The early stages in the evolution of Economic Man. Millian and marginal approaches

Autor

  • Joanna Dzionek-Kozłowska University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of the History of Economic Thought and Economic History

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.6.03

Słowa kluczowe:

homo economicus, Economic Man, rationality, marginal economics, John Stuart Mill, Alfred Marshall

Abstrakt

The homo economicus (Economic Man) concept is one of the best-known components of economic theorising frequently recognised as a part of the “hard core” of the mainstream 20th-century economics. This model gained such a high status in times of the marginal revolution, although it was coined in the 1830s by the classical economist John S. Mill. Nowadays, homo economicus is commonly perceived as a model of rational economic agent maximising utility or preferences. The article aims to show that both the Millian approach and the marginal approach were more complex than the contemporary incarnation of Economic Man. One of the key differences between the early stages in the evolution of homo oeconomicus and the modern version of it refers to the notion of rationality. Whereas it is the constitutive element of the 20th-century homo oeconomicus, the requirement of full rationality was never explicitly articulated by Mill and marginal economists. Therefore, at the early stages of its evolution, the homo economicus model would have been much more resistant to the objections formulated against it by the 20th-century critics.

Bibliografia

Alter, M. (1982). Carl Menger and Homo Oeconomicus: some thoughts on Austrian theory and methodology. Journal of Economic Issues, 16(1), 149–160.
Google Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Dzionek-Kozłowska, J. (2007). System ekonomiczno-społeczny Alfreda Marshalla [Socioeconomic system of Alfred Marshall]. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers.
Google Scholar

Dzionek-Kozłowska, J., & Matera, R. (2015). Ethics in economic thought. Selected issues and various perspectives. Łódź-Kraków: Lodz University Press & Jagiellonian University Press.
Google Scholar

Fontaine, Ph. (1998). Menger, Jevons, and Walras un-homogenized, de-homogenized, and homogenized: A comment on Peart. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 57(3), 333–339.
Google Scholar

Giegerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals. How people cope with uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Giocoli, N. (2005). Modeling rational agents: The consistency view of rationality and the changing image of neoclassical economics. Cahiers d’Économie Politique, 49(2), 177–208.
Google Scholar

Godłów-Legiędź, J. (1992). Doktryna społeczno-ekonomiczna Friedricha von Hayeka. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers.
Google Scholar

Hausman, D. (2013). Philosophy of Economics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2013 Edition. https://plato.stan-ford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/economics/
Google Scholar

von Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.
Google Scholar

von Hayek, F. A. (1988). The fatal conceit. The errors of socialism. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Hébert, R. F. (1998). Jevons and Menger re-homogenized: Who is the real “Odd Man Out?” A comment on Peart. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 57(3), 327–332.
Google Scholar

Jaffé, W. (1976). Menger, Jevons and Walras de-homogenized. Economic Inquiry, 14, 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00439.x
Google Scholar

Jevons, W. S. (1866/1965). Brief account of a general mathematical theory of Political Economy. In The theory of Political Economy, 303–314. New York: Augustus M. Kelley [originally published in Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 29].
Google Scholar

Jevons, W. S. (1874). Principles of science: A treatise on logic and scientific method. New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Jevons, W. S. (1965). The theory of Political Economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.
Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Google Scholar

Knight, F. H. (1921/1964). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
Google Scholar

Kostro, K. (2001). Hayek kontra socjalizm. Debata socjalistyczna a rozwój teorii społeczno-ekonomicznych Friedricha Augusta von Hayeka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo DiG.
Google Scholar

Lazear, E. (2000). Economic Imperialism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1), 99–146.
Google Scholar

Mäki, U. (2004). Theoretical isolation and explanatory progress: Transaction cost economics and the dynamics of dispute. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(3), 319–346.
Google Scholar

Marshall, A. (1879/1930). The pure theory of domestic values. London: London School of Economics and Political Sciences.
Google Scholar

Marshall, A. (1896/1897). The old generation of economists and the new. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 11, 115–135.
Google Scholar

Marshall, A. (1907). The social possibilities of economic chivalry. Economic Journal, 17, 7–29.
Google Scholar

Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan. Library of Economics and Liberty. http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marP.html
Google Scholar

Marshall, A. (1925). The present position of Political Economy. In A. C. Pigou (Ed.), Memorials of Alfred Marshall. London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Marshall, A. (1996). Letter to J.N. Keynes, 17.IX.1898. In J. K. Whitaker (Ed.), The Correspondence of Alfred Marshall, Economist (Vol. 1). Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Menger, C. (1985). Investigations into the method of social sciences with special reference to Economics. New York, London: New York University Press.
Google Scholar

Menger, C. (2007). Principles of economics. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1836/1967). On the definition of Political Economy; and on the method of investigation proper to it. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), Collected works of John Stuart Mill (Vol. 4, pp. 309–339). London: University of Toronto Press, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1844/1974). A system of logic ratiocinative and inductive. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), Collected works of John Stuart Mill (Vol. 7–8). London: University of Toronto Press, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1873/1981). Authobiography. In J. M. Robson & J. Stillinger (Eds.), Collected works of John Stuart Mill (Vol. 1). London: University of Toronto Press, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1965). Principles of Political Economy with some of their applications to social philosophy. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), Collected works of John Stuart Mill (Vol. 3). London: University of Toronto Press, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar

Morgan, M. S. (2006). Economic Man as model man: Ideal types, idealization and caricatures. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28(1), 1–27.
Google Scholar

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Peart, S. J. (1998). Jevons and Menger re-homogenized?: Jaffé after 20 years. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 57(3), 307–325.
Google Scholar

Senior, N. W. (1836/1965). An outline of the science of political economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.
Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138.
Google Scholar

Szarzec, K. (2005). Racjonalny podmiot gospodarczy w klasycznej myśli ekonomicznej i jej współczesnych kontynuacjach. Warszawa: Fundacja Promocji i Akredytacji Kierunków Ekonomicznych, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne.
Google Scholar

Szarzec, K. (2006). J.S. Milla model homo oeconomicus. Przegląd Filozoficzny, 60(4), 241–256.
Google Scholar

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Veblen, T. B. (1900/1919). The preconceptions of economic science: III. In The place of science in modern society and other essays (pp. 170–179). New York: B.W. Huebsch [originally published in Quarterly Journal of Economics, 14, 240–269].
Google Scholar

Walras, L. (2014). Elements of theoretical economics or the theory of social wealth, 3rd Edition, (D. A. Walker & J. van Daal, Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2019-02-22

Jak cytować

Dzionek-Kozłowska, J. (2019). The early stages in the evolution of Economic Man. Millian and marginal approaches. Annales. Etyka W Życiu Gospodarczym, 20(6), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.6.03

Numer

Dział

Artykuł