Systemic Intertextuality. A Morphogenetic Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-2931.10.24

Keywords:

intertextuality, system theory, structuration, morphogenesis, social capital, cultural capital

Abstract

If late modern literary production is structured by any principles rendering order to the otherwise nebular character of the process, this is the idea of intertextuality that paves the way for the dissolution of well entrenched structures, literary conventions and institutionalized canons. By fostering and facilitating the erosion of boundaries between elite and popular culture, mechanisms of intertextuality show that literature is not only a fixed collection of texts, but also a dynamic social system including structured practices of production and reception together with their institutional, cultural and technological determinants. The paper aims to provide a sociologically-oriented model of intertextual relations taking place within the social system of literature. In this context, circulation, dissemination, and recycling of literary motifs is viewed from a perspective of morphogenetic processes which result in the structural elaboration and systemic change due to the mobilization of social, cultural, and economic capitals in an effort to alter pre-existent practices of signification. Consequently, literature is discussed as an intertextual system in statu nascendi, a sphere of social practices that knows no sense of institutional boundaries or structural constraints.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Tomasz Burzyński, University of Silesia, Katowice

    Tomasz Burzyński received his PhD in 2009 from the University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland. He works at the Institute of Literary Studies where he teaches Sociology, Media Studies and Cultural Studies. His research interests include cultural studies and cultural theory, sociology of risk, theories of trust, and discourses of health and illness. Recent publications include: “Sociologizing Automotive Heritage. Traditions of Automobile Folklore and the Challenges of Risk Society” in The Routledge Companion to Automobile Heritage, Culture, and Preservation, ed. J. Clark and B. Stiefel, New York: Routledge, 2020; “Zrzucając maski. Refleksje na temat podmiotowości w świetle procesów (bio)medykalizacji” in ER(R)GO 37 (2018).

References

Allen, Graham. Intertextuality. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.

Archer, Margaret S. Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995. Print. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557675

Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Poetics. Ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: U of Michigan P, 1984. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1

Bakhtin, Mikhail, and Pavel Medvedev. The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship: A Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics. Trans. Albert J. Wehrle. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1978. Print.

Bakhtin, Mikhail, and Valentin Voloshinov. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. Ladislav Matejka and I. R. Titunik. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1986. Print.

Barthes, Roland. “Theory of the Text.” Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. Ed. Robert Young. London: Routledge, 1981. 31–47. Print.

Bauman, Zygmunt. Liquid Times. Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity, 2007. Print.

Beck, Ulrich. The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge: Polity, 2016. Print.

Beer, David. Popular Culture and New Media. The Politics of Circulation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Print. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137270061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137270061

Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Forms of Capital.” Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Ed. John G. Richardson. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1986. 241–58. Print.

Burzyński, Tomasz. Between the Stage and the Text. Agency and Structure in the Analysis of Cultural Change from the Perspectives of Trust and Uncertainty. Katowice: Wydawnictwo UŚ, 2014. Print.

Burzyński, Tomasz. “The Surplus of Structure. Towards the Morphogenetic Approach to Cultural Studies.” The Surplus of Culture. Sense, Common- Sense, Non-Sense. Ed. Ewa Borkowska and Tomasz Burzyński. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2011. 223–34. Print.

Castells, Manuel. “Materials for an Explanatory Theory of the Network Society.” British Journal of Sociology 51.1 (2000): 5–24. Print. https:// doi.org/10.1080/000713100358408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/000713100358408

Castells, Manuel. The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845421663

Derrida, Jacques. “Living On/Border Lines.” Deconstruction and Criticism. Ed. Harold Bloom et al. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul, 1979. 75–176. Print.

Eco, Umberto. Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984. Print. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9

Giddens, Anthony. Central Problems in Social Theory. Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: U of California P, 1979. Print.

Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity, 1984. Print.

Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeoise Society. Trans. Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence. Boston: MIT, 1991. Print.

Kalaga, Wojciech. “Culture and Signification.” Britishness and Cultural Studies. Continuity and Change in Narrating the Nation. Ed. Krzysztof Knauer and Simon Murray. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Śląsk, 2000. 51–69. Print.

Lee, Benjamin, and Edward LiPuma. “Cultures of Circulation: The Imaginations of Modernity.” Public Culture 14.1 (2002): 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-1-191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-1-191

Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Sztompka, Piotr. Society in Action. The Theory of Social Becoming. Cambridge: Polity, 1991. Print.

Sztompka, Piotr. Trust. A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999. Print.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-24

How to Cite

Burzyński, Tomasz. 2020. “Systemic Intertextuality. A Morphogenetic Perspective”. Text Matters: A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture, no. 10 (November): 433-45. https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-2931.10.24.