Secular changes in human reproduction and assisted reproductive technologies

Authors

  • Arthur Saniotis Department of Anthropology, Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland; Biological Anthropology and Comparative Anatomy Research Unit, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Australia
  • Maciej Henneberg Biological Anthropology and Comparative Anatomy Research Unit, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Australia; Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zürich, Switzerland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021-0019

Keywords:

The self-amplifying mechanism of human evolution

Abstract

Since the middle to late 20th century the majority of children born in the developing world have been likely to enter into post-reproductive age. Currently, child mortality is at its lowest level in human history. While more children are living to post reproductive age, approximately 15% of couples are experiencing infecundity. This is either a result of one or both members of the couple being infecund, or, despite both being fecund, the interaction between them prevents fertility for some reason. Assisted reproductive technologies have provided many infertile couples an opportunity to have children. Assisted reproductive technologies operate by intervening and manipulating gametic and intrauterine natural selection. This paper discusses the possible influence of assisted reproductive technologies on child development. This paper outlines some of the reported changes in children resulting from assisted reproductive technologies. Although, few people are either aware or care about possible long term consequences of relaxed natural selection contributed by medical intervention (i.e. assisted reproductive technologies) we have little understanding to what extent such medical interference may affect long term fitness in humans.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Chambers GM, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, et al. 2018. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011. Fertil Steril 110:1067–80.
View in Google Scholar

Agrawal AF, Whitlock MC. 2012. Mutation load: the fitness of individuals in populations where deleterious alleles are abundant. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43:115–35.
View in Google Scholar

Bhatia K, Ghabriel M, Henneberg M. 2005. Anatomical variations in the branches of the human arch of the aorta: a possible increase in recent times? Folia Morphol 64:217–23.
View in Google Scholar

Bielicki T. 1969. Niektóre związki zwrotne w procesie ewolucji Hominidae. Mat i Prace Antrop 77:3–60.
View in Google Scholar

Bloom K, van den Berg F, Arbuthnot P. 2021. Self-amplifying RNA vaccines for infectious diseases. Gene Ther 28:117–29.
View in Google Scholar

Budnik A, Liczbinska G, Gumna I. 2004. Demographic trends and biological status of historic populations from Central Poland: the Ostrów Lednicki microregion. Am J Phys Anthropol 125(4):369–81.
View in Google Scholar

Castillo-Fernandez JE, Loke YJ, Bass-Stringer S, et al. 2017. DNA methylation changes at infertility genes in newborn twins conceived by in vitro fertilisation. Genome Med 9(1):28.
View in Google Scholar

Ceelen M, van Weissenbruch MM, Roos JC, Vermeiden JP, van Leeuwen FE, et al. 2007. Body composition in children and adolescents born after in vitro fertilization or spontaneous conception. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 9:3417–23.
View in Google Scholar

Ceelen M, van Weissenbruch MM, Vermeiden JP, van Leeuwen FE, Delemarre-van de Waal HA. 2008. Cardiometabolic differences in children born after in vitro fertilization: follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 5:1682–8.
View in Google Scholar

Clark G, Henneberg M. 2017. Ardipithecus ramidus and the evolution of language and singing: an early origin for hominin vocal capability. JCHB Homo 68(2):101–21.
View in Google Scholar

Clark G, Henneberg M. 2015. The life history of Ardipithecus ramidus: a heterochronic model of sexual and social maturation. Anthropol Rev 78(2):109–32.
View in Google Scholar

Cong J, Li P, Zheng L, Tan J. 2016. Prevalence and risk factors of infertility at a rural site of Northern China. PLoS One 11:e0155563.
View in Google Scholar

1371/journal.pone.0155563. D’Angelo S, Meccariello R. 2021. Micro-plastics: a threat for male fertility. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:2392. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052392
View in Google Scholar

Eaton SB, Beverly I, Strassman BI, Randolph M, Nesse RM, Neel JV, et al. 2002. Evolutionary health promotion. Preventive Medicine 34:109–18.
View in Google Scholar

Eaton SB, Konner M, Shostak, M. 1988. Stone agers in the fast lane: chronic degenerative diseases in evolutionary perspective. Am J Med 84:739–49.
View in Google Scholar

El Hajj N, Haertle L, Dittrich M, et al. 2017. DNA methylation signatures in cord blood of ICSI children. Hum Reprod 32(8):1761–9.
View in Google Scholar

Esmaeilzadeh S, Delavar MA, Basirat Z, Shafi H. 2013. Physical activity and body mass index among women who have experienced infertility. Arch Med Sci 9:499–505.
View in Google Scholar

Estill MS, Bolnick JM, Waterland RA, et al.2016. Assisted reproductive technology alters deoxyribonucleic acid methylation profiles in bloodspots of newborn infants. Fertil Steril 106(3):629–39.e610.
View in Google Scholar

Ewald PW. 1994. Evolution of Infectious Disease. New York: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Farquhar C, Marjoribanks J. 2018. Assisted reproductive technology: an overview of cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8: CD010537.
View in Google Scholar

Gerrits T, Van Rooij F, Esho T, Ndegwa W, Goossens J, Bilajbegovic A, et al. 2017. Infertility in the Global South: raising awareness and generating insights for policy and practice. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 9:39–44.
View in Google Scholar

Gosden R, Trasler J, Lucifero D, et al. 2003. Rare congenital disorders, imprinted genes, and assisted reproductive technology. Lancet 361(9373):1975–77.
View in Google Scholar

Hanevik HI, Hessen DO, Sunde A, Breivik J. 2016. Can IVF influence human evolution? Hum Reprod 31(7):1397–402.
View in Google Scholar

Hanopolskyi AI, Smaliak VA, Novichkov AI, Semenov SN. 2021. Autocatalysis: Kinetics, Mechanisms and Design. ChemSystems 3(1): e2000026.
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M, Piontek J. 1975. Biological state index of human groups. Przeglad Antropologiczny 41:191–201.
View in Google Scholar

Henneberg M. 1976. Reproductive possibilities and estimations of the biological dynamics of earlier human populations. Journal of Human Evolution 5:41–8.
View in Google Scholar

Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. 2015. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update 21(4):411–26.
View in Google Scholar

Kalra SK, Barnhart KT. 2011. In vitro fertilization and adverse childhood outcomes: what we know, where we are going, and how we will get there. A glimpse into what lies behind and beckons ahead. Fertil Steril 95(6):1887–89.
View in Google Scholar

Karabulut S, Keskin İ, Kutlu P, Delikara N, Atvar Ö, Öztürk Mİ. 2018. Male infertility, azoozpermia and cryptozoospermia incidence among three infertility clinics in Turkey. Turk J Urol 44(2):109–13.
View in Google Scholar

Keightley PD, Otto SP. 2006. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations. Nature 443:89–92.
View in Google Scholar

Kohan-Ghadr HR, Kadam L, Jain C, et al. 2016. Potential role of epigenetic mechanisms in regulation of trophoblast differentiation, migration, and invasion in the human placenta. Cell Adh Migr 10(1–2):126–35.
View in Google Scholar

Lazaraviciute G, Kauser M, Bhattacharya S, Haggarty P, Bhattacharya S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of DNA methylation levels and imprinting disorders in children conceived by IVF/ICSI compared with children conceived spontaneously. Hum. Reprod. Update 2014;20:840–852.
View in Google Scholar

Le Bouc Y, Rossignol S, Azzi S, et al. 2010. Epigenetics, genomic imprinting and assisted reproductive technology. Ann Endocrinol 71(3):237–238.
View in Google Scholar

Lee YC, Solomon LB, Rűhli FJ et al. 2010. Confirmation of microevolutionary increase in spina bifida occulta among Swiss birth cohorts. Eur Spine J 20:776–80.
View in Google Scholar

Maccani MA, Marsit CJ. 2009. Epigenetics in the placenta. Am J Reprod Immunol 62(2):78–89.
View in Google Scholar

Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA.2012. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med 9(12):e1001356.
View in Google Scholar

Mani S, Ghosh J, Coutifaris C, Sapienza C, Mainigi M. 2020. Epigenetic changes and assisted reproductive technologies. Epigenetics 15(1–2):12–25.
View in Google Scholar

Mastenbroek S, van der Veen F, Aflatoonian A, Shapiro B, Bossuyt P, Repping S. Embryo selection in IVF. 2011. Hum Reprod 5:964–6.
View in Google Scholar

Miles HL, Hofman PL, Peek J, Harris M, Wilson D, et al.2007. In vitro fertilization improves childhood growth and metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 9:3441–5.
View in Google Scholar

Nachtigall RD. 2006. International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil Steril 85:871–75.
View in Google Scholar

Nelissen EC, van Montfoort AP, Dumoulin JC, et al. 2011. Epigenetics and the placenta. Hum Reprod Update 17(3):397–417.
View in Google Scholar

Novakovic B, Lewis S, Halliday J, Kennedy J, Burgner DP, Czajko A, et al. 2019. Assisted reproductive technologies are associated with limited epigenetic variation at birth that largely resolves by adulthood. Nat Commun 10(1):3922. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11929-9.
View in Google Scholar

Olney D, Saniotis A, Henneberg M. 2015. Resource management and the development of Homo. Anthropos 110:563–72.
View in Google Scholar

Ombelet W, Cooke I, Dyer S, Serour G, Devroey P. 2008. Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Hum Reprod Update 6:605–21.
View in Google Scholar

Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, et al. 2012. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 18(5):485–503.
View in Google Scholar

Peterson EWF. 2017. The role of population in economic growth. Sage Open 7(4): 2158244017736094.
View in Google Scholar

Roser M, Ritchie H, Dadonaite B. 2013. Child and infant mortality. Our world in data. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/child-mortality
View in Google Scholar

Saniotis A, Henneberg M, Mohammadi K. 2020. Genetic load and morphological changes to extant humans. J Biosoc Sci. doi:10.1017/S0021932020000413.
View in Google Scholar

Saniotis A, Henneberg M. 2020. Anatomical variations and evolution: re-evaluating their importance for surgeons. ANZ Journal of Surgery. doi: 10.1111/ans.16429.
View in Google Scholar

Saniotis A, Henneberg M. 2013. Evolutionary medicine and future humanity: will evolution have the final word? Humanities 2(2):278–91.
View in Google Scholar

Saniotis A. Henneberg M. 2011. Medicine could be constructing human bodies in the future. Medical Hypothesis 77(4):560–4.
View in Google Scholar

Scherrer U, Rimoldi SF, Rexhaj E, Stuber T, Duplain H, et al. 2012. Systemic and pulmonary vascular dysfunction in children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies. Circulation 15:1890–6.
View in Google Scholar

Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen JG, Nyboe Andersen A. 2012. ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod. Update 18:29–43.
View in Google Scholar

Solomon B, Rűhli FJ, Lee YC, Henneberg M. 2009. Secular trend in the opening of the sacral canal: an Australian study. Spine 34(3):244–48.
View in Google Scholar

Stearns, S., Byars, S., Govindaraju, D. et al. 2010. Measuring selection in contemporary human populations. Nat Rev Genet 11:611–22.
View in Google Scholar

Stephan CN, Henneberg M. 2001. Medicine may be reducing the human capacity to survive. Medical Hypotheses 57(5):633–7.
View in Google Scholar

Strzalko J, Henneberg M. 1982. Hominization as a necessary effect of evolution of a non-genetic mode of hereditary transmission. In: VJA Novak, J Milkovsky, editors. Evolution and Environment. Prague: CSAV Press. 367–76.
View in Google Scholar

Sun H, Gong T, Wu Q. 2019. Global, regional, and national prevalence and disability-adjusted life-years for infertility in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: results from a global burden of disease study, 2017. Aging (Albany NY) 11(23):10952–91.
View in Google Scholar

Thoma M, Fledderjohann J, Cox C, Adage-ba K. R. 2021. Biological and Social Aspects of Human Infertility: A Global Perspective. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health. Retrieved 2 Jul. 2021, from https://oxfordre.com/publichealth/view/10.1093/acre-fore/9780190632366.001.0001/acre-fore-9780190632366-e-184
View in Google Scholar

Tournaye HJ, Cohlen BJ. 2012. Management of male factor infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obs Gyn 26:769–75.
View in Google Scholar

Zhu L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, et al. 2016. Maternal and live-birth outcomes of pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep 6:35141.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Saniotis, A., & Henneberg, M. (2021). Secular changes in human reproduction and assisted reproductive technologies. Anthropological Review, 84(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021-0019

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>