Subjective quality of life of Slovak men with physical disabilities: An age categories differences

Authors

  • Dagmar Nemček Department of Sport Sciences in Educology and Humanities, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021-0017

Keywords:

domains, overall quality of life, satisfaction, dissatisfaction, physical disability, age category, men

Abstract

The objective of the study was to analyze and compare the subjective quality of life (S-QOL) of Slovak men with physical disabilities through satisfaction with the quality of life domains (QOLDs) and the overall quality of life (QOL) assessment. The sample comprised of men with physical disabilities (n = 132), divided into 4 age categories: 19–29 yrs. (n = 59); 30–44 yrs. (n = 26); 45–59 yrs. (n = 24) and over 60 yrs. (n = 23). The Subjective Quality of Life Analysis (S-QUA-L-A) and The World Health Organisation Quality of Life User Manual (WHOQOL User Manual) were used as primary research methods. The findings of this study confirm differences in S-QOL in one QOLD as well as in the overall QOL between two from four age categories of men with physical disabilities. The 19–29 yrs. old men were significantly more satisfied in their lives with the Physical health domains and declared significantly higher overall QOL compare to 45–59 yrs. men. There were no significant differences found in S-QOL between other pair comparisons of the age categories of men with physical disabilities. The highest satisfaction in all age categories of men was declared by the domains of Social relation and Physical health and the highest dissatisfaction by the Psychological health and Environment domains. It is necessary to continue this line of this research field with stress on exploring the ways of psychological health increase as an integral part of S-QOL in men with physical disabilities. Future research should focus on life indicators that saturate the Environment domain, which should be positively affected in mens’ life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avlund K, Lund R, Holstein BE, Due P. 2004. Social relations as determinant of onset of disability in aging. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 38:85–99.
View in Google Scholar

Bakula MA, Kovačevič D, Sarilar M, Palijan Ž, Kovač M. 2011. Quality of life in people with physical disabilities. Coll Antropol 35:247–53.
View in Google Scholar

Davidson G, Irvine R, Corman M, Kee F, Kelly B, Leavey G. et al. 2017. Measuring the quality of life of people with disabilities and their families:Scoping study final report. Belfast:Queen’s University Belfast.
View in Google Scholar

Diaz R, Miller E, Kraus E, Fredericson M. 2019. Impact of adaptive sports participation on quality of life. Sports Med and Arthrosc Rev 27:73–82.
View in Google Scholar

Diener E. 2000. Subjective well-being. Am Psychol 55:34–43.
View in Google Scholar

Diener E, Suh E. 1997. Measuring quality of life:Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Soc Indic Res 40:189–216.
View in Google Scholar

Fuhrer MJ, Rintala DH, Hart KA, Clearman R, Young ME. 1992. Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73:552–7.
View in Google Scholar

Giacobbi PR, Stancil M, Hardin B, Bryant L. 2008. Physical activity and quality of life experienced by highly active individuals with physical disabilities. Adapt Phys Activ Q 25:189–207.
View in Google Scholar

Groff DG, Lundberg NR, Zabriskie RB. 2009. Influence of adapted sport on quality of life:Perception of athletes with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 31:318–26.
View in Google Scholar

Kim M, Jasper AD, Lee J, Won H. 2021. Work, leisure and life satisfaction for employees with physical disabilities in South Korea. Appl Res Qual Life 1:1–19.
View in Google Scholar

Kuvalekar K, Kamath R, Ashok L, Shetty B, Mayya s & Chandrasekaran V. 2015. Quality of life among persons with physical disabilities in Udupi Taluk:A cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care 4:69–73.
View in Google Scholar

Ladecká P, Nemček D, Harčaríková T. 2019. Subjective well-being of students attending the special vocational school for children with physical disabilities:Gender differences. Ad Alta 9:427–31.
View in Google Scholar

Leutar Z, Štambuk A, Rusak S. 2007. Social policy and quality of life of elderly persons with physical disability. Rev za Soc Politiku 14:327–46.
View in Google Scholar

Levasseur M, Desrosiers J, St-Cyr Tribble D. 2008. Subjective quality-of-life predictors for older adults with physical disabilities. Am J Phys Med and Rehabil 87:830–41.
View in Google Scholar

Martin J, Guerrero M, Snapp E. 2020. Disability and sport psychology. In:G Tenenbaum and RC Eklund, editors. Handbook of sport psychology. New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1152–68.
View in Google Scholar

Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs and Family of the Slovak Republic, 2020. Report on the social situation of the population of the Slovak Republic in 2019. [pdf] Bratislava:Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs and Family of the Slovak Republic. Available at:https://www.employment.gov.sk/files/slovensky/ministerstvo/analyticke-centrum/2020/sprava_o_soc_situ-acii_obyvatelstva_sr_2019.pdf [Accessed 20 February 2021].
View in Google Scholar

Morack J, Infurna FJ, Ram N, Gerstorf D. 2013. Trajectories and personality correlates of change in perception of physical and mental health across adulthood and old age. Int J Behav Dev 37:475–84.
View in Google Scholar

Nemček D. 2016a. Quality of life of people with disabilities:differences in satisfaction with indicators and domains between active and inactive individuals. Phys Activ Rev 4:62–71.
View in Google Scholar

Nemček D. 2016b. Quality of life of people with disabilities from a sport participation point of view. Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae 56:77–92.
View in Google Scholar

Nemček D. 2020. Indicators and domains of the quality of life in active and inactive men with health impairments. 1st edition. Bratislava:Slovak Scientific Society for Physical Education and Sports.
View in Google Scholar

Nemček D, Labudová J, Peráčková J, Bendíková E, Medeková H, Pavlíková A. et al. 2011. Quality of life of seniors and physical activity as part of it. 1st edition. Prešov:Michal Vaško Publishing.
View in Google Scholar

Nemček D, Mókušová O. 2020. Position of sport in subjective quality of life of deaf people with different sport participation levels. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research 87:1–8.
View in Google Scholar

Nemček D, Wittmannová J, Javanainen-Levonen T, Lubkowska W. 2020. Subjective perception of the life quality among men with physical disabilities with different sport participation levels. Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Come-nianae 60:194–206.
View in Google Scholar

Nemček J. 2020. Gender differences in subjective quality of life of elite and competitive sports game players. Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Come-nianae 60:105–16.
View in Google Scholar

PAHO. 2021. Healthy aging and non-communicable diseases. Available at:https://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9979:healthy-aging-non-communicable-diseases&Itemid=40721&lang=en
View in Google Scholar

Patrick DL, Morgan M, Charlton JRH. 1986. Psychosocial support and change in the health status of physically disabled people. Soc Sci Med 22:1347–54.
View in Google Scholar

Post MWM. 2014. Definition of quality of life:What has happened and how to move on. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 20:167–80.
View in Google Scholar

Repková K, Kešelová D, Ondrušová D. 2016. Development of the social situation of people with disabilities and their families:Secondary research analysis. [pdf] Bratislava:Institute for Work and Family Research. Available at:https://www.employment.gov.sk/files/slovensky/rodina-socialna-pomoc/tazke-zdravotne-pos-tihnutie/vyvoj_socialnej_situacie_osob_so_zp_ivpr_2016.pdf [Accessed 22 February 2021].
View in Google Scholar

Sherrill C. 1997. Disability, identity, and involvement in sport and exercise. In:KR Fox, editor. The physical self:From motivation to wellbeing. 1st edition. Champagne, IL:Human Kinetics Press. 257–86.
View in Google Scholar

Sőrés A, Pető K. 2015. Measuring of subjective quality of life. Procedia Econ Financ 32:809–16.
View in Google Scholar

Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic. 2020. Selected indicators of the social situation of people with disabilities. [pdf] Bratislava:Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic. Available at:https://slovak.statistics.sk/wps/wcm/connect/22e52b51-b30c-4497-9ff0-588ac017f72d/Vybrane_indikatory_socialnej_situacie_osob_so_zdravotnym_postihnutim_2019.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=n0gd-D9O&CVID=n0gdD9O [Accessed 22 February 2021].
View in Google Scholar

Tough H, Siegrist J, Fekete CH. 2017. Social relationships, mental health and wellbeing in physical disability:A systematic review. BMC Public Health 17:414.
View in Google Scholar

Turner RJ, Lloyd DA, Taylor J. 2006. Physical disability and mental health:An epidemiology of psychiatric and substance disorders. Rehabil Psychol 51:214–23.
View in Google Scholar

Turner RJ, McLean PD. 1989. Physical disability and psychological distress. Rehabil Psychol 34:225–42.
View in Google Scholar

Verbrugge LM. 1983. Multiple roles and physical health of women and men. J Health Soc Behav 24:16–30.
View in Google Scholar

Villas-Boas S, Oliveira AL, Ramos N, Montero I. 2019. Predictors of quality of life in different age groups across adulthood. J Intergener Relatsh 17:42–57.
View in Google Scholar

WHO. 2011. World Report on Disability. [pdf] Geneva:WHO Publishing Committee, The World Bank. Available at:https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf
View in Google Scholar

WHO. 2020. Disability and Health. Available at:https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
View in Google Scholar

WHO. 2021. Assistive Technology. Available at:https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology
View in Google Scholar

WHOQOL User Manual. 2012. Programme on Mental Health. [pdf] Geneva:World Health Organization. Available at:https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/77932/WHO_HIS_HSI_Rev.2012.03_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Accessed 22 February 2021].
View in Google Scholar

Worldometer. 2021. Slovakia Population. United Nations data. Available at:https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/slovakia-population/
View in Google Scholar

Zannotti M, Pringuey D. 1992. A method for quality of life assessment in psychiatry:The S-QUA-L-A (Subjective QUAlity of Life Analysis). Quality of Life Newsletter 4.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Nemček, D. (2021). Subjective quality of life of Slovak men with physical disabilities: An age categories differences. Anthropological Review, 84(3), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021-0017

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.