Affective Realities and Conceptual Contradictions of Patricia Piccinini’s Art: Ecofeminist and Disability Studies Perspectives

Edyta Lorek-Jezińska

doi:10.18778/2083-2931.12.22

Authors

Edyta Lorek-Jezińska Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5492-4255

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-2931.12.22

Keywords:

Patricia Piccinini, ecofeminism, disability aesthetics, the uncanny

Abstract

The recent exhibition of Patricia Piccinini’s art called That’s Us (Toruń, CSW) largely represents the Australian artist’s visions and fascinations known from earlier exhibitions. Questioning and erasing the borders between species, the affective realities of Piccinini’s art are bound to the concepts of care, empathy and fragility, which refigure what is human and non-human and the relations between them by expanding the notion of mothering and fostering to include interspecies relations. Beginning with a discussion of the uncanny, abjection and monstrosity, this article aims to examine the complicated implications of interpreting Piccinini’s art within the conceptual framework of ecofeminism, as well as in the context of disability aesthetics. In her explorations of different and alternative corporealities, Piccinini, among many other things, asks questions about ideologies of normativity and able-bodiedness, suggesting the possibility of going beyond them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Edyta Lorek-Jezińska, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń

Edyta Lorek-Jezińska is Associate Professor in the Department of Anglophone Literature, Culture and Comparative Studies, at Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. Her research interests include disability studies and disability drama, trauma studies and hauntology, as well as performance, art and archive. She has published on site and environment in performance, as well as gender, intertextuality, corporeality, trauma and hauntology in drama and theatre. She is the author of Hauntology and Intertextuality in Contemporary British Drama by Women Playwrights (2013), The Hybrid in the Limen: British and Polish Environment-Oriented Theatre (2003) and co-editor of the themed issues of Theoria et Historia Scientiarum (Spectrality and Cognition: Haunted Cultures, Ghostly Communications, 2017), AVANT. Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies (Haunted Cultures/Haunting Cultures, 2017; Listening to the Urbanocene: People-Sounds-Cities, 2020; Altering Authorships: The Author Function in Contemporary Cultural and Literary Practices, 2021) and Rock Music Studies (The Residents, 2021).

References

Adams, Rachel. Sideshow U.S.A.: Freaks and American Cultural Imagination. U of Chicago P, 2001.

Antonsen, Dea. “Embrace the Unknown—Patricia Piccinini and the Aesthetics of Care.” Patricia Piccinini: Jesteśmy!/That’s Us! (Catalogue), Fundacja Sztuki Świata, 2021, pp. 112–18.

Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and his World. Translated by Helene Iswolsky. Indiana UP, 1984.

Barad, Karen. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs, vol. 28, no. 3, 2003, pp. 801–31. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/345321

Braidotti, Rosi. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. Columbia UP, 1994.

Canguilhem, Georges. “Monstrosity and the Monstrous.” The Body: A Reader, edited by Mariam Fraser and Monica Greco, Routledge, 2005, pp. 187–93. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060338-30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060338-30

Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost. “Introducing New Materialisms.” New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, edited by Diana Coole and Samantha Frost, Duke UP, 2010, pp. 1–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw2wk DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392996-001

Dunn, Dana S. The Social Psychology of Disability. Oxford UP, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933815.013.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933815.013.003

Freud, Sigmund. “The ‘Uncanny.’” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Volume XVII, translated by James Strachey, Hogarth, 1981, pp. 219–53.

Frist Art Museum. “Fairy Tales, Monsters and the Genetic Imagination with Frist Center Curator Mark Scala.” YouTube.com, uploaded by Frist Art Museum, 16 Mar. 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fkHB-Z1rYw accessed 20 Oct. 2018.

Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. “Introduction: From Wonder to Error—A Genealogy of Freak Discourse in Modernity.” Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body, edited by Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, New York UP, 1996, pp. 1–22.

Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. Staring: How We Look. Oxford UP, 2009.

Haraway, Donna J. “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin.” Environmental Humanities, no. 6, 2015, pp. 159–65. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615934

Haraway, Donna J. “Speculative Fabulations for Technoculture’s Generations: Taking Care of Unexpected Country.” The Multispecies Salon, edited by Eben Kirksey, Duke UP, 2014, pp. 242–61. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376989-016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376989-016

Harris, Anne M., and Stacy Holman Jones. The Queer Life of Things: Performance, Affect, and the More-Than-Human. Lexington, 2019.

Kristeva, Julia. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Translated by Leon S. Roudiez. Columbia UP, 1982.

Lewis, Victoria Ann. Introduction. Beyond Victims and Villains: Contemporary Plays by Disabled Playwrights, edited by Victoria Ann Lewis, Theatre Communications Group, 2006, pp. xiii–xlv.

Linton, Simi. Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York UP, 1998.

Longmore, Paul K., and David Goldenberg. “The League of the Physically Handicapped and the Great Depression: A Case Study in the New Disability History.” The Journal of American History, December 2000, pp. 888–922. https://doi.org/10.2307/2675276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2675276

Mellor, Mary. Feminism and Ecology. New York UP, 1997.

Merchant, Carolyn. Earthcare: Women and the Environment. Routledge, 1996.

Orning, Sara E. S. “Staging Humanimality: Patricia Piccinini and a Genealogy of Species Intermingling.” Animalities: Literary and Cultural Studies Beyond the Human, edited by Michael Lundblad, Edinburgh UP, 2017, pp. 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474400039-007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474400039-007

Pellow, David N. Foreword. The Intersectionality of Critical Animal, Disability, and Environmental Studies, edited by Anthony J. Nocella II, Amber E. George and J. L. Schatz, Lexington, 2017, pp. xiii–xiv.

Piccinini, Patricia. Interview by Jane Messenger. Patricia Piccinini, 2011, https://www.patriciapiccinini.net/a-essay.php?id=36 accessed 22 Apr. 2019.

Piccinini, Patricia. Interview by The Condition Report. Patricia Piccinini, 2014, https://www.patriciapiccinini.net/a-essay.php?id=103 accessed 22 Apr. 2019.

Piccinini, Patricia. That’s Us. 29 Oct. 2021–10 Apr. 2022, Centre of Contemporary Art in Toruń.

Piccinini, Patricia. “The Naturally Artificial World.” Interview by Laura Orgaz. Patricia Piccinini, 2007, https://www.patriciapiccinini.net/a-essay.php?id=29 accessed 22 Apr. 2019.

Piccinini, Patricia. “Your Place is My Place.” Interview by Rosi Braidotti. Patricia Piccinini, 2019, https://www.patriciapiccinini.net/a-essay.php?id=110 accessed 22 Apr. 2019.

Rigby, Kate. “Women and Nature Revisited: Ecofeminist Reconfigurations of an Old Association.” Feminist Ecologies Changing Environments in the Anthropocene, edited by Lara Stevens, Peta Tait and Denise Varney, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, pp. 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64385-4_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64385-4_4

Rosa, Hartmunt, Christof Henning, and Arthur Bueno. “Introduction: Critical Theory and New Materialisms—fit, strain or contradiction.” Critical Theory and New Materialisms, edited by Hartmunt Rosa, Christof Henning and Arthur Bueno, Routledge, 2021, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429289262-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429289262-1

Schatz, L. J., Amber E. George, and Anthony J. Nocella II. “Introduction: The Environment, Animals, and Disability Justice Within the Liberation Movement.” The Intersectionality of Critical Animal, Disability, and Environmental Studies, edited by Anthony J. Nocella II, Amber E. George and J. L. Schatz, Lexington, 2017, pp. xix–xxvii.

Siebers, Tobin. Disability Aesthetics. U of Michigan P, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.1134097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.1134097

Siebers, Tobin. “The Art of Disability.” Interview by Mike Levin. Disability Studies Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, 2010, https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1263/1272 accessed 20 July 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v30i2.1263

Shapiro, Joseph P. No Pity: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. Three Rivers, 1994.

Walker, Linda Marie. “The Impossible Being Becomes (Possibly).” Innovation and Tradition: The Arts, Humanities and the Knowledge Economy, edited by Jane Kenway, Elizabeth Bullen and Simon Robb, Peter Lang, 2004, pp. 46–57.