Illegitimacy of penalizing incestuous relations and the offspring issue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.85.06Keywords:
incest, taboo, eugenics, the functions of law, coherency of the legal systemAbstract
The paper proposes a thesis that penalization of incestuous relations is illegitimate on the grounds of inconsistency it creates in the legal system. On one hand, the legislator has to be neutral in its worldview and therefore should not create laws based on its own or even shared by some people cultural taboos – and if it were to, it should do it also in other cases, which may lead to penalizing, for example, cases of adultery in marriage. On the other hand – if the base of penalizing incestuous relations is a eugenic one, then in order to maintain coherency of the legal system, relations between people suffering from severe genetic and inherited diseases should also be penalized. After all, they also pose a danger to the gene pool. Thus, it should be stated that penalizing incestuous relationships – at least in the way currently proposed, without adjusting the other legal system is illegitimate.
Downloads
References
Cook, James, James King. 1793. A voyage to the Pacific Ocean… Vol. 3. London: Printed for Champante and Whitrow, Jewry Street, Aldgate, and M. Watson, Hermitage-Bridge. https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=F0M-AAAAYAAJ&hl=pl&printsec=frontcover&pg=GBS.PA1 [dostęp 16.06.2018].
Daniluk, Paweł, Celina Nowak. 2007–2008. „Kazirodztwo jako problem karnoprawny (dwugłos)”. Archiwum Kryminologii 29–30: 473–487.
Justyński, Tomasz. 2003. Poczęcie i urodzenie się dziecka jako źródło odpowiedzialności cywilnej. Kraków: Kantor Wydawniczy Zakamycze.
Mill, John Stewart. 1959. „O wolności”. Tł. Amelia Kurlandzka. W Utylitaryzm. O wolności. Tł. Maria Ossowska, Amelia Kurlandzka. Wstęp Tadeusz Kotarbiński. 92–227. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Morris, Joan K., David E. Mutton, Eva Alberman. 2002. „Revised estimates of the maternal age specific live birth prevalence of Down’s syndrome”. Journal of Medical Screening 9: 2–6.
Musielak, Michał. 2008. Sterylizacja ludzi ze względów eugenicznych w Stanach Zjednoczonych, Niemczech i w Polsce (1899–1945). Wybrane problemy. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.
Nesterowicz, Mirosław. 2011. „Roszczenia z tytułu wrongful conception, wrongful birth, wrongful life”. W Prawo medyczne. Komentarze i glosy do orzeczeń sądowych. 422–459. Warszawa: LexisNexis.
Olshan, Andrew F., Patricia G. Schnitzer, Patricia A. Baird. 1994. „Paternal age and the risk of congenital heart defects”. Teratology 50 (1): 80–84.
Russell, Bertrand. 2009. Human Society in Ethics and Politics. London: Routledge.
The Global Divide on Homosexuality [Ankieta dotycząca stosunku do homoseksualizmu]. 2013. http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2013/06/Pew–Global–Attitudes–Homosexuality–Report–FINAL–JUNE–42013.pdf [dostęp 28.02.2018].
„Victimless Crime”. W Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice. https://www.encyclopedia.com/social–sciences–and–law/law/law/victimless–crime#1–1G2:3403000270–full [dostęp 28.02.2018].
Wróbel, Włodzimierz, Andrzej Zoll. 2014. Polskie prawo karne. Część ogólna. Kraków: Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
