Ethics, Uncertainty, and Macroeconomics

Autor

  • Mariusz Maziarz Wrocław University of Economics, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.4.04

Słowa kluczowe:

uncertainty, monetary policy, fiscal policy, recession, macroeconomics

Abstrakt

In this article, I focus on the difference in moral judgment of macroeconomic interventions between the deterministic world of a thought experiment and the uncertain reality. The macroeconomic theory coined by Keynes is, in its most popular reading, deterministic and justifies interventionism. However, incorporating uncertainty into the analysis leads to the contrary result. Namely, if economic output is a random process, such as Gaussian white noise or a stochastic Markov chain, then intervening can bring either economic recovery or inflationary pressure and a next bubble. In the trolley‑problem philosophy, the one who pulls the lever instead of the trolley itself is believed to be guilty of the death of an innocent passer‑by standing on the side track. Similarly, if the Federal Reserve decided to intervene and failed (causing a bubble on the house market, instantiating), their monetary policy can be said to be a cause of the financial crisis. Therefore, governments should refrain from interventions.

Bibliografia

Acharya V. et al., The Financial Crisis of 2007–2009: Causes and Remedies, “Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments” 2009, Vol. 18(2), pp. 89–137.
Google Scholar

Aikman D., Ph. Barrett, S. Kapadia et al., Uncertainty in macroeconomic policy‑making: art. or science?, “Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society” 2011, Vol. 369, pp. 4798–4817.
Google Scholar

Barro R.J., Keynesian Economics vs. Regular Economics, “The Wall Street Journal”, 23rd August 2011.
Google Scholar

Barsky R., L. Kilian, Do We Really Know that Oil Caused the Great Stagflation? A Monetary Alternative, “NBER Macroeconomics Annual” 2001, No. 16.
Google Scholar

Cathcart Th., The Trolley Problem, or Would You Throw the Fat Guy Off the Bridge? A Philosophical Conundrum, Workman Publishing, New York 2013.
Google Scholar

Chugh S., Modern Macroeconomics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 2015.
Google Scholar

Foot Ph., The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect, “Oxford Review” 1967, No. 5.
Google Scholar

Greene J. et al., Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment, “Cognition” 2009, Vol. 111(3), pp. 364–371.
Google Scholar

Han J., A. Saptawijaya, L. Pereira, Moral reasoning under uncertainty, “International Conference on Logic for Programming Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning”, Springer, Berlin 2012.
Google Scholar

Keynes J., A Treatise on Probability, Dover Publications, Mineola 2013.
Google Scholar

Klein L., IS‑LM Model: Its Role in Macroeconomics [in:] IS‑LM and Modern Macroeconomics, eds. W. Young, B. Zilberfarb, Springer, Tel Aviv 2012.
Google Scholar

Knight F., Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Dover Publications, New York 2012.
Google Scholar

Krugman P., Fighting Off Depression, “The New York Times”, 5th January 2009, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=0 (retrieved: 26th September 2009).
Google Scholar

Lanteri A., Ch. Chelini, S. Rizzello, An Experimental Investigation of Emotions and Reasoning in the Trolley Problem, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2008, Vol. 83, pp. 789–804.
Google Scholar

Lucas R., The other‑worldly philosophers, “The Economist”, 16th July 2009, http://www.economist.com/node/14030288 (retrieved: 26th September 2009).
Google Scholar

Mäki U., Modelling failure [in:] H. Leitgeb, I. Niiniluoto et al., Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science – Proceedings of the 15th International Congress, College Publications, Helsinki2016.
Google Scholar

Malkiel B., E. Fama, Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, “The Journal of Finance” 1970 , Vol. 25(2), pp. 383–417.
Google Scholar

Mankiw G., Principles of Microeconomics, Cengage Learning, New York 2008.
Google Scholar

Maziarz M., The Reinhart‑Rogoff controversy as an instance of the ‘emerging contrary result’ phenomenon, “Journal of Economic Methodology” 2017, Vol. 24(3), pp. 213–225.
Google Scholar

Perkins J.O.N., The Reform of Macroeconomic Policy. From stagflation to Low or Zero Inflation, Palgrave MacMillan, Melbourne 2016.
Google Scholar

Posner R., The Economics of Justice, Harvard University Press, Harvard 1983.
Google Scholar

Shiller R., The Subprime Solution: How Today’s Global Financial Crisis Happened, and what to Do about it, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2012.
Google Scholar

Stiglitz J.E., Rethinking Macroeconomics: What Failed, and how to Repair It?, “Journal of the European Economic Association” 2011, Vol. 9(4), pp. 591–645.
Google Scholar

Thomson J., The Trolley Problem, “The Yale Law Journal” 1985, Vol. 94(6), pp. 1395–1415.
Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2018-02-19

Jak cytować

Maziarz, M. (2018). Ethics, Uncertainty, and Macroeconomics. Annales. Etyka W Życiu Gospodarczym, 20(4), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.4.04

Numer

Dział

Artykuł