Rozwój zrównoważony w perspektywie deontologicznej

Autor

  • Adam Płachciak Wrocław University of Economics, Faculty of Economy, Management and Tourism in Jelenia Góra
  • Dative Mukarutesi The National University of Rwanda, Department of Accounting

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.23.1.05

Słowa kluczowe:

sustainable development, ethics, deontolog, human needs, Planetary boundaries, equity

Abstrakt

The idea of sustainable development as a normative concept emphasizes the necessity for a wider consensus on meeting human needs, ensuring social equity, and respecting planetary boundaries. The purpose of the article focuses on the deontological orientation in perceiving sustainable development. It is expected that looking at sustainability from the deontological perspective might increase individuals’ awareness of responsibility towards respecting the needs of the world’s poor, environmental boundaries, and moral equity, which emphasizes that all people are equal. Any attempt to achieve sustainability demands, first of all, rational action placed on moral duties/obligations before individual people or institutions can achieve their particular desires and goals. According to this perspective, sustainability should be treated as a prior constraint in obtaining economic maximization.

Bibliografia

Buchanan, J. M. (1987). Justice and Charity. Ethics, 87(3), 558–575.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/292866

Crocker, D. A., & Robeyns, I. (2010). Capability and Agency. In Ch. Morris, Amartya Sen. Contemporary Philosophy Focus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.
Google Scholar

Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21500-3

Dworkin, R. (1981). What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(4), 283–345.
Google Scholar

Ecosystems and Human Well-Being – Synthesis. A Report of the Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Washington (DC): Island Press.
Google Scholar

Gough, I. (2015). Climate Change and sustainable welfare. The Centrality of Human Needs. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5), 1191–1214.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev039

Hallsmith, G. (2003). The Key to Sustainable Cities. Meeting Human Needs. Transforming Community Systems. Gambriola: New Society Publishers.
Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1955). Are There Any Natural Rights. Philosophical Review, 64(2), 175–191.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2182586

Human Environment. Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. (1982). New York–Geneva: United Nations.
Google Scholar

Jones, H. (2009). Equity in Development. Why It is Important and How to Achieve It. London: Overseas Development Institute.
Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1997). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809590

Klosko, G. (1994). Political Obligation and the Natural Duties of Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23(3), 251–270.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1994.tb00013.x

Leinfelder, R. (2013). Assuming Responsibility for the Anthropocene. Challenges and Opportunities in Education. In H. Trischler (Ed.), Anthropocene. Envisioning the Future of the Age of Humans. Munich: Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society.
Google Scholar

Matviychuk, A. (2014). Ecological Deontology in the Context of Solving the Task of Ecologization of Modern Man Thinking. Problems of Sustainable Development, 9(1), 151–156.
Google Scholar

McNaughton, D., & Rawling, P. (2007). Deontology. In D. Copp (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325911.003.0016

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. The Report for the Club of Rome’s on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.1

Mills, M. (2001). The Duty of Being and Association. In J. Berry, & M. Wissenburg (Eds.), Sustaining Liberal Democracy. Ecological Challenges and Opportunities. London: Palgrave Publishers.
Google Scholar

Nagel, Th. (1991). Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Nozick, R. (2000). Anarchia, państwo, utopia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Aletheia.
Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (2005). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development “Our Common Future.” (1987). Norway/Oslo: The United Nations General Assembly.
Google Scholar

Research for Social Change Transformation to Equity and Sustainability – UNRISD Strategy 2016–2020. (2015). Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Google Scholar

Roberts, N. (1997). The Holocene. An Environmental History. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Google Scholar

Robeyns, I. (2005). The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266

Robeyns, I. (2006). Capability Approach in Practice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351–376.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x

Rockström, J., Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, III, F. S., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., De Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Sociology, 14(2), 472–475.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232

Scanlon, Th. (2000). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv134vmrn

Saja, K. (2015). Etyka normatywna. Między konsekwencalizmem a deontologią. Kraków: Universitas.
Google Scholar

Sen, A. (1982). Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Sen, A. (2006). Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Sen, A., & Williams, B. (1990). Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

The Nicomachean Ethics. (2009). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary. (2015). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2020-03-30

Jak cytować

Płachciak, A., & Mukarutesi, D. (2020). Rozwój zrównoważony w perspektywie deontologicznej. Annales. Etyka W Życiu Gospodarczym, 23(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.23.1.05

Numer

Tom 23 Nr 1 (2020)

Dział

Artykuł

Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC