Olfactory processing and odor specificity: a meta-analysis of menstrual cycle variation in olfactory sensitivity

Lenka Martinec Nováková; Jan Havlíček; S. Craig Roberts

doi:10.2478/anre-2014-0024

Authors

Lenka Martinec Nováková Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, U Křĭže 8, 158 00, Prague 5, Czech Republic; Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Jan Havlíček Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
S. Craig Roberts School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2014-0024

Keywords:

menstrual cycle, mate choice, odor threshold, human oestrus, olfaction

Abstract

Cycle-correlated variation in olfactory threshold, with women becoming more sensitive to odors mid-cycle, is somewhat supported by the literature but the evidence is not entirely consistent, with several studies finding no, or mixed, effects. It has been argued that cyclic shifts in olfactory threshold might be limited to odors relevant to the mating context. We aimed to test whether the evidence currently available points in the direction of odor-specific or, rather, general changes in olfactory sensitivity and, if the former is the case, to what group of odorants in particular. We carried out a meta-analysis of relevant studies which together used a variety of different odorants, including some found in food, body odor, and some that occur in neither of these. First we tested whether there appears to be an overall effect when all studies are included. Next, we hypothesised that if cyclic changes in olfactory processing are odor-specific and tuned to biologically relevant odors, we should find changes in detection thresholds only for odorants found in body odor, or for those that are perceptually similar to it. In contrast, if threshold patterns are linked to more general fluctuations in odor processing across the cycle, we would not expect changes in relation to any particular odorant group. The results support the view that there is significant cycle-correlated variation. Thresholds were in general significantly lower in the fertile than the non-fertile phases, with effect sizes consistently in this direction. This same conclusion applied to both ‘food’ and ‘musky’ odorants, despite their different evolutionary significance, and to the androgen steroids (androstadienone, androstenone, and androsterone), but could not be applied to phenyl-ethyl alcohol. The results indicate that olfactory sensitivity may be a non-adaptive by-product of the general physiological fluctuations or differences in neural processing experienced across the cycle to a broad spectrum of odorants, rather than being specifically selected for mate choice-related odors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amoore JE, Popplewell JR, Whissell-Buechy D. 1975. Sensitivity of women to musk odor: no menstrual variation. J Chem Ecol 1(3):291–97.
View in Google Scholar

Arctander S. 1969. Perfume and Flavor Chemicals: (aroma Chemicals). Montclair, NJ: TheAuthor.
View in Google Scholar

Becker D, Creutzfeldt OD, Schwibbe M, Wuttke W. 1982. Changes in physiological, EEG and psychological parameters in women during the spontaneous menstrual-cycle and following oral-contraceptives. Psychoneuroendocrinology 7(1):75–90.
View in Google Scholar

Bedoukian. Safety Data Sheet [Internet]. Danbury, CT: Bedoukian Research.
View in Google Scholar

Bedoukian PZ. 1986. Perfumery and flavoring synthetics. Wheaton, IL: Allured Publishing Corp.
View in Google Scholar

Bremner EA, Mainland JD, Khan RM, Sobel N. 2003. The prevalence of androstenone anosmia. Chem Senses 28(5):423–32.
View in Google Scholar

Burdock GA. 2009. Fenaroli’s Handbook of Flavor Ingredients, Sixth Edition. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
View in Google Scholar

Caruso S, Grillo C, Agnello C, Maiolino L, Intelisano G, Serra A. 2001. A prospective study evidencing rhinomanometric and olfactometric outcomes in women taking oral contraceptives. Hum Reprod 16(11):2288–94.
View in Google Scholar

De Rovira D. 2008. Dictionary of Flavors. Ames, IA: John Wiley & Sons.
View in Google Scholar

Doty RL. 1979. Procedure for combining menstrual cycle data. J Clin Endocr Metab 48(6):912–18.
View in Google Scholar

Doty RL, Cameron EL. 2009. Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception. Physiol Behav 97(2):213–28.
View in Google Scholar

Doty RL, Gregor TP, Settle RG. 1986. Influence of Intertrial Interval and Sniff-Bottle Volume on Phenyl Ethyl-Alcohol Odor Detection Thresholds. Chem Senses 11(2):259–64.
View in Google Scholar

Doty RL, Hall JW, Flickinger GL, Sondheimer SJ. 1982. Cyclic changes in olfactory and auditory sensitivity during the menstrual cycle: no attenuation by oral contraceptive medication. In: W Breipohl, editor. Olfaction and endocrine regulation. London: IRL Press. 35–42.
View in Google Scholar

Doty RL, McKeown DA, Lee WW, Shaman P. 1995. A study of the test-retest reliability of ten olfactory tests. Chem Senses 20(6):645–56.
View in Google Scholar

Doty RL, Snyder PJ, Huggins GR, Lowry LD. 1981. Endocrine, cardiovascular, and psychological correlated of olfactory sensitivity changes during the human menstrual cycle. J Comp Physiol Psych 95(1):45–60.
View in Google Scholar

Dye L. 1992. Visual information processing and the menstrual cycle. In: JTE Richardson, editor. Cognition and the menstrual cycle. New York: Springer Verlag. 67–97.
View in Google Scholar

Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1998. Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proc R Soc B 265(1399):927–33.
View in Google Scholar

Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 2008. Human oestrus. Proc R Soc B 275(1638):991–1000.
View in Google Scholar

Good PR, Geary N, Engen T. 1976. The effect of estrogen on odor detection. Chem Senses 2(1):45–50.
View in Google Scholar

Gower DB, Nixon A, Mallet AI. 1998. The significance of odorous steroids in axillary odour. In: S Van Toller and Dodd GH, editors. Perfumery. London: Chapman &Hall. 47–75.
View in Google Scholar

Grillo C, La Mantia I, Triolo C, Scollo A, La Boria A, Intelisano G, Caruso S. 2001. Rhinomanometric and olfactometric variationsthroughout the menstrual cycle. Ann Oto Rhinol Laryn 110(8):785–89.
View in Google Scholar

Havlícek J, Roberts SC, Flegr J. 2005. Women’s preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters 1(3):256–59.
View in Google Scholar

Hedges LV, Olkin I. 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis New York: Academic Press.
View in Google Scholar

Hummel T, Gollisch R, Wildt G, Kobal G. 1991. Changes in olfactory perception during the menstrual cycle. Experientia 47(7):712–15.
View in Google Scholar

Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. 1997. ‘Sniffin’ Sticks’: Olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22(1):39–52.
View in Google Scholar

Jacob TJC, Wang LW, Jaffer S, McPhee S. 2006. Changes in the odor quality of androstadienone during exposure-induced sensitization. Chem Senses 31(1):3–8.
View in Google Scholar

Keller A, Vosshall LB. 2004. Human olfactory psychophysics. Curr Biol 14(20):R875-R878.
View in Google Scholar

Kuga M, Ikeda M, Suzuki K. 1999. Gustatory changes associated with the menstrual cycle. Physiol Behav 66(2):317–22.
View in Google Scholar

Le Magnen J. 1952. Les phénoménes olfacto-sexuels chez l’homme. Archives des Sciences Physiologiques 6:125–60.
View in Google Scholar

Lundström JN, McClintock MK, Olsson MJ. 2005. Effects of reproductive state on olfactory sensitivity suggest odor specificity. Biol Psychol 71(3):244–47.
View in Google Scholar

Mair RG, Bouffard JA, Engen T, Morton TH. 1978. Olfactory sensitivity during the menstrual cycle. Sensory Processes 2(2):90–98.
View in Google Scholar

McNeil J, Cameron JD, Finlayson G, Blundell JE, Doucet E. 2013. Greater overall olfactory performance, explicit wanting for high fat foods and lipid intake during the mid-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Physiol Behav 112:84–89.
View in Google Scholar

Navarrete-Palacios E, Hudson R, Reyes-Guerrero G, Guevara-Guzmán R. 2003. Lower olfactory threshold during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. Biol Psychol 63(3):269–79.
View in Google Scholar

NCBI. 2014. PubChem. 2004 ed. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information.
View in Google Scholar

Pause BM, Sojka B, Krauel K, Fehm Wolfsdorf G, Ferstl R. 1996. Olfactory information processing during the course of the menstrual cycle. Biol Psychol 44(1):31–54.
View in Google Scholar

Purdon SE, Klein S, Flor-Henry P. 2001. Menstrual effects on asymmetrical olfactory acuity. J Int Neuropsych Soc 7(6):703-09.
View in Google Scholar

Raghava GPS. 2011. DrugPedia: A Wikipedia for Drug Discovery. Chandigarh, India.
View in Google Scholar

Renfro KJ, Hoffmann H. 2013. The relationship between oral contraceptive use and sensitivity to olfactory stimuli. Horm Behav 63(3):491–96.
View in Google Scholar

Rosenthal R. 1991. Meta-analytical procedures for social research. London: Sage.
View in Google Scholar

Rosenthal R, DiMatteo MR. 2001. Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annu Rev Psychol 52:59–82.
View in Google Scholar

Rusak B, Zucker I. 1979. Neural regulation of circadian rhythms. Physiol Rev 59(3):449–526.
View in Google Scholar

Saxton TK, Lyndon A, Little AC, Roberts SC. 2008. Evidence that androstadienone, a putative human chemosignal, modulates women’s attributions of men’s attractiveness. Horm Behav 54(5):597–601.
View in Google Scholar

Schmidt H. 1990. Methods of meta-analysis. London: Sage.
View in Google Scholar

Stevens JC, Cain WS, Burke RJ. 1988. Variability of olfactory thresholds. Chemi Senses 13(4):643–53.
View in Google Scholar

Sueda K, Arao Y, Nishida N. 2003. Changes in olfactory perception for androstenone during the menstrual cycle. Aroma Research 4:51–55.
View in Google Scholar

Vierling J, Rock J. 1967. Variations in olfactory sensitivity to exaltolide during the menstrual cycle. J Appl Physiol 22(2):311–15.
View in Google Scholar

Vo UUT, Morris MP. 2014. Nonvolatile, semivolatile, or volatile: Redefining volatile for volatile organic compounds. J Air Waste Manage 64(6):661–69.
View in Google Scholar

Whissell-Buechy D, Amoore JE. 1973. Odour-blindness to musk: simple recessive inheritance. Nature 242(5395):271–73.
View in Google Scholar

Wolf FM. 1986. Meta-analysis quantitative methods for research synthesis London: Sage.
View in Google Scholar

Wysocki CJ, Beauchamp GK. 1984. Ability to smell androstenone is genetically determined PNAS Biol Sci 81(15):4899–902.
View in Google Scholar