, Długa 52, 00-950 Warszawa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.62.09

Abstract

Presented in this paper non-hierarchic method of cluster analysis allows studying of morphological variability in big populations on the basis of individual characteristic of specimens. Test taken by the authors have confirmed correct results of the proposed algorithm and showed the role of proper preparation of data, choice of appropriate distance measure and importance of the process of interpretation the results of clustering.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Arkadiusz Sołtysiak, Warsaw University, Department of Historical Anthropology, Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, Warszawa

Presented in this paper non-hierarchic method of cluster analysis allows studying of morphological variability in big populations on the basis of individual characteristic of specimens. Test taken by the authors have confirmed correct results of the proposed algorithm and showed the role of proper preparation of data, choice of appropriate distance measure and importance of the process of interpretation the results of clustering.

References

HENKE W., 1991, Biological distances in late Pleistocene and early Holocene human populations in Europe, Variability and Evolution, 1, 39-46
View in Google Scholar

HOWELLS W.W, 1989, Skull shapes and the map: Craniometric analyses in the dispersion of modern Homo, Papers of the Peabody Museum, 79
View in Google Scholar

LARO P.M., 1998, Dobór współczynników podobieństwa w badaniach zbiorowisk roślinnych, [in:] Metody numeryczne w badaniach struktury i funkcjonowania szaty roślinnej, E. Kazimierczak (ed.), Wyd. UMK, Toruń, 119 - 131
View in Google Scholar

LYNCH M., 1989, Phylogenetic hypotheses under the assumption of neutral quantitative-genetic variation, Evolution, 43, 1-17
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04203.x

MAREK T., C. NOWOROL, 1987, Zarys analizy skupień. Niehierarchiczne i hierarchiczne techniki skupiania, [in:] Wielozmiennowe modele statystyczne w badaniach psychologicznych, J. Brzeziński (ed.), PWN, Poznań, 184-204
View in Google Scholar

MAYS S., 1998, The archaeology of Human Bones, Routledge, London
View in Google Scholar

OVERALL J. E., C. J. KLETT, 1972, Applied multivariate analysis, McGraw Hill, New York
View in Google Scholar

PIONTEK J, 1985, Biologia populacji pradziejowych, Wyd. Nauk. UAM, Poznań
View in Google Scholar

ZAKRZEWSKA T., 1987, O miarach podobieństwa obiektów i cech przydatnych w psychologicznych zastosowaniach analizy skupień, [in:] Wielozmiennowe modele statystyczne w badaniach psychologicznych, J. Brzeziński (ed.), PWN, Poznań, 205-259
View in Google Scholar