Virtual reality as a tool for social researchers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2300-1690.24.08

Keywords:

virtual reality, VR, immersive virtual reality, social research, embodied agent

Abstract

The article focuses on the growing role of Virtual Reality (VR) technology in the field of social sciences. Various aspects of the use of VR technology in experimental research are discussed, focusing on the control of research conditions, environmental realism, monitoring and recording of participants’ behavior. The study presents examples of research that used VR to analyze social behavior, such as social facilitation and inhibition, psychosis, or participants’ reactions to extreme situations, such as the Milgram experiment. The value of the high level of ecological validity of experimental research conducted in the virtual reality environment was emphasized. The paper draws attention to the potential of VR technology as a social researcher’s tool in various contexts, while highlighting the challenges related to the characteristics of VR technology and its limitations that should be taken into account when designing a study. The presented arguments emphasize the importance of continuing research on the use of VR in the social sciences.

Author Biography

Aleksander Walas, Szkoła Doktorska Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego

Aleksander Walas – doktorant w Szkole Doktorskiej Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, absolwent Wydziału Ekonomiczno-Socjologicznego UŁ oraz Wydziału Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politologicznych UŁ. Zainteresowany badaniem zjawisk społecznych z wykorzystaniem technologii informacyjnych.

References

Anderson-Hanley, C., Arciero, P. J. (2011). Seniors cybercycling for cognitive health. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, S21–S22.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e530522011-009

Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J. (2004). Avatars. W: W. S. Bainbridge (red.), Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (ss. 64–68). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group.
View in Google Scholar

Baños, R. M, Botella, C., Perpiñá, C. (1999). Virtual reality and psychopathology. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 2(4), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1999.2.283
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1999.2.283

Biocca, F. (1992a). Communication within virtual reality. Creating a space for research. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00810.x
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00810.x

Biocca, F. (1992b). Virtual reality technology. A tutorial. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 23–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00811.x
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00811.x

Biocca, F., Delaney, B. (1995). Immersive virtual reality technology. W: F. Biocca, M. R. Levy (red.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (ss. 57–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
View in Google Scholar

Biocca, F., Kim, T., Levy, M. R. (1995). The vision of virtual reality. W: F. Biocca, M. R. Levy (red.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (ss. 3–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
View in Google Scholar

Botella, C., Baños, R. M., García-Palacios, A., Quero, S. (2017). Virtual reality and other realities. W: S. G. Hofmann, G. J. G. Asmundson (red.), The science of cognitive behavioral therapy (ss. 551–590). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803457-6.00022-2

Cipresso, P., Giglioli, I. A. C., Raya, M. A., Riva, G. (2018). The past, present, and future of virtual and augmented reality research: A network and cluster analysis of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086

De Borst, A. W., de Gelder, B. (2015). Is it the real deal? Perception of virtual characters versus humans: An affective cognitive neuroscience perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(576). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00576
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00576

Donath, J. (2007). Virtually trustworthy. Science, 317, 53–54. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1142770
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1142770

Doolani, S., Wessels, C., Kanal, V., Sevastopoulos, C., Jaiswal, A., Nambiappan, H. R., Makedon, F. (2020). A Review of Extended Reality (XR) Technologies for Manufacturing Training. Technologies, 8(4), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies8040077
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies8040077

Dunsmoor, J. E., Ahs, F., Zielinski, D. J., LaBar, K. S. (2014). Extinction in multiple virtual reality contexts diminishes fear reinstatement in humans. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 113, 157–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.02.010
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2014.02.010

Forbes, P. A. G., Pan, X., Hamilton, A. F. de. C. (2016). Reduced mimicry to virtual reality avatars in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 3788–3797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2930-2
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2930-2

Fox, J., Arena, D., Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 21(3), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95

Freeman, D., Pugh, K., Vorontsova, N. (2010). Testing the Continuum of Delusional Beliefs: An Experimental Study Using Virtual Reality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017514
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017514

Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: The Berkley Publishing Group.
View in Google Scholar

Hale, J., Hamilton, A. F. de. C. (2016). Testing the relationship between mimicry, trust and rapport in virtual reality conversations. Scientific Reports, 6, 35295. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35295
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35295

Huguet, P., Galvaing, M. P., Monteil, J. M., Dumas, F. (1999). Social Presence Effects in the Stroop Task: Further Evidence for an Attentional View of Social Facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1011–1025. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1011
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1011

Lanier, J., Biocca, F. (1992). An insider’s view of the future of virtual reality. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00816.x
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00816.x

Lewczuk, J. (2007). Rozpoznawanie mimicznej ekspresji emocji. Nowiny Psychologiczne, 3, 5–32.
View in Google Scholar

Loomis, J. M. (1992). Distal attribution and presence. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 113–119.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.113

MacDorman, K. (2006). Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familiarity, and eeriness: An exploration of the uncanny valley. ICCS/CogSci-2006 Long Symposium: Toward social mechanisms of android science. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241217609_Subjective_Ratings_of_Robot_Video_Clips_for_Human_Likeness_Familiarity_and_Eeriness_An_Exploration_of_the_Uncanny_Valley
View in Google Scholar

Mareschal, I., Calder, A. J., Clifford, C. W. G. (2013). Humans have an expectation that gaze is directed toward them. Current Biology, 23(8), 717–721. Pobrane z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3918857/
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.030

Milgram, P., Kishino, F. (1994) A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E77-D(12), 1321–1329. DOI: 10.1.1.102.4646
View in Google Scholar

Miller, M. R., Jun, H., Herrera, F., Villa, J. Y., Welch, G., Bailenson, J. N. (2019. Social interaction in augmented reality. PLoS One, 14(5), e0216290. 10.1371/journal.pone.0216290
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216290

Mori, M., MacDorman, K., Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811

Nieradka, P. (2021) Wzbogacona rzeczywistość a nierówności społeczne. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 66(2), 80–93.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2021.2.6

Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., Welch, G. F. (2018). A Systematic Review of Social Presence: Definition, Antecedents, and Implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5(114). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114

Okita, S. Y., Bailenson, J. N., Schwartz, D. L. (2008). The mere belief in social interaction improves learning. W: S. Barab, K. Hay, D. Hickey (red.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
View in Google Scholar

Okruszek, Ł., Rutkowska, A. (2013). Badanie kontroli wykonawczej za pomocą testu interferencji Stroopa u chorych na schizofrenię i osób z uszkodzeniami płatów czołowych. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 18(2), 215–255.
View in Google Scholar

Pan, X., Gillies, M., Barker, C., Clark, D. M., Slater, M. (2012). Socially anxious and confident men interact with a forward virtual woman: An experimental study. PLoS One, 7(4), e32931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032931
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032931

Pan, X., Hamilton, A. F. d. C. (2018). Why and how to use virtual reality to study human social interaction: The challenges of exploring a new research landscape. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 395–417 . https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12315
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12290

Piwek, L., McKay, L. S., Pollick, F. E. (2014). Empirical evaluation of the uncanny valley hypothesis fails to confirm the predicted effect of motion. Cognition, 130(3), 271–277. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.cognition.2013.11.001
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.001

Reeves, B., Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Saygin, A. P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J., Frith, C. D. (2012). The thing that should not be: Predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(4), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr025
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr025

Shiban, Y., Schelhorn, I., Pauli P, Mühlberger, A. (2015). Effect of combined multiple contexts and multiple stimuli exposure in spider phobia: A randomized clinical trial in virtual reality. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 71, 45–53. DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.014
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.014

Slater, M., Antley, A., Davison, A., Swapp, D., Guger, C., et al. (2006). A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments. PLoS One, 1(1), e39. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000039
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000039

Stephenson, N. (2009). Zamieć, tłum. J. Polak, Warszawa: ISA
View in Google Scholar

Sztejnberg, A., Jasiński, T. (2007). Proksemika w komunikacji społecznej. Płock: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Novum.
View in Google Scholar

Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faceson social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001

tom Dieck, D., tom Dieck, M. C., Jung, T., Moorhouse, N. (2018) Tourists’ virtual reality adoption: an exploratory study from Lake District National Park. Leisure Studies, 37(4), 371–383. DOI: 10.1080/02614367.2018.1466905
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2018.1466905

Vakil, E., Manovich, R., Ramati, E., Blachstein, H. (1996). The Stroop Color-Word task as a measure of selective attention: Efficiency in the elderly. Developmental Neuropsychology, 12(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649609540655
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649609540655

Walas, A. (2023). Immersive virtual reality as a social research environment. The impact of the presence of an embodied agent on the Stroop task performance. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica, 86.
View in Google Scholar

Wilk, A. K. (2018). Virtual reality – support or security threat? Journal of Modern Science, 39(4), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/85645
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/85645

Wojciszke, B. (2002). Człowiek wśród ludzi. Zarys psychologii społecznej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
View in Google Scholar

Zając, J., Wojciszke, B. (2016). W poszukiwaniu substytutu fizycznej obecności człowieka: wpływ wirtualnego asystenta na skuteczność wykonania zadań. Psychologia Społeczna, 4(39), 440–457.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2023-11-24

How to Cite

Walas, A. (2023). Virtual reality as a tool for social researchers. Władza Sądzenia, (24), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.18778/2300-1690.24.08

Issue

No. 24 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.