Facial attractiveness and lip morphology of Caucasian women
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2018-0035Keywords:
lips, woman, attractiveness, averagenessAbstract
Human lips are one of the most sexually dimorphic facial features. Although lip morphology is considered particularly important for female facial attractiveness no systematic empirical study has been conducted in this respect. This study aimed to investigate a relationship between female Caucasian facial attractiveness and their lip morphology. Two series of morphologically average composite portraits with digitally increased and decreased lip width and height measurements were assessed by adult men and women. Results were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA. When compared to the average lip shape both a decrease and an increase in lip width were associated with lower female facial attractiveness.
A systematic increase in lip height from the lowest values to the highest, was associated with an increase in attractiveness scores. Attractiveness assessments of men and women did not differ significantly. The results show that perception of lip attractiveness may be intersexually congruent and that a variation in lip morphology may significantly affect female facial attractiveness.
Downloads
References
Alley TR, Cunningham MR. 1991. Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychol Sci 2:123–5.
View in Google Scholar
Baudouin JY, Tiberghien G. 2004. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol 117:313–32.
View in Google Scholar
Bisson M, Grobbelaar A. 2004. The esthetic properties of lips: A comparison of models and nonmodels. Angle Orthod 74:162–6.
View in Google Scholar
Burriss RP, Little AC, Nelson EC. 2007. 2D:4D and sexually dimorphic facial characteristics. Arch Sex Behav 36:377–84.
View in Google Scholar
Caisey L, Gubanova E, Camus C, Lapatina N, Smetnik V, Lévêque JL. 2008. Influence of age and hormone replacement therapy on the functional properties of the lips. Skin Res Technol 14:220–5.
View in Google Scholar
Danel D. 2008. Stopień maskulinizacji twarzy męskich jako wskaźnik atrakcyjności w kontekście wybranych parametrów jakości partnera w ocenie kobiet. Ph. D. Thesis: Uniwersytet Wrocławski.
View in Google Scholar
Danel D, Pawlowski B. 2007. Eye-mouth-eye angle as a good indicator of face masculinization, asymmetry, and attractiveness (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 121:221– 5.
View in Google Scholar
Danel D, Pawłowski B. 2009. Biologiczne znaczenie atrakcyjności twarzy, in: B Pawłowski, editor. Biologia Atrakcyjności. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa, pp. 166–205.
View in Google Scholar
Farkas L. 1981. Anthropometry of the head and face in medicine. New York: Elsevier.
View in Google Scholar
Field A. 2005. Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.).
View in Google Scholar
Folstad I, Karter AJ. 1992. Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat 139:603.
View in Google Scholar
Frąckiewicz W. 2001. The aesthetics of the eyes and mouth position in three-point face schema. Anthropol Rev 64: 93–100.
View in Google Scholar
Galton F. 1878. Composite portraits. Nature 18:97–100.
View in Google Scholar
Giannoni E, Guignard L,Reymond MK, Perreau M, Roth-Kleiner M, Calandra T, Roger T. 2011. Estradiol and progesterone strongly inhibit the innate immune response of mononuclear cells in newborns. Infect Immun 79:2690–8.
View in Google Scholar
Guéguen N. 2012. Does red lipstick really attract men? An evaluation in a bar. Int J Psychol Stud 4:206–209.
View in Google Scholar
Guéguen N, Jacob C. 2012. Lipstick and tipping behavior: When red lipstick enhance waitresses tips. Int J Hosp Manag 31:1333– 5.
View in Google Scholar
Hassebrauck M. 1998. The visual process method: A new method to study physical attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 19:111–23.
View in Google Scholar
Jansson L, Holmdahl R. 1998. Estrogen-mediated immunosuppression in autoimmune diseases. Inflamm Res 47:290–301.
View in Google Scholar
Jones D, Hill K. 1993. Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Hum Nat 4:271–96.
View in Google Scholar
Kanda N, Tsuchida T, Tamaki K. 1996. Testosterone inhibits immunoglobulin production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clin Exp Immunol 106:410–5.
View in Google Scholar
Klein AW. 2005. In Search of the Perfect Lip: 2005. Dermatologic Surg. 31:1599–603.
View in Google Scholar
Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S. 2009. Averageness or symmetry: Which is more important for facial attractiveness? Acta Psychol (Amst) 131:136–42.
View in Google Scholar
Kościński K. 2008a. Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences. Anthropol Rev 70:45–79.
View in Google Scholar
Kościński K. 2008b. Facial attractiveness: Variation, adaptiveness and consequences of facial preferences. Anthropol Rev 71:77– 105.
View in Google Scholar
Langlois JH, Roggman LA. 1990. Attractive faces are only average. Psychol Sci 1:115–21.
View in Google Scholar
Langlois JH, Roggman LA, Musselman L. 1994. What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychol Sci 5:214–20.
View in Google Scholar
Lewandowski Z. 2011. Changes in selected features of a male face and assessment of their influence on facial recognition. Anthropol Anz 68:323–37.
View in Google Scholar
Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM. 2011. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:1638–59.
View in Google Scholar
Michiels G, Sather AH. 1994. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 9:95–103.
View in Google Scholar
Penton-Voak I, Perrett D. 2000. Consistency and individual differences in facial attractiveness judgements: an evolutionary perspective. Soc Res (New York) 67:219–44.
View in Google Scholar
Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S, Burt DM, Henzi SP, Castles DL, Akamatsu S. 1998. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394:884–7.
View in Google Scholar
Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S. 1994. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368:239–42.
View in Google Scholar
Peters M, Rhodes G, Simmons LW. 2007. Contributions of the face and body to overall attractiveness. Anim Behav 73:937–42.
View in Google Scholar
Rhodes G. 2006. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol 57:199– 226.
View in Google Scholar
Rhodes G, Yoshikawa S, Clark A, Kieran L, McKay R, Akamatsu S. 2001. Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception 30: 611–25.
View in Google Scholar
Rowland DA, Perrett DI. 1995. Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 15:70–6.
View in Google Scholar
Salem ML. 2004. Estrogen, a double-edged sword: modulation of TH1- and TH2-mediated inflammations by differential regulation of TH1/TH2 cytokine production. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy 3:97– 104.
View in Google Scholar
Samal A, Subramani V, Marx D. 2007. Analysis of sexual dimorphism in human face. J Vis Commun Image Represent 18:453–63.
View in Google Scholar
Sforza C, Grandi G, Binelli M, Dolci C, De Menezes M, Ferrario VF. 2010. Age- and sex-related changes in three-dimensional lip morphology. Forensic Sci Int. 200. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.050.
View in Google Scholar
Tanner J. 1989. Foetus into man : physical growth from conception to maturity. Castlemead Publications, Ware.
View in Google Scholar
Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 1999. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci 3:452–60.
View in Google Scholar
Thornhill R, Grammer K. 1999. The body and face of woman: one ornament that signals quality? Evol Hum Behav 20:105–120.
View in Google Scholar
Thornhill R, Møller AP. 1997. Developmental stability, disease and medicine. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 72:497–548.
View in Google Scholar
Tiddeman B, Burt M, Perrett D. 2001. Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 21:42–50.
View in Google Scholar
Verdonck A, Gaethofs M, Carels C, De Zegher F. 1999. Effect of low-dose testosterone treatment on craniofacial growth in boys with delayed puberty. Eur J Orthod 21:137–43.
View in Google Scholar
Wedekind C, Folstad I. 1994. Adaptive or nonadaptive immunosuppression by sex hormones? Am Nat 143:936.
View in Google Scholar
Yesilova Z, Ozata M, Kocar IH, Turan M, Pekel A, Sengul A, Ozdemír IC. 2000. The effects of gonadotropin treatment on the immunological features of male patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:66–70.
View in Google Scholar
Zahavi A. 1977. The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). J Theor Biol 67:603–5.
View in Google Scholar
Zahavi A. 1975. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–14.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Anthropological Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
