Unethical Behaviour of Organisations from a Social Network Perspective. A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.19.4.02Keywords:
unethical behaviours, network, interorganisational relationships, social networksAbstract
One of the distinctive features of contemporary organisations is their interconnectedness. Relationships between companies are usually analysed on the basis of social network relationships between them. The research question this article aims to answer concerns the influence of being part of an interorganisational network on the occurrence and consequences of unethical behaviour.
This paper covers three main areas of research regarding this topic. Firstly, the role networks play in the initiation, evolution, and consequences of wrongdoings. The main problem taken into consideration in this part of the article is identifying network factors which increase and mitigate the propensity of organisations to deceive their partners. Two main types of such determinants include relational and structural factors. The first group usually involves features such as the strength of ties, the symmetry/asymmetry of ties, and the status of partners. The latter includes such variables as structural holes, centrality, density and the cohesiveness of the network. The second area covered in this article concerns how misconduct behaviours spread throughout the network of interorganisational ties. This phenomenon might resemble a social or emotional contagion occurring in social networks. The effects of unethical acts on the network are the main interest of the third part of this paper. Usually, the consequences of wrongdoing by one of the interconnected partners include a change in the quality of the related partners, modifications in the structure of the network, and an alteration of its prominence and cohesion. In conclusion, there are some suggestions for lines of inquiry in the area of unethical behaviour from the social network perspective in the future.
References
Adler P.S., S. Kwon, Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept, “The Academy of Management Review” 2002, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 17–40, http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2002.5922314.
Google Scholar
Alexander C.R., On the Nature of the Reputational Penalty for Corporate Crime: Evidence, “The Journal of Law & Economics” 1999, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 489–526, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467433.
Google Scholar
Ashforth B.E, V. Anand, The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations, “Research in Organizational Behavior” 2003, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 1–52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2.
Google Scholar
Ashforth B.E., D.A. Gioia, S.L. Robinson, L.K. Treviño, Re-Viewing Organizational Corruption, “Academy of Management Review” 2008, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 670–684, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20159430.
Google Scholar
Ashkanasy N.M., C.A. Windsor, L.K. Treviño, Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making, “Business Ethics Quarterly” 2006, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 449–473, http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200616447.
Google Scholar
Brass D.J., K.D. Butterfield, B.C. Skaggs, Relationships and Unethical Behavior – A Social Network Perspective, “Academy of Management Review” 1998, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 14–31, http://doi.org/10.2307/259097.
Google Scholar
Briscoe F., S. Safford, The Nixon-In-China Effect: Activism, Imitation, and the Institutionalization of Contentious Practices, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2008, Vol. 53, pp. 460–491, http://dx.doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.3.460.
Google Scholar
Burt R.S., Structural Holes, Harvard University Press, Harvard 1995.
Google Scholar
Collins J.D., K. Uhlenbruck, P. Rodriguez, Why Firms Engage in Corruption: A Top Management Perspective, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2009, Vol. 87, No. 1, p. 89–108, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9872-3.
Google Scholar
Coyle-Shapiro J.A.M., Shore L.M., The employee–organization relationship: Where do we go from here?, “Human Resource Management Review” 2007, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 166–179.
Google Scholar
Davis G.F., H.R. Greve, Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s, “American Journal of Sociology” 1997, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 1–37, http://doi.org/10.1086/231170.
Google Scholar
Drover W., M.S. Wood, Y. Fassin, Take the Money or Run? Investors’ Ethical Reputation and Entrepreneurs’ Willingness to Partner, “Journal of Business Venturing” 2014, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 723–740, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.08.004.
Google Scholar
Goffman E., Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Simon and Schuster, New York 1963.
Google Scholar
Granovetter M., Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, “American Journal of Sociology” 1985, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 481–510, http://doi.org/10.1086/228311.
Google Scholar
Granovetter M., The Strength of Weak Ties, “American Journal of Sociology” 1973, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 1360–1380, http://doi.org/10.1086/225469.
Google Scholar
Greve H.R., D. Palmer, J. Pozner, Organizations Gone Wild: The Causes, Processes, and Consequences of Organizational Misconduct, “The Academy of Management Annals” 2010, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 53–107, http://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003654186.
Google Scholar
Gulati R., M. Sytch, Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Interorganizational Relationships: Effects of Embeddedness on a Manufacturer’s Performance in Procurement Relationships, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2007, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 32–69, http://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.32.
Google Scholar
Harris J., P. Bromiley, Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation, “Organization Science” 2007, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 350–367, http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0241.
Google Scholar
Haunschild P.R., A.S. Miner, Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 1997, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 472–500, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393735
Google Scholar
Jensen M., Should We Stay or Should We Go? Status Accountability Anxiety and Client Defections, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2006, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 97–128, http://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.1.97.
Google Scholar
Jonsson S., H.R. Greve, T. Fujiwara-Greve, Undeserved Loss: The Spread of Legitimacy Loss to Innocent Organizations in Response to Reported Corporate Deviance, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2009, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 195–228, http://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.195.
Google Scholar
Karpoff J.M., D.S. Lee, V.P. Vendrzyk, Defense Procurement Fraud, Penalties, and Contractor Influence, “The Journal of Political Economy” 1999, Vol. 107, pp. 809–842, http://doi.org/10.3386/w19846.
Google Scholar
Kulik B.W., Agency Theory, Reasoning And Culture at Enron: In Search of a Solution, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2005, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 347–360, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-7308-2.
Google Scholar
McPherson M., L. Smith-Lovin, J.M. Cook, Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks, “Annual Review of Sociology” 2001, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 415–444, http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
Google Scholar
Melé D., The Practice of Networking: An Ethical Approach, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2009, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp. 487–503, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0602-2.
Google Scholar
Moore D.A., P.E. Tetlock, L. Tanlu, M.H. Bazerman, Conflicts of Interest and the Case of Auditor Independence: Moral Seduction and Strategic Issue Cycling, “Academy of Management Review” 2006, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 10–29, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.19379621.
Google Scholar
Palmer D., C. Moore, Social Networks and Organizational Wrongdoing in Context [in:] Organizational Wrongdoing, eds. D. Palmer, R. Greenwood, K. Smoth-Crowe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2016, pp. 153–170.
Google Scholar
Pinto, J. C.R. Leana, F.K. Pil, Corrupt or Organizations of Corrupt Individuals? Two Types of Organization-Level Corruption, “Academy of Management Review” 2008, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 685–709, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.32465726.
Google Scholar
Provan K.G., A. Fish, J. Sydow, Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks, “Journal of Management” 2007, Vol. 33, No. 3, p. 479–516, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302554.
Google Scholar
Provan K.G., J.G. Sebastian, Networks Within Networks: Service Link Overlap, Organizational Cliques, and Network Effectiveness, “Academy of Management Journal” 1998, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 453–463, http://doi.org/10.2307/257084.
Google Scholar
Rhee M., P.R. Haunschild, The Liability of Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. Automobile Industry, “Organization Science” 2006, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 101–117, http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0175.
Google Scholar
Rogers E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York 1995.
Google Scholar
Rowley T.J., H.R. Greve, H. Rao, J.A. Baum, A.V. Shipilov, Time to Break Up: Social and Instrumental Antecedents of Firm Exits from Exchange Cliques, “The Academy of Management Journal” 2005, Vol. 48, No. 3, p. 499–520, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407914.
Google Scholar
Seevers M.T., S.J. Skinner, S.W. Kelley, A Social Network Perspective on Sales Force Ethics, “Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Force Management” 2008, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 231–251, http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134270405.
Google Scholar
Suchman M.C., Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, “Academy of Management Review” 1995, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 571–610, http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331.
Google Scholar
Sullivan B.N., P. Haunschild, K. Page, Organizations Non Gratae? The Impact of Unethical Corporate Acts on Interorganisational Networks, “Organization Science” 2007, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 55–70, http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0229.
Google Scholar
Sykes G.M., D. Matza, Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency, “American Sociological Review” 1957, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 664–670, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2089195.
Google Scholar
Tenbrunsel A.E., K. Smith‐Crowe, Ethical Decision Making: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going, “The Academy of Management Annals” 2008, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 545–607, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211677.
Google Scholar
Uzzi B., Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 1997, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 35–66, http://doi.org/10.2307/2393808.
Google Scholar
Westphal J., P. Khanna, Keeping Directors in Line: Social Distancing as a Control Mechanism in the Corporate Elite, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2003, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 361–398, http://doi.org/10.2307/3556678.
Google Scholar
Wiesenfeld B.M., K.A. Wurthmann, D.C. Hambrick, The Stigmatization and Devaluation of Elites Associated with Corporate Failures: A Process Model, “Academy of Management Review” 2008, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 231–251, http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.27752771.
Google Scholar
Zuber F., Spread of Unethical Behavior in Organizations: A Dynamic Social Network Perspective, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2015, Vol. 131, No. 1, pp. 151–172, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2270-0.
Google Scholar
