The Necessity of Legal Typologies in Crisis and Emergency

Tormod Otter Johansen

doi:10.18778/0208-6069.96.06

Authors

Tormod Otter Johansen University of Gothenburg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-3898

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.96.06

Keywords:

exception, emergency, crisis, legal concepts, typology

Abstract

Legal analysis necessarily uses concepts, distinctions and typologies. These tools suffer challenges when the object of analysis or application is a crisis or emergency. The article looks into two examples of legal typologies of emergencies in the works of Gross and Ní Aiolaín and Agamben respectively. Based on this four levels of analysis for legal responses to emergencies is proposed: 1) explicit descriptions of actions by actors themselves, 2) positivist legal categories available in the context, 3) meta/comparative categories, and 4) philosophical/ontological concepts and categories that question or inquire into all the previous categories. The article concludes by discussing how these levels of analysis overlaps, merge and needs to be combined in order to grasp the complex phenomena of law in crisis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. “No to bio-political tattooing.” Le Monde, January 10, 2004.

Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1134d6w.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1134d6w.16

Dyzenhaus, David. 1997. Legality and legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen, and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Dyzenhaus, David. 2006. The constitution of law: Legality in a time of emergency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618246

Ferejohn, John. Pasquale Pasquino. 2004. “The law of the exception: A typology of emergency powers.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 2(2): 210–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.2.210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.2.210

Gross, Oren. 1999. “The Normless and Exceptionless Exception: Carl Schmitt’s Theory of Emergency Powers and the Norm-Exception Dichotomy.” Cardozo Law Review 21: 1825–1868.

Gross, Oren. Fionnuala Ní Aoláin. 2006. Law in times of crisis: emergency powers in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493997

Latour, Bruno. 2010. The making of law: an ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge: Polity.

Lazar, Nomi Claire. 2009. States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596704

Loevy, Karin. 2016. Emergencies in public law: the legal politics of containment. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316403556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316403556

Pirie, Fernanda. 2013. The anthropology of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696840.001.0001

Rossiter, Clinton. 1948. Constitutional dictatorship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Schmitt, Carl. 2004. Legality and legitimacy. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385769

Tingsten, Herbert. 1930. Regeringsmaktens expansion under och efter världskriget: studier över konstitutionell fullmaktslagstiftning. Lund: Gleerup.

Tingsten, Herbert. 1934. Les pleins pouvoirs: l’expansion des pouvoirs gouvernementaux pendant et après la grande guerre. Paris: Librairie Stock.

Venice Commission. 1995. Emergency Powers – Science and technique of democracy No. 12. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-STD(1995)012-e