The Moral and Political Dimension of Economics The Fact-Value Dichotomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.19.4.01Keywords:
economics, political economy, fact-value dichotomyAbstract
Since the neoclassical school, the separation between facts and values, is and ought, positive and normative, has become a concern in conventional economic analyses. Economics should focus on facts, and present general principles, leaving the choice of various technical alternatives to policy makers. This article addresses the following questions: can economics, seen as a positive science, be separated from the political dimension? Is it possible to separate facts from values or are they necessarily intertwined?
After showing how the separation between economics and moral philosophy unfolded throughout the history of economic thought, the article analyses the factvalue dichotomy discussion and concludes that facts and values are necessarily intertwined. Then, the article shows that the premises and theories of conventional economic theories contain hidden values, despite being presented as universal truths on which policies are based, and thus fail to discuss the various perspectives of the problems.
Reviving a tradition commenced by Aristotle, the article concludes by arguing that economics is necessarily moral and political. However, the acknowledgement of the normative nature of economics cannot compromise the pursuit of objectivity.
References
Alvey J., A Short History of Economics as a Moral Science, “Journal of Markets & Morality” 1999, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 53–73.
Google Scholar
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000.
Google Scholar
Aristotle, Politics, ed. B. Jowet, 1885, Online Library of Liberty, http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/579.
Google Scholar
Blaug M., A Metodologia da Economia, Gradiva, Lisboa 1980.
Google Scholar
Boulding K.E., Economics as a Moral Science, “American Economic Review” 1969, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 1–12.
Google Scholar
Brandis R., Value Judgments and Economics Science, “The Quarterly Review of Economics and Business” 1963, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 41–50.
Google Scholar
Caldas C., Beyond the Fact Value Split: Political Economy, communication presented at the conference ‘The Revival of Political Economy: prospects for sustainable provision,’ Universidade de Coimbra, October 23, 2010.
Google Scholar
Caldas C., V. Neves, The meaning of objectivity. What can we learn from Robbins and Myrdal [in:] Values and Objectivity in Economics, eds. J. Caldas, V. Neves, Routledge, London 2012, pp. 47–63.
Google Scholar
Coats A.W., Half a century of methodological controversy in economics: as reflected by the writings of T.W. Hutchinson [in:] Methodological Controversy in Economics: His torical Essays in Honor of T.W. Hutchison, ed. A.W. Coats, JAI Press, Greenwich 1983, pp 1–42.
Google Scholar
Crespo R., On Aristotle and Economics, “Working Paper Series IAE” 2008, https://www.iae.edu.ar/pi/Documentos%20Investigacin/Working%20Papers/DTIAE08_2008.pdf.
Google Scholar
Friedman M., The Methodology of Economics [in:] The Philosophy of Economics, ed. D. Hausman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008, pp. 145–178.
Google Scholar
Gutenschwager G., Is Economics a Value Free Science?, World Economic Association, Conferences 2012, Economics and Society. The Ethical Dimension, https://weaethicsconference.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/gutenschwager_is-economics-a-value-free-science.pdf.
Google Scholar
Heilbroner R., Economics as a Value Free Science, “Social Research” 1973, No. 40, pp. 129–143.
Google Scholar
Hume D., Treatise of Human Nature, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1888, http://michaeljohnson philosophy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/5010_Hume_Treatise_Human_Nature.pdf.
Google Scholar
Hutchinson T.H, Positive Economics and Policy Objectives, Allen & Unwin, London 1964.
Google Scholar
Jevons W.S., The Theory of Political Economy, ed. Macmillan and Company, London 1888, Library of Economics and Liberty, http://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/Jevons/jvnPE.html.
Google Scholar
Keynes J.N. The Scope and the Method of Political Economy, Batoche Books, Kitchener 1990.
Google Scholar
Louçã F., C. Caldas, Economia(s), Afrontamento, Porto 2010.
Google Scholar
Malthus T., Definitions in Political Economy, ed. J. Murray, 1827, Online Library of Liberty, http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2255.
Google Scholar
Marshall A., Principles of Economics, Macmillan, London 1961.
Google Scholar
Marshall A., The Correspondence of Alfred Marshall [in:] Memorials of Alfred Marshall, ed. A.C. Pigou, Macmillan, London 1925, pp. 452–480.
Google Scholar
Mill J.S., On the Definition and Method of Political Economy [in:] The Philosophy of Economics, ed. D. Hausman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008, pp. 41–58.
Google Scholar
Myrdal G., Objectivity in Social Research, Pantheon Books, London 1969.
Google Scholar
Myrdal G., Implicit Values in Economics [in:] The Philosophy of Economics, ed. D. Hausman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984, pp. 250–259.
Google Scholar
Nagel T., The view from nowhere, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford 1989.
Google Scholar
Nunes A., Noção e objeto de Economia Política, Almedina, Coimbra 2013.
Google Scholar
Putnam H., The Collapse of Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA 2002.
Google Scholar
Ricardo D., Princípios de Economia Política e Tributação, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisboa 1983.
Google Scholar
Ricardo D., The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, ed. P. Sraffa with the collaboration of M.H. Dobb, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1951–1973.
Google Scholar
Robbins L., An Essay of Nature and Significance of Economic Science, Macmillan and Co., London 1945.
Google Scholar
Santos A., The facts and values of experimental economics [in:] Facts, Values and Objectivity in Economics, eds. J. Caldas, V. Neves, Routledge, London 2012, pp. 88–109.
Google Scholar
Sen A., On Ethics and Economics, Blackwell Publishing, Malden 1988.
Google Scholar
Senior N., An Outline of the Science of Political Economy, Augustus Kelley, London 1965.
Google Scholar
Smith A., Teoria dos Sentimentos Morais, Martins Fontes, São Paulo 2012.
Google Scholar
Smith A., A Riqueza das Nações, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisboa 2001.
Google Scholar
Weber M., Objectivity and Understanding in Economics [in:] The Philosophy of Economics, ed. D. Hausman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002, pp. 59–72.
Google Scholar
Wilber C., R. Hoksbergen, Ethical Values and Economics Theory: A Survey [in:] Economics, Ethics and Public Policy, ed. C. Wilber, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Maryland 1998, pp.17–32.
Google Scholar
