In Search of Originality in Central and Eastern European Legal Culture Culture(s). 4th Annual CEENELS Conference: Legal Innovativeness in Central and Eastern Europe, Moscow, 14–15 June 2019

Piotr Szymaniec

doi:10.18778/0208-6069.96.11

Autor

Piotr Szymaniec Angelus Silesius University of Applied Sciences in Wałbrzych https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5415-9215

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.96.11

Słowa kluczowe:

kultura prawna, Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia, Central and Eastern European Network of Legal Scholars

Abstrakt

Artykuł opisuje dyskusje, które miały miejsce podczas IV Konferencji CEENELS (Moskwa, 14–15 czerwca 2019). Celem konferencji była analiza zagadnienia innowacyjności w zakresie prawa w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej. Temat ten został wybrany jako kontynuacja poprzednich konferencji CEENELS. Organizatorzy chcieli podważyć powszechne przekonanie, że w kulturze prawnej Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej brakuje oryginalnych oraz nowatorskich koncepcji i pomysłów. Nawet jeśli konferencja nie przyniosła definitywnej odpowiedzi na temat charakteru kultury prawnej krajów Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, to pokazała, że region ten jest nie tylko terytorium przeszczepów prawnych i recepcji idei, koncepcji i instytucji prawnych, tworzonych w Europie Zachodniej lub USA.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Bibliografia

Barak, Aaron. 2012. Proportionality. Constitutional Rights and their Limitations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035293

CEENELS. 2016. “About CEENELS.” CEENELS, July 16, 2016. http://ceenels.org/info/about-ceenels/ [Accessed: 6 December 2019].

Giaro, Tomasz. 2011. “Legal tradition of Eastern Europe. Its rise and demise.” Comparative Law Review 2(1): 1–23.

Glossary. 2001. “Glossary of statistical terms. Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs).” OECD, September 25, 2001. https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=303 [Accessed: 6 December 2019].

Hendley, Katharine. 2018. “Mapping the career preferences of Russian law graduates.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 25(3): 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2018.1481850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2018.1481850

Kischel, Uwe. 2019. Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791355.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791355.001.0001

Kühn, Zdeněk. 2011. The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe. Mechanical Jurisprudence in Transformation? Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047429005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047429005

Mańko, Rafał. 2020a. “Being Central European, or some reflections on law, double peripherality and the political in times of transformation.” In Central and Eastern Europe as a Double Periphery? 17–46. Edited by Tomáš Gábriš, Ján Sombati. Berlin: Peter Lang.

Mańko, Rafał. 2020b. “Artur Kozak’s Juriscentrist Concept of Law: a Central European Innovation in Legal Theory.” Review of Central and East European Law 45(2–3): 334–375. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja04502003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja04502003

Mańko, Rafał. Martin Škop. Marketa Štěpáníková. 2016. “Carving out Central Europe as a space of legal culture: a way out of peripherality?” Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics 6(2): 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0002

Marasinova, Elena. 2019. “The Death Penalty Moratorium in 18th-Century Russia.” Quaestio Rossica 7(4): 1086–1106. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2019.4.426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2019.4.426

Marek, Krystyna. 1954. Identity and Continuity of States in Public International Law. Geneve: Librairies Droz.

Narits, Raul. 2007. “Principles of Law and Legal Dogmatics as Methods Used by Constitutional Courts.” Juridica International 13: 15–22.

Nelken, David. 2004. “Using The Concept of Legal Culture.” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 29: 1–26.

Podgórecki, Adam. 1981. “Unrecognized Father of Sociology of Law: Leon Petrażycki. Reflections based on Jan Górecki’s Sociology and Jurisprudence of Leon Petrażycki.” Law and Society Review 20(1): 183–202. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053227

Podgórecki, Adam. 1991. Sociological Theory of Law. Milano: Giuffrè.

Stambulski, Michał. 2019. “The concept of law in the analytical and post-analytical theory.” In A post-analytical approach to philosophy and theory of law. 57–74. Edited by Andrzej Bator, Zbigniew Pulka. Berlin: Peter Lang.

Stawecki, Tomasz. 2010. “Precedens w polskim porządku prawnym. Pojęcie i wnioski de lege ferenda.” [Precedent in the Polish legal order. The concept and conclusions de lege ferenda]. In Precedens w polskim systemie prawa [Precedent in the Polish legal system]. 59–98. Edited by Anna Śledzińska-Simon, Mirosław Wyrzykowski. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski.

Stelmachowski, Andrzej. 1967. “Prawotwórcza rola sądów (w świetle orzecznictwa cywilnego).” [The law-making role of courts (in the light of civil law)]. Państwo i Prawo 4–5: 611–626.

Szymaniec, Piotr. 2018. “Discussion about the Legal Identity of Central and Eastern Europe. 3rd Annual CEENELS Conference ‘Legal Identities and Legal Traditions in CEE’.” Acta Universitatis Lodzienis. Folia Iuridica 85: 139–153. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.85.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.85.11

Szymaniec, Piotr. Ed. 2015. Zasada proporcjonalności a ochrona praw podstawowych w państwach Europy. [The Principle of Proportionality and the Protection of the Fundamental Rights in the European States]. Wałbrzych: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane PWSZ im. Angelusa Silesiusa w Wałbrzychu.

Totyev, Konstantin. 2016. “Business transaction invalidity in the context of the principle of legality.” Russian Law Journal 4(4): 81–94. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2016-4-4-81-94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2016-4-4-81-94

Zomerski, Wojciech. 2016. “Conference report: 1st International Conference of the Central European Network of Legal Scholars (CENELS) on ‘25 Years After the Transformation: Law and Legal Culture in Central and Eastern Europe. Between Continuity and Discontinuity,’ Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, 16–17 April 2015.” Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics 4(2): 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2015-0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2015-0017

Zomerski, Wojciech. 2017. “Conference Report: 2nd Annual Conference of the Central and Eastern European Network of Legal Scholars (CEENELS): ‘An Uneasy Legacy: Remnants of Socialist Legal and Political Thinking in Central and Eastern Europe,’ Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Law and Administration, 7–8 January 2017.” Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics 7(2): 83–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0019