Nowe dylematy medycyny – zjawisko macierzyństwa zastępczego w perspektywie społeczno-etycznej
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.12.2.03Słowa kluczowe:
surrogate motherhood, procreation, medicine, in vitro fertilization, ethicsAbstrakt
Contemporary medicine offers more and more possibilities as far as procreation is concerned. They are available, first of all, to infertile couples (IVF – In Vitro Fertilization). However, the advanced reproductive technology is also used by people who are biologically capable of having children. These people are ready to resign voluntarily from pregnancy and childbirth difficulties. The surrogate motherhood appears as a phenomenon known already from biblical times but existing nowadays in a different context. At the same time, some issues are emerging – questions concerning social, ethical, moral and legal consequences. This paper presents the issue of surrogate motherhood in the context of social changes, which could lead to a development of such practices as well as the reasons of parents and surrogate mothers. Can this phenomenon be perceived as a service for people who want to fulfill their desires for having children? Would surrogate motherhood become a socially approved practice? What are the ethical, religious and legal norms concerning this phenomenon? The religious norms are connected, first of all, with an attitude of the Catholic Church which recognizes surrogacy as unacceptable and states that “it offends the dignity and the right of a child to be conceived, carried in the womb, delivered to the world and brought up by their own parents”. The ethical norms refer to the biotechnological issues and include matters of creating and implanting human embryos as well as the problem of the surrogate mother – child – biological parents relationship. As far as legal norms are concerned, the case is still open hence Polish law does not take into consideration in vitro fertilization or the admissibility of surrogate motherhood.
Bibliografia
Ali R., R. Kelley, Matki nie swoich dzieci, „Newsweek Polska” 2008, nr 16.
Google Scholar
Baker R., Seks w przyszłości. Spotkanie pierwotnych popędów z technologią jutra, Rebis, Poznań 2002.
Google Scholar
Ber R., Ethical Issues in Gestational Surrogacy, „Theoretical Medicine” 2000 nr 2.
Google Scholar
Bielawska-Batorowicz E., Poland: Provision and Guidelines for Third Party Assisted Conception [w:] Third Party Assisted Conception Across Cultures: Social, Legal and Ethical Perspectives, red. E. Blyth, R. Landau, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London–New York 2004.
Google Scholar
Buyx A.M., Be Careful what You Wish for? Theoretical and Ethical Aspects of Wish-fulfilling Medicine, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2007.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9111-1
Dolnick S., Pregnancy becomes latest job outsourced in India, http://wyborcza.pl/1,76842,3989459.html.
Google Scholar
Haberko J., Obowiązki lekarza ginekologa stosującego techniki prokreacji wspomaganej medycznie, „Ginekologia Praktyczna” 2005, nr 83, tom II.
Google Scholar
Kowalska D., I. Michalewicz, Brzuch do wynajęcia, „Newsweek” 2004.
Google Scholar
Pismo Święte, Księga Rodzaju.
Google Scholar
Raport CBOS, BS/11/2008, Opinie o dopuszczalności stosowania zapłodnienia pozaustrojowego, styczeń 2008.
Google Scholar
Siedlecka E., Co wolno z in vitro, „Gazeta Wyborcza” 2008, nr 41.
Google Scholar
Tokarczyk R., Prawa narodzin, życia i śmierci, Zakamycze, Kraków 2000.
Google Scholar
Zuber M., Wybrane teorie komunikowania masowego i próby ich empirycznej weryfikacji, [w:] Studia z teorii komunikowania masowego, red. B. Dobek-Ostrowska, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 1999.
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.