The Law and Question. The Phenomenon of Question as a Possible Point of Departure for the Phenomenologico-Genetic Theory of Law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.90.08

Keywords:

Adolf Reinach, phenomenology of law, question

Abstract

In his original phenomenology of law Adolf Reinach distinguishes among experiences the so-called “social acts”. These include acts directed towards other persons that require that the latter acknowledge the communicated contents and assume certain attitudes. Among these acts Reinach mentions there are promises, orders, requests and questions. He argues the promise is the special act that creates the a priori grounds of law. It is to be noted that Reinach’s phenomenology of law is of static character (in the Husserlian sense of the word) and therefore it shares all its advantages and disadvantages.

In my paper I would like to draw attention to another social act, which can also be attributed to certain law-making activities, especially from the perspective of the genetic phenomenology. It is questioning. At the same time when Reinach was working on his theory of law, his Munich friend, Johannes Daubert (1877–1947), also a student of Theodor Lipps and a friend of Edmund Husserl, who together with Reinach made an “invasion of the Munichs at Göttingen”, worked on the first phenomenology of the question. Although he did not refer his research to the phenomenon of law, we can ask whether, like Reinach’s deliberations about promises and obligation, it cannot be done. That this is possible to some extent, for example, is evinced by the Hannah Arendt and Klaus Held’s phenomenology of the political world. He points out that the public world as such arises from the primordial openness of man, understood as “zoon politikon”. This openness might be interpreted as the question which is not so much a single act as it is an attitude.

The purpose of the paper is to outline how, while starting with the phenomenological reflection over various types of utterances, one can specify their certain forms and the acts constituting them as well as the attitudes which allow for a priori grounding the phenomenon of law from the perspective of static and genetic phenomenology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1988. Human Condition. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Brożek, Anna. 2007. Pytania i odpowiedzi. Tło filozoficzne, teoria i zastosowania praktyczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper.
Google Scholar

Bruin, John. 2001. Homo Interrogans. Questioning and the Intentional Structure of Cognition. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Google Scholar

Crosby, John F. 1983. ”Reinach’s Discovery of the Social Acts”. Aletheia 3: 143–194.
Google Scholar

Daubertiana A I 2.
Google Scholar

Fales, Walter. 1943. ”Phenomenology of Questions”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4(1): 60–75.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2103005

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1990. Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 1: Wahrheit und Methode, Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1995. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 60: Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag.
Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2002. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 18: Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie. Edited by Mark Michalski. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag.
Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2006. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Google Scholar

Held, Klaus. 2010. Phänomenologie der politischen Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 2009. Logische Untersuchungen. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Google Scholar

Husserl, Gerhart. 1929. ”Recht und Welt”. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 10: 111–158.
Google Scholar

Ingarden, Roman. 1972. Z teorii języka i filozoficznych podstaw logiki. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Ingarden, Roman. 1988. O dziele literackim. Badania z pogranicza ontologii, teorii języka i filozofii literatury. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 2011. Dzieła zebrane. Vol. V. Toruń: Wydawnictwo UMK.
Google Scholar

Korolko, Mirosław. 1990. Sztuka retoryki. Przewodnik encyklopedyczny. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
Google Scholar

La Torre, Massimo. 2013. ”Hannah Arendt and the Concept of Law. Against the Tradition”. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 99(3): 400–416.
Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Fryderyk. 1904. Z genealogii moralności. Pismo polemiczne. Warszawa: Nakład Jakuba Mortkowicza.
Google Scholar

Perelman, Chaïm. 1984. Logika prawnicza. Nowa retoryka. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Pfänder, Alexander. 1982. ”Impertivenlehre”. In Pfänder-Studien. 287–324. Edited by Herbert Spiegelberg, Eberhard Avé-Lallemant. The Hague–Boston–London: Martinus Nijhoff Verlag.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7442-5_16

Płotka, Witold. 2012. ”Analiza struktury i geneza egzystencji: dwie postacie metody fenomenologicznej”. Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 40(3): 23–41.
Google Scholar

Płotka, Witold. 2012. ”Co pojęcie pytania wnosi do naszego zrozumienia fenomenologii? Między odnową i herezją”. Fenomenologia 10: 69–92.
Google Scholar

Płotka, Witold. 2012. ”Husserlian Phenomenology as Questioning: An Essay on the Transcendental Theory of the Question”. Studia Phaenomenologica 12: 311–329.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7761/SP.12.311

Reinach, Adolf. 1913. ”Die apriorischen Grundlagen des bürgerlichen Rechtes”. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 1(2): 685–847.
Google Scholar

Reinach, Adolf. 1983. The Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law. Translated by John F. Crosby. Aletheia 3: 1–142.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110329803.1

Reinach, Adolf. 1989. Sämtliche Werke. Textkritische Ausgabe in 2. Bänden. Vol. I: Werke. Edited by Karl Schuhmann, Barry Smith. München: Philosophia Verlag.
Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. 2003. O sobie samym jako innym. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Schuhmann, Karl. Barry Smith. 1987. ”Questions: An Essay in Daubertian Phenomenology”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47(3): 353–384.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2107595

Smith, Barry. 1990. ”Towards a History of Speech Act Theory”. In Speech Acts, Meanings and Intensions. Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle. Edited by Armin Burkhardt. Berlin–New York: De Gruyter.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859485.29

Sobota, Daniel R. 2012. Źródła i inspiracje Heideggerowskiego pytania o bycie. Vol. 1: Neokantyzm i fenomenologia. Bydgoszcz: Fundacja Kultury Yakiza.
Google Scholar

Sobota, Daniel R. 2013. Źródła i inspiracje Heideggerowskiego pytania o bycie. Vol. 2: Filozofia życia, filozofia religii i filozofia egzystencji. Bydgoszcz: Fundacja Kultury Yakiza.
Google Scholar

Sobota, Daniel R. 2018. Narodziny fenomenologii z ducha pytania. Johannes Daubert i fenomenologiczny rozruch. Warszawa: IFiS PAN.
Google Scholar

Zahavi, Dan. 2012. Fenomenologia Husserla. Kraków: WAM.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2020-03-28

How to Cite

Sobota, D. R. (2020). The Law and Question. The Phenomenon of Question as a Possible Point of Departure for the Phenomenologico-Genetic Theory of Law. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, 90, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.90.08

Issue

Section

Articles