Mediation as a Factor Strengthening the Communicative Aspect of Law

Anna Kalisz

doi:10.18778/0208-6069.100.05

Authors

Anna Kalisz Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-0067

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.100.05

Keywords:

ontology of law, the essence of law, communication, law as communication, dialogue, mediation, legal dispute, decision

Abstract

When reviewing contemporary concepts of law, it is easy to notice that many of them emphasise the role of communication and dialogue in law. This paper is an attempt to link the philosophical aspect with legal practice, picturing both the basic ontological concepts based on the communicative aspect and the mediation as a form of dialogue in law application process. The aim is to draw attention to the correspondence between the mediation and deliberative democracy in the multi-centric legal reality. The conclusion indicates that the professionalisation of the profession of mediator shall help in such a process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexy, Robert. 1978. Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie das rationalen Diskurses als Theorie derristischen Begründung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s Empire. London: Fontana Press.
Google Scholar

Haarscher, Guy. 2005. “Some Contemporary Trends in Continental Philosophy of Law.” In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Edited by Martin P. Golding, William A. Edmundson. 300–312. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631228325.2004.00023.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631228325.2004.00023.x

Habermas, Jürgen. 1967. Theorie und Praxis. Neuwied Am Rhein–Berlin: Luchterhand.
Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Communication and Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar

Helleringer, Genevive. Kai Purnhagen. 2014. Towards European Legal Culture. Baden Baden–München–Oxford: Beck Hart Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845263632
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845263632

Hoecke, Mark van. 2002. Law as Communication. Oxford–Portland (OR): Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Arthur. 1985. Problemgeschichte der Rechtsphilosophie. Heidelberg: Winters.
Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Arthur. 1986. “Über die Wissenschaftlichkeit der Rechtswissenschaft.” Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialpilosophie 72(4): 425–442.
Google Scholar

Leśniewski, Norbert. 2000. „Mapa filozofii hermeneutycznej”. In O filozofii dzisiaj. Edited by Roman Kozłowski. 133–144. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM.
Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1983. Rechtssoziologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95699-6
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95699-6

Luhmann, Niklas. 1987. “The Unity of Legal System.” In Autopoietic Law Autopoietic Law. A New Approach to Law and Society. Edited by Gunther Teubner. 12–35. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110876451.12
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110876451.12

Oniszczuk, Jerzy. 2004. Koncepcje prawa. Warszawa: WSPiZ Koźmińskiego.
Google Scholar

Perelman, Chaim. 1979. The New Rhetorics and the Humanities. Esseys on Rhetorics and its Applications. London–Boston: Springer.
Google Scholar

Wronkowska, Sławomira. Zygmunt Ziembiński. 1997. Zarys teorii prawa. Poznań: Ars boni et aequi.
Google Scholar