In the Flesh and the Gothic Pharmacology of Everyday Life; or Into and Out of the Gothic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/texmat-2016-0014Abstract
One of the key questions facing Gothic Studies today is that of its migration into and out of its once familiar generic or symbolic modes of representation. The BBC series In the Flesh addresses these concerns against the background of a neoliberal medical culture in which pharmaceutical treatments have become powerful tools of socio-economic normalization, either through inducing passivity or in heightening productivity, generating chemically adapted biomachines tuned to think and produce. But the pharmakon has always been a risky form of normalization, its poisonous mechanisms threatening to undo its helpful patterns by stealth. This essay discusses the pharmacological and medical contexts of the series in which zombies are subjected to medical management and normalized as “PDS sufferers,” thereby locating In the Flesh in terms of an already gothicized neoliberal pharmacology of everyday life. It also enquires how the proximity of the symbolic pharmacology of the series to neoliberal medical discourses and practices actually challenges traditional representational patterns of the Gothic and whether the Gothic can still have a role as an alternative cure to society’s ills.
Downloads
References
Abraham, John. “Sociology of Pharmaceuticals Development and Regulation: A Realist Empirical Research Programme.” Sociology of Health and Illness 30 (2008): 869–85. Print.
Google Scholar
Åsberg, Cecilia, and Jennifer Lum. “PharmAD-ventures: A Feminist Analysis of the Pharmacological Imaginary of Alzheimer’s Disease.” Body & Society 15.4 (2009): 95–117. Print.
Google Scholar
Baldick, Chris, and Robert Mighall. “Gothic Criticism.” A Companion to the Gothic. Ed. David Punter. Malden: Blackwell, 2008. 209–28. Print.
Google Scholar
Blackman, Lisa. “Psychiatric Culture and Bodies of Resistance.” Body & Society 13.2 (2007): 1–23. Print.
Google Scholar
Blake, Linnie. “The Burton and Swinburne Trilogy: Steam-Age Adventures in Neo-Liberal Liminality: An Interview with Mark Hodder.” Gothic.stir.ac.uk. Web. 25 July 2015.
Google Scholar
Blake, Linnie. “Neoliberal Adventures in Neo-Victorian Biopolitics. Mark Hodder’s Burton and Swinburne Novels.” Technologies of the Gothic in Literature and Culture. Ed. Justin D. Edwards. Basingstoke: Routledge, 2015. 166–78. Print.
Google Scholar
Blake, Linnie. “Vampires, Mad Scientists and the Unquiet Dead: TV Ubiquity and the Gothic’s Own Demise.” Gothic in Contemporary Popular Culture: PopGoth. Ed. Justin D. Edwards and Agnieszka Soltysik Monnet. Basingstoke: Routledge, 2012. 37–56. Print.
Google Scholar
Blake, Linnie, and Agnieszka Soltysik Monnet, eds. International Gothic in the Neoliberal Age. Manchester: Manchester UP, forthcoming. Print.
Google Scholar
Byron, Glennis. Introduction. Globalgothic. Ed. Glennis Byron. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2013. 1–10. Print
Google Scholar
Cameron, David. “Leader’s Speech. Conservative Party Conference 2009.” Britishpoliticalspeech.org. Web. 25 Aug. 2015.
Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. Profit Over People: Neoliberalism and Global Order. New York: 7 Stories, 1999. Print.
Google Scholar
Cooper, Melinda. Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle, London: U of Washington P, 2008. Print.
Google Scholar
Crane, Johanna. “Adverse Events and Placebo Effects: African Scientists, HIV, and Ethics in the Global Health Sciences.” Social Studies of Science 40.6 (2010): 843–70. Print.
Google Scholar
Davison, Carol Margaret. “‘Houses of Voluntary Bondage’: Theorizing the Nineteenth-Century Gothic Pharmography.” Gothic Studies 12.1 (2010): 68–85. Print.
Google Scholar
Deyo, Darwyyn, and David Mitchell. “Trading with the Undead: A Study in Specialization and Comparative Advantage.” Economics of the Undead. Zombies, Vampires, and the Dismal Science. Ed. Glen Whitman and James Dow. New York: Rowman, 2014. 111–22. Print.
Google Scholar
Fisher, Mark. Capitalist Realism. Is There No Alternative? Ropley: Zero, 2008. Print.
Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah, and Margaret Lock. “Animation and Cessation. The Remaking of Life and Death.” Remaking Life & Death. Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences. Ed. Sarah Franklin and Margaret Lock. Santa Fe, Oxford: School of American Research P and James Curry, 2003. 3–22. Print.
Google Scholar
Giroux, Henry A. “The Politics of Disimagination and the Pathologies of Power.” Truthout.org. Web. 22 July 2015.
Google Scholar
Giroux, Henry A. Zombie Politics and Culture in the Age of Casino Capitalism. New York: Lang, 2014. Print.
Google Scholar
Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005. Print.
Google Scholar
Healy, David. “Good Science or Good Business.” Hastings Centre Report 30.2 (2000): 19–22. Print.
Google Scholar
Healy, David. “The Psychopharmacological Era: Notes Toward a History.” Journal of Psychopharmacology 4 (1990): 152–67. Print. doi: 10.1177/026988119000400310
Google Scholar
Hogarth, Stuart. “Working Paper 41. Neoliberal Technocracy: Explaining How and Why the US Food and Drug Administration Has Championed Pharmacogenetics.” Unpubl. MS.
Google Scholar
Hogle, Jerrold E. “The Gothic Ghost of the Counterfeit and the Progress of Abjection.” A Companion to the Gothic. Ed. David Punter. Malden: Blackwell, 2008. 293–304. Print.
Google Scholar
In the Flesh. Series One and Two. Dir. Jonny Campbell, Jim O’Hanlon, Damon Thomas and Alice Troughton. Created by Dominick Mitchell. BBC, 2014. DVD.
Google Scholar
Jackson, Rosemary. Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London: Routledge, 1981. Print.
Google Scholar
James, Oliver. The Selfish Capitalist. New York, London: Vermilion, 2008. Print.
Google Scholar
Kirk, Robert. Zombies and Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon, 2005. Print.
Google Scholar
Kliś, Agnieszka. “The Marginality of the Gothic: A Reconsideration.” Text Matters 2.2 (2012): 97–114. Print.
Google Scholar
Knapton, Sarah. “Have Scientists Found a Drug to Stop Alzheimer’s Disease.” Thetelegraph.co.uk. The Telegraph 19 July 2015. Web. 25 Aug. 2015.
Google Scholar
Levina, Marina, and Diem-My T. Bui. “Introduction: Towards a Comprehensive Monster Theory in the 21st Century.” Monster Culture in the 21st Century: A Reader. Ed. Marina Levina and Diem-My T. Bui. New York: Bloomsbury, 2014: 1–13. Print.
Google Scholar
Lock, Margaret. “On Making Up the Good-as-Dead in a Utilitarian World.” Remaking Life & Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences. Ed. Sarah Franklin and Margaret Lock. Santa Fe, Oxford: School of American Research P and James Curry, 2003. 165–92. Print.
Google Scholar
Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. Medicinescomplete.com. Web. 25 Aug. 2015
Google Scholar
Mbeme, Achille. “Necropolitics.” Trans. Libby Meintjes. Public Culture 15 (2003): 11–40. Print.
Google Scholar
Miles, Robert. “Popular Romanticism and the Problem of Belief.” Ann Radcliffe: Romanticism and the Gothic. Ed. Dale Townshend and Angela Wright. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2014: 117–34. Print.
Google Scholar
Murnane, Barry. “George Best’s Dead Livers. Transplanting the Gothic into Biotechnology and Medicine.” Technologies of the Gothic in Literature and Culture. Ed. Justin D. Edwards. New York: Routledge, 2015: 113–26. Print.
Google Scholar
Persson, Asha. “Incorporating Pharmakon: HIV, Medicine, and Body Shape Change.” Body&Society 10.4 (2004): 45–67. Print.
Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie. “Zombie Neoliberalism and the Ambidextrous State.” Theoretical Criminology 14 (2010): 104–10. Print.
Google Scholar
Pitts-Taylor, Victoria. “The Plastic Brain: Neoliberalism and the Neuronal Self.” Health 14.6 (2010): 635–52. Print.
Google Scholar
Prince, J. B., et al. “A Controlled Study of Nortriptyline in Children and Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.” Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology 10.3 (2002): 193–204. Print.
Google Scholar
Pringle, Evelyn. “Why are We Drugging Our Kids?” Alternet.org. Web. 22 July 2015.
Google Scholar
Punter, David. The Literature of Terror: A History of Gothic Fictions from 1765 to the Present Day. London: Longman, 1980. Print.
Google Scholar
Quiggan, John. Zombie Economics. How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2010. Print.
Google Scholar
Rawlinson, Kevin, and Frances Perraudin. “DWP Admits Inventing Quotes from Fake ‘Benefits Claimants’ for Sanctions Leaflet.” Theguardian.com. The Guardian 18 Aug. 2015. Web. 25 Aug. 2015.
Google Scholar
“Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death, A Definition of ‘Irreversible Coma.’” Journal of the American Medical Association 205 (1968): 337–40. Print.
Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. The Politics of Life Itself. Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007. Print.
Google Scholar
Shaviro, Steve. “Capitalist Monsters.” Historical Materialism 10.4 (2002): 281–90. Print.
Google Scholar
Spooner, Catherine. Contemporary Gothic. London: Reaktion, 2006. Print.
Google Scholar
Stiegler, Bernard. For a New Critique of Political Economy. Trans. Daniel Ross. Cambridge: Polity, 2010. Print.
Google Scholar
Stiegler, Bernard. Taking Care of Youth and of the Generations. Trans. Stephen Barker. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2010. Print.
Google Scholar
Townshend, Dale. Interview by Stephanie Gallon. Spectralvisions.wordpress.com. Web. 25 Aug. 2015.
Google Scholar
Whitman, Glen, and James Dow. “Introduction. Living Dead in the Modern Economy.” Economics of the Undead. Zombies, Vampires, and the Dismal Science. Ed. Glen Whitman and James Dow. New York: Rowman, 2014. ix–xi. Print.
Google Scholar
Wyatt, Daisy. “Benefits Street Sparks Ofcom Probe after 1,800 Complaints.” Theindependent.co.uk. The Independent 25 Feb. 2014. Web. 24 Aug. 2015.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.