Jurysprudencyjne pokrewieństwo? Koncepcja praworządności i koncepcja państwa prawnego jako dwie konkurencyjne drogi kształtowania społeczeństwa, sfery publicznej i ich ram normatywnych

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.114.02

Słowa kluczowe:

praworządność, państwo prawa – (Rechtsstaat), średniowieczny konstytucjonalizm, sfera publiczna, Trybunał Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej (TSUE), rozporządzenie TSUE (UE, Euratom) 202/2092

Abstrakt

W niniejszym artykule odnosimy się do artykułu profesora Martina Loughlina pt. “The Rule of Law: A Slogan in Search of a Concept” (2024). Biorąc powyższe pod uwagę, (1) przedstawiamy trzy tezy badawcze, aby je uzasadnić, (2) krótko przedstawiamy i omawiamy argumenty dotyczące pojawienia się koncepcji praworządności w XII-wiecznym angielskim prawie zwyczajowym, sformułowane przez amerykańskiego historyka konstytucji Charlesa Howarda McIlwaina. (3) Ponieważ teza McIlwaina dotycząca średniowiecznego rozróżnienia między jurisdictio i gubernaculum została omówiona w pracach Gianluigiego Palombelli, przedstawiamy również kluczowe elementy i punkty argumentacji Palombelli dotyczące praworządności (RoL) w odróżnieniu od koncepcji państwa prawnego – Rechtsstaat. (4) Biorąc pod uwagę ukształtowane historycznie cechy charakterystyczne składające się na koncepcję praworządności, analizujemy proces, w ra­mach którego została ona wdrożona przez Trybunał Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej (TSUE), a następnie skupiamy się na prawnej definicji „praworządności” zawartej w rozporządzeniu Parlamentu Europejskiego (UE, Euratom) nr 202/2092 z dnia 16 grudnia 2020 r. (5) Na zakończenie analizy wskazujemy pokrótce czynniki, które wymagają aktualnej analizy, aby uzyskać kompleksową charakterystykę porównawczą pojęć praworządności (RoL) i państwo prawa Rechtsstaat (faza normatywno-opisowa) oraz ułatwić rekonstrukcję rozbieżności w ich ujmowaniu.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Bibliografia

Alexy, Robert. 1989. A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Clarendon.

Alexy, Robert. 2020. A Non-positivistic Concept of Constitutional Rights. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 33: 35–46.

Bogdandy, Armin von. Piotr Bogdanowicz. Iris Canor. Christoph Grabenwarter. Maciej Taborowski. Matthias Schmidt. Eds. 2021. “Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States: Taking Stock of Europe’s Actions.” Springer Nature. 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62317-6_15

Bogdanowicz, Piotr. Matthias Schmidt. 2021. “The infringement procedure in the rule of law crisis: how to make effective use of Article 258 TFEU.” Common Market Law Review 55: 1061–1100. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2018093

Bonelli, Matteo. Monica Claes. 2018. “Judicial serendipity: how Portuguese judges came to the rescue of the Polish judiciary.” EuConst 14: 622–643. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019618000330

Bracton, Henry de. 1922. De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae. Edited by George E. Woodbine. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Burgess, Paul. 2017. “Neglecting the History of the Rule of Law. (Unintended) Conceptual Eugenics.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 2(9): 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-017-0057-y

Butler, Graham. 2020. “Independence of non-judicial bodies and orders for a preliminary reference to the Court of Justice.” European Law Review 45(6): 870–887. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IFCA4CD70358A11EBB048811CC5845CC6/View/FullText.html https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12434

Caenegem, R.C. Van. 1988. The Birth of the English Common Law. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clanchy, Michael T. 1998. England and its Rulers, 1066–1272. 2nd edn. with an epilogue on Edward I (1272–1307). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Davies, Gareth. 2014. “Legislative Control of the European Court of Justice.” Common Market Law Review 51(6): 1579–1607.

Dicey, Albert Venn. 1915. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics edition (reprint). https://files.libertyfund.org/files/1714/0125_Bk.pdf

Dybowski, Maciej. 2021. “Chapter 21: Remarks on the Pragmatic Role of Legal Definitions in the Derivational Theory of Legal Interpretation.” In Poznań School of Legal Theory, edited by Paweł Kwiatkowski and Maciej Smolak, 350–364. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004448445_22

Eeckhout, Piet. 2002. “The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Federal Question.” Common Market Law Review 39(5): 940–994. https://www.biicl.org/files/3273_eeckhout.pdf https://doi.org/10.54648/5102448

Elsuwege, Peter Van, and Femke Grimmelprez. 2020. “Protecting the Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order: A Constitutional Role for the Court of Justice.” European Constitutional Law Review 16(1): 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000085

Habermas, Jürgen. 1999. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Halmai, Gábor. 2019. “The Possibility and Desirability of Rule of Law Conditionality.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11(1): 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0077-2

Haskins, George Lee. 1955. “Executive Justice and the Rule of Law: Some Reflections on Thirteenth-Century England.” Speculum 30(4): 529–538. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2849610

Janusz-Pohl, Barbara. 2017. Definitions and Typologies of Legal Acts in Criminal Proceedings: Perspective of Conventionalisation and Formalisation. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

Juchacz, Piotr W. 2020. “Deliberative Law-Making: A Case Study of the Process of Enacting a ‘Constitution of the Third Sector’ in the Polish Sejm.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 33: 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09664-x

Kadlec, Ondrej, and David Kosar. 2022. “Romanian Version of the Rule of Law Crisis Comes to the ECJ: The AFJR Case Is Not Just About the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism.” Common Market Law Review 59(6): 1823–1852. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2022120

Kant, Immanuel. 2008. “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.” In Immanuel Kant – Practical Philosophy. Edited by Mary J. Gregor. 12th printing: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kirst, Niels. 2021. “Rule of Law and Conditionality: The Long Awaited Step Towards Solution of the Rule of Law Crisis in European Union.” European Papers 1(1): 101–110.

Kochenov, Dimitry. 2015. “Biting Intergovernmentalism: The Case for the Reinvention of Article 259 TFEU to Make It a Viable Rule of Law Enforcement Tool.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 7: 153–174.

Kochenov, Dimitry, and Petra Bárd. 2019. “The Last Soldier Standing? Courts vs. Politicians and the Rule of Law Crisis in the New Member States of the EU.” European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 1: 243–288.

Kochenov, Dimitry, and Aleksejs Dimitrovs. 2021. “Solving the Copenhagen Dilemma: The Repubblika Decision of the European Court of Justice.” Verfassungsblog, 28 April.

Kochenov, Dimitry, and Laurent Pech. 2021. “Respect for the Rule of Law in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice: A Casebook Overview of Key Judgments since the Portuguese Judges Case.” SIEPS. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies 3.

Kordela, Marzena. 2008. “The principle of legal certainty as a fundamental element of the formal concept of the Rule of Law.” Revue du Notariat 110(2): 589–607.

Kozak, Artur. 2002. Granice prawniczej władzy dyskrecjonalnej. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Kolonia Limited.

Langbein, John H., René Lettow Lerner, and Bruce Philip Smith. 2009. History of the Common Law. The Development of Anglo-American Legal Institutions. Austin: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.

Lautenbach, Geranne. 2013. The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671199.001.0001

Lazowski, Adam. 2013. “Decoding a Legal Enigma: The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Infringement Proceedings.” ERA Forum 14: 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-013-0331-y

Lorenz Arold, Nina-Louisa. 2014. “No Court is an Island: Philosophy at the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice.” In Towards Recognition of Minority Groups. Legal and Communication Strategies. Edited by Marek Zirk-Sadowski, Bartosz Wojciechowski, Karolina M. Cern. 129–146. Farnham: Routledge.

Loughlin, Martin. 2010. Foundations of Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256853.001.0001

Loughlin, Martin. 2021. “Michael Oakeshott’s Republican Theory of the Rule of Law.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law. Edited by Jens Meierhenrich and Martin Loughlin. 171–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108600569.010

Loughlin, Martin. 2024. “The Rule of Law: A Slogan in Search of a Concept.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 16: 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-024-00224-5

Łazowski, Adam. 2022. “Strengthening the rule of law and the EU pre-accession policy: Repubblika v. Il-Prim Ministru.” Common Market Law Review 59(6): 1803–1822. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2022119

Łętowska, Ewa. 2005. “Multicentryczność współczesnego systemu prawa i jej konsekwencje.” Państwo i Prawo 4: 3–10.

Mader, Oliver. 2019. “Enforcement of EU Values as a Political Endeavor: Constitutional Pluralism and Value Homogeneity in Times of Persistent Challenges to the Rule of Law.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11: 133–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-00083-x

May, Christopher, and Adam Winchester. Eds. 2018. Handbook on the Rule of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

McIlwain, Charles Howard. 2008. Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern. Indianapolis: Amagi, Liberty Fund.

Meierhenrich, Jens. 2021. “Rechtsstaat versus Rule of Law.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law. Edited by Jens Meierhenrich and Martin Loughlin. 39–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108600569.003

Meierhenrich, Jens, and Martin Loughlin. Eds. 2021. The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108600569

Moreiro González, Carlos J. 2024. “Implementing the Rule of Law in the European Union: How Long Trapped in Penelope’s Spinning Wheel from Article 2 of the TEU?” Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 25: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2023.17

Nowak, Leszek. 1987. “A Concept of Rational Legislator.” In Polish Contributions to the Theory and Philosophy of Law. Edited by Zygmunt Ziembiński. 137–146. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Palombella, Gianluigi. 2009. “The Rule of Law and its Core.” In Relocating the Rule of Law. Edited by Gianluigi Palombella and Neil Walker. 1–23. Oxford: Hart Publishers.

Palombella, Gianluigi. 2009. “The rule of law beyond the state: Failures, promises, and theory.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 3(7): 442–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mop012

Pech, Laurent. 2021. “Polish ruling party’s ‘fake judges’ before the European Court of Justice: Some comments on (decided) Case C-824/18 AB and (pending) Case C-132/20 Getin Noble Bank.” EU Law Analysis, 7 March.

Pech, Laurent. 2022. “The Rule of Law as a Well-Established and Well-Defined Principle of EU Law.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 14: 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00176-8

Pech, Laurent, and Dimitry Kochenov. 2016. “Better late than never: On the European Commission’s Rule of Law Framework and its first activation.” Journal of Common Market Studies 54: 1062–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12401

Polak, Polly Ruth. 2023. “The evolving narrative of the court on the rule of law in the EU and potential future directions.” Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 77: 171–208. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rdce.77.05

Polakiewicz, Jörg, and Julia Katharina Kirchmayr. 2021. “Sounding the Alarm: The Council of Europe As the Guardian of the Rule of Law in Contemporary Europe.” In Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States: Taking Stock of Europe’s Actions. Edited by Armin von Bogdandy, Piotr Bogdanowicz, Iris Canor, Christoph Grabenwarter, Maciej Taborowski, Matthias Schmidt. 361–382. Heidelberg: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62317-6_14

Pollock, Sir Frederick, and Frederic William Maitland. 1968. The History of English Law. Before the Time of Edward I. Second Edition reissued with a new introduction and select bibliography Milsom SFC. Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Raz, Joseph. 1979. “The rule of law and its virtue.” In The authority of law: Essays on law and morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001

Rizcallah, Cecillia, and Victor Davio. 2020. “L’article 19 du Traité sur l’Union européenne: sesame de l’Union de droit – Analyse de la jurisprudence récente de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne relative à l’indépendance des juges nationaux.” Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme 122(2): 155–185. https://doi.org/10.3917/rtdh.122.0155

Sajó, András. 2019. “The Rule of Law as Legal Despotism. Concerned Remarks on the Use of ‘Rule of Law’ in Illiberal Democracies.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11: 371–376.

Scalia, Antonin. 2002. “American and English Common Law Systems: Similarities and Differences.” In The English Legal System in the Twenty-First Century. The Inner Temple Millennium Lectures with an Introduction by Stanley Brodie QC. 73–86. London: The Honourable Society of The Inner Temple.

Scheppele, Kim Lane, Dimitry Kochenov, and Barbara Grabowska-Moroz. 2020. ”EU Values Are Law, after All: Enforcing EU Values through Systemic Infringement Actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union.” Yearbook of European Law 39: 3–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yeaa012

Schmidt, Matthias, and Piotr Bogdanowicz. 2021. “Ascertaining the ‘Guarantee of Guarantees’: Recent Developments Regarding the Infringement Procedure in the EU’s Rule of Law Crisis.” In Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States: Taking Stock of Europe’s Actions. Edited by Armin von Bogdandy, Piotr Bogdanowicz, Iris Canor, Christoph Grabenwarter, Maciej Taborowski, Matthias Schmidt. 207–236. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62317-6

Smith, Melanie. 2019. “Staring into the abyss: A crisis of the rule of law in the EU.” European Law Journal 25: 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12345

Spieker, Luke Dimitrios. 2023. EU Values Before the Court of Justice. Foundations, Potential, Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198876717.001.0001

Tiedemann, Paul. 2014. “The Rechtsstaat-Principle in Germany: The Development from the Beginning Until Now.” In The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat). Edited by James R. Silkenat, James E. Jr. Hickey, Peter D. Barenboim. 171–192. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05585-5_12

Tubbs, James W. 2000. The Common Law Mind. Medieval and Early Modern Conceptions. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Varga, Csaba. 1973. “Quelques questions méthodologiques de la formation des concepts en sciences juridiques.” Archives de Philosophie du Droit 18: 189–205.

Varga, Csaba. 2021. “Rule of Law – Contesting and Contested.” Central European Journal of Comparative Law 1(2): 245–278. https://doi.org/10.47078/2021.1.245-278

Varga, Csaba. 2022. “Rechtsstaat, Rule of Law – Expectations, criticisms, and the nature of claims.” In Rule of Law. Edited by Grzegorz Pastuszko. 13–58. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości.

Veraldi, Jacquelyn. 2023. “Private Power, the Rule of Law and the European Union.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 15: 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-023-00200-5

Wronkowska, Sławomira. 1987. “The Rational Legislator as a Model for the Real Lawmaker.” In Polish Contributions to the Theory and Philosophy of Law. Edited by Zygmunt Ziembiński. 147–164. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Zwierzykowski, Michał. 2006. “Etapy ewolucji sejmikowej administracji i sądownictwa skarbowego XVI–XVIII wieku. Od partykularnych instytucji do samorządu terytorialnego doby Stanisławowskiej.” In Podstawy materialne państwa. Zagadnienia prawno-historyczne. Edited by Daniel Bogacz and Marek Tkaczuk. 63–71. Szczecin: Uniwersytet Szczeciński.

OPINION OF THE REPRESENTATIVE GENERAL MANUEL CAMPOS SÁNCHEZ-BORDONA submitted on December 2, 2021. 1 Case C-157/21 Republic of Poland v. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:62021CC0157

Advocate General Manuel Campos Sánchez-Bordona: Hungary’s and Poland’s complaints against the system of conditionality introduced to protect the Union’s budget in case of violations of the rule of law should be dismissed. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62021CC0156

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 26 X 2012, OJ C 326/02.

TFEU – OJ 2004.90.864/2 – Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – consolidated text taking into account the amendments introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon.

TEU – Treaty on the European Union (OJ. 2004, no. 90, item 864/830 as amended; C 202/13 access, https://europa.eu/european-union/sites/default/files/docs/body/treaty_on_european_union_en.pdf)

Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on the general system of conditionality for the protection of the Union’s budget. Official Journal of the EU 2020 L 433 I/1.

Regulation No. 1 defining the language regime of the European Economic Community (OJ 17, 6.10.1958, p. 385). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:01958R0001-20130701

Opublikowane

2026-09-09

Jak cytować

Cern, Karolina M., and Barbara Janusz-Pohl. 2026. “Jurysprudencyjne pokrewieństwo? Koncepcja praworządności I Koncepcja państwa Prawnego Jako Dwie Konkurencyjne Drogi kształtowania społeczeństwa, Sfery Publicznej I Ich Ram Normatywnych”. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 114 (September): 5-37. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.114.02.

Funding data