John Mitchell Kemble’s Anglo-Germanic legal historiography

Authors

  • Michael Stuckey Barrister and Solicitor. Dean of the College of Law and Justice, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.91.05

Keywords:

Legal History, Legal Theory, Historiography, Anglo-Saxon Laws, Methodology

Abstract

Ideas about legal and constitutional systems in the British Isles, based upon a native genius, and ultimately upon the racial composition of the nation(s), were developed and deployed during the nineteenth century. The work of John Mitchell Kemble can be counted here amongst the developers of the literature informing this evolving historiographical norm of the Common Law tradition. Kemble’s work was fundamental to the establishment of a historical theory which underlay the development of the Common Law and its institutions with a specific and conscious Germanic attribution and constructed derivation. Kemble’s role was critical, in this creative discourse, as a polymath aggregator, whose work crossed modern-day conceptions of disciplinary boundaries. The developed and acquired Germanic historico-legal convention consistently emphasised a narrative of the Common Law’s uniqueness, and it was a tradition which eventually gained a fundamental intellectual position.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beard, Charles A. 1932. “The Teutonic Origins of Representative Government.” The American Political Science Review 26 (1): 28–44.
Google Scholar

Bentley, Michael. 2005. England’s Past: English Historiography in the Age of Modernism, 1870–1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Blaas, Petrus B.M. 1978. Continuity and Anachronism: Parliamentary and Constitutional Development in Whig Historiography and in the Anti-Whig Reaction Between 1890 and 1930. The Hague and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Google Scholar

Brooks, Chris. 1998. “Introduction: Historicism and the Nineteenth Century”. In The Study of the Past in the Victorian Age. Edited by Vanessa Brand. 1–20. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Google Scholar

Burrow, John W. 1981. A Liberal Descent: Victorian Historians and the English Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Burrow, John W. 1988. Whigs and Liberals: Continuity and Change in English Political Thought. New York: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Campbell, James. 2000. “Stubbs, Maitland, and Constitutional History”. In British and German Historiography, 1750–1950: Traditions, Perceptions and Transfers. Edited by Benedikt Stuchtey, Peter Wende. 99–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Cocks, Raymond C.J. 1988. Sir Henry Maine: A Study in Victorian Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Collini, Stefan. Donald Winch. John Burrow. 1983. That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Davies, R.R. 1979. Historical Perception: Celts and Saxons. Inaugural Lecture delivered at the University College of Wales, Aberystwyth (22nd of November, 1978). Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Google Scholar

Dawkins, William B. 1882. “The Ancient Ethnology of Wales”. Y Cymmrodor 5: 209–223.
Google Scholar

Dawkins, William B. 1889. The Place of the Welsh in the History of Britain. London: Simpkin Marshall.
Google Scholar

Dewey, Clive. 1972. “Images of the Village Community: A Study in Anglo-Saxon Ideology”. Modern Asian Studies 6 (3): 291–328.
Google Scholar

Dickins, Bruce. 1938. J.M. Kemble and Old English Scholarship. The Sir Israel Gollancz Memorial Lecture. London: The British Academy, 1938.
Google Scholar

Fisher, H.A.L. 1911. The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland. Vol. i–iii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Fleming, R. 1997. “Henry Adams and the Anglo-Saxons”. In The Preservation and Transmission of Anglo-Saxon Culture. Edited by Paul E. Szarmarch, Joel T. Rosenthal. 13–36. Michigan: Western Michigan University.
Google Scholar

Frantzen, Allan J. John D. Niles. Eds. 1997. Anglo-Saxonism and the Construction of Social Identity. Gainsville: University of Florida Press.
Google Scholar

Freeman, Edward A. 1872. “The Continuity of English History”. In Historical Essays. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Gentleman’s Magazine. New Series, i. 1834: 391–393.
Google Scholar

Gentleman’s Magazine. New Series, ii. 1834: 483–486.
Google Scholar

Gentleman’s Magazine. New Series, i. 1835: 42–44.
Google Scholar

Haferkamp, Hans Peter. 2018. Die Historische Rechtsschul. Frankfurt: Klostermann.
Google Scholar

Hollister, C. Warren. 1961. “The Norman Conquest and the Genesis of English Feudalism”. The American Historical Review 66 (3): 641–663.
Google Scholar

Hudson, John. 2007. F. W. Maitland and the Englishness of English Law. London: Selden Society.
Google Scholar

Kantorowicz, Hermann. 1937. “Savigny and the Historical School of Law”. Law Quarterly Review 53: 326–343.
Google Scholar

Kemble, Fanny. 1878. Record of a Girlhood. London: R. Bentley & Son.
Google Scholar

Kemble, John Mitchell. 1848. Codex Diplomaticus Aevi Saxonici. Vol. vi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Kemble, John Mitchell.1849. The Saxons in England. 1st ed. Vol. 2. London: Longman.
Google Scholar

Kemble, John Mitchell. 1876. The Saxons in England. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. London: Longman.
Google Scholar

Kliger, Samuel. 1945. “The Goths in England: An Introduction to the Gothic Vogue in Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Discussion”. Modern Philology 43 (2): 107–117
Google Scholar

Kliger, Samuel. 1952. The Goths in England: A Study in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Kohl, Philip L. Clare P. Fawcatt. Eds. 1995. Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Levine, Philippa. 1986. The Amateur and the Professional: Antiquarians, Historians and Archeologists in Victorian England, 1838–1886. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Lobban, Michael. 2012. “The Varieties of Legal History”. Clio@Themis 5: 1–29.
Google Scholar

Lubenow, William C. 1998. The Cambridge Apostles: 1820–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

MacDougall, Hugh A. 1982. Racial Myth in English History: Trojans, Teutons and Anglo-Saxons. Montreal: Harvest.
Google Scholar

Maine, Henry James Summer. 1861. Ancient Law: Its Convention with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas. London: John Murray.
Google Scholar

Maine, Henry James Summer. 1875. Effects of Observation of India on Modern European Thought. The Rede Lecture, delivered before the University of Cambridge, May 22, 1875. London: John Murray.
Google Scholar

Maine, Henry James Summer. 1883. Dissertation on Early Law and Customs. New York: Henry Holt.
Google Scholar

Maitland, Frederic William. 1897. Domesday Book and Beyond: Three Essays in the Early History of England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Mantena, Karuna. 2010. Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

McClelland, Charles E. 1971. The German Historians and England: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Views. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Melman, Billie. 1991. “Claiming the Nation’s Past: The Invention of an Anglo-Saxon Tradition”. Journal of Contemporary History 26: 575–595.
Google Scholar

Millon, David K. 1989. “Positivism in the Historiography of the Common Law”. Wisconsin Law Review: 669–714.
Google Scholar

Palgrave, Francis. 1867. History of the Anglo-Saxons. New ed. London: William Tegg.
Google Scholar

Piggott, Stuart. 1967. Celts, Saxons and the Early Antiquaries: The O’Donnell Lecture 1966. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar

Pocock, John G.A. 1987. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law – A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century: A Reissue with a Retrospect. Cambridge: University Press.
Google Scholar

Pollock, Frederick. Frederic William Maitland. 1898. A History of English Law. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Powicke, Maurice. 1931. Medieval England, 1066–1485. London: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Prestwich, John O. 1963. “Anglo-Norman Feudalism and the Problem of Continuity”. Past and Present 26: 39–57.
Google Scholar

Simmons, Clare A. 1900. Reversing the Conquest: History and Myth in 19th-Century British Literature. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Google Scholar

Stubbs, William. 1883. The Constitutional History of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Stuckey, Michael. 2006. “…this Society tendeth…” Elite Prosopography in Elizabethan Legal History”. Prosopon 1: 1–58.
Google Scholar

Stuckey, Michael. 2012. “Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Century English Humanism and Antiquarianism: The Prosopographical Method and Reflections on Historico-Legal Tradition”. Journal of Legal History 33 (1): 31–64.
Google Scholar

Vinogradoff, Paul. 1893. “Folkland”. The English Historical Review 8: 1–17.
Google Scholar

Vinogradoff, Paul. 1905. The Growth of the Manor. London: Allen & Unwin.
Google Scholar

Wiley, Raymond A. 1971. John Mitchell Kemble and Jakob Grimm: A Correspondence, 1832–1852. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar

Wiley, Raymond A., ed. 1981. “John Mitchell Kemble’s Review of Jakob Grimm’s Deutsche Grammatik”. Old English Newsletter Subsidia 6.
Google Scholar

Williams, Emyr W. 2014. “JE Lloyd and the Intellectual Foundations of Welsh History”. The National Library of Wales Journal 36 (1): 54–97.
Google Scholar

Williams, Howard. 2006. “Heathen Graves and Victorian Anglo-Saxonism: Assessing the Work of John Mitchell Kemble”. Anglo-Saxon Studies in Archaeology and History 13: 1–18.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2020-04-02

How to Cite

Stuckey, M. (2020). John Mitchell Kemble’s Anglo-Germanic legal historiography. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, 91, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.91.05