Traditional Polish Attire in the Context of Eastern and Western Influences

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-851X.18.02

Keywords:

tunic, attire, Mongols, Byzantium, sash, silk, Polish kontusz garment

Abstract

Clothes in both Europe and Western Asia owe their basic shape to ancient clothing. Therefore, in the early development of fashion, they were the result of various interpretations imitating the construction of tunics. Later diversified forms of clothing in both Europe and Western Asia are the result of centuries of changes resulting from the transformation of one basic form, which was the ancient tunic.

The genesis of Polish kontusz garments has long been rightly associated with the East. This fashion, created at the end of the 16th century and at the beginning of the 17th century, developed on the basis of inspirations from peoples with whom Poland was almost always, almost continuously, in conflict, and Eastern societies were spoken of with a tinge of contempt. However, their way of dressing, especially of the upper classes in many Eastern countries, where the influence of the Mongol tribal aristocracy was combined with the highly developed Byzantine culture, differed significantly from the canons of European fashion, they were original, which in the Commonwealth meant that by wearing clothes in accordance with the basic line typical of Eastern clothing, one gained a sense of distinctiveness, uniqueness, and magnificence. It should be emphasized that clothing in the vast areas of Asia with time began to consist of two basic elements: the bottom – similar in appearance to the żupan later created in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and the outer clothing put on it – similar to the kontusz.

In the Middle East, an important period of development, also due to the process of forming clothing, was the Mongol period (1206–1368), which was a turning point in cultural, political and artistic exchange throughout Eurasia. The dynamic international exchange at that time resulted in Mongolian motifs appearing in large numbers among patterns of fabrics, miniatures, ceramics and metalwork. By the end of the thirteenth century, elements of Mongolian culture had reached the Mediterranean Sea and began to influence the art and clothing of the Latin West. Painted representations of Mongols, silk fabrics with original motifs, clothes whose different shapes began to feed the art and culture of the Christian West became widespread.

An example of the presence of these influences can be the well-known painting from the collection of the Diocesan Museum in Tarnów „The Lamented of Chomranice”, dated around 1440, in which Joseph of Arimathea dressed in a long caftan with short sleeves, probably made of Byzantine silk, as evidenced by a pattern consisting of pomegranate fruits closed with lanceolate leaves and a silk turban, from under which a long black braid falls on his back. The appearance and clothing depicted in this way are unequivocally associated with the representations of the elite of Mongol rulers appearing on Persian miniatures, especially those created during the reign of the Ilhanid dynasty in Persia. In Western literature, this problem has been discussed in more detail in articles on the similarity of the scene depicting the martyrdom of the Franciscans in Ceuta in 1277 painted by Ambrogio Lorenzetti in the Franciscan monastery in Siena in 1324–1327 and the miniatures by Rashid al-Din, which are direct evidence of the knowledge of Persian miniatures by Italian painters.

It is therefore worth noting that many details described in the literature as features of Mongolian clothing can also be found much later in the shape of Polish kontusz clothing.

References

BIEDROŃSKA-SŁOTA 2010 – B. Biedrońska-Słota, Sarmatyzm. Sen o potędze, Kraków 2010.
Google Scholar

BIEDROŃSKA-SŁOTA 2022 – B. Biedrońska-Słota, Gust artystyczny czasów króla Jana III Sobieskiego, „Sztuka i Krytyka” 2022, nr 3, s. 14–32.
Google Scholar

BIEDROŃSKA-SŁOTA, MOLENDA 2023 – B. Biedrońska-Słota, M. Molenda, Kontusz. Z dziejów polskiego ubioru narodowego, Kraków 2023.
Google Scholar

BLAIR 1995 – S. Blair, A Compendium of Chronicles. Rashid al.-Din’s Illustrated History of the World, (Nasser D. Khalili Collection of Islamic Art., 27), Oxford 1995.
Google Scholar

GADOMSKI 1995 – J. Gadomski, Gotyckie malarstwo tablicowe Małopolski 1420–1470, Warszawa 1995.
Google Scholar

GUMIŁOW 1972 – L. Gumiłow, Dzieje dawnych Turków, Warszawa 1972.
Google Scholar

HALBERTSMA-HEROLD 2008 – U. Halbertsma-Herold, Clothing Authority: Mongol Attire and Textiles in the Sicio-political Complex, Master’s thesis, Leiden University, 2008.
Google Scholar

HOFFMAN 2001 – E. R. Hoffman, Pathways of Portability: Islamic and Christian Interchange from the tenth to the twelfth century, „Art History”, vol. 24, no. 1, February 2001, s. 17–50.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8365.00248

KOŁODZIEJCZYK 2017 – D. Kołodziejczyk, Stosunki dawnej Rzeczypospolitej z Turcją i Tatarami: czy naprawdę byliśmy przedmurzem Europy?, „Praktyka Teoretyczna” 2017, nr 4 (26), s. 16–36.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/prt.2017.4.1

Ludy tureckie – Ludy tureckie, Wikipedia, https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludy_tureckie (dostęp: 11.09.2024).
Google Scholar

ŁANUSZKA 2016 – M. Łanuszka, O kilku ciekawych motywach ikonograficznych w Opłakiwaniu z Chomranic, [w:] Imagines pictae. Studia nad malarstwem gotyckim w Polsce, red. W. Walanus, M. Walczak, Kraków 2016, s. 65–78.
Google Scholar

MAŃKOWSKI 1946 – T. Mańkowski, Genealogia sarmatyzmu, Warszawa 1946.
Google Scholar

PRAZNIAK 2010 – R. Prazniak, Siena on the Silk Roads: Ambrogio Lorenzetti and the Mongol Global Century, 1250–1350, „Journal of World History”, Vol. 21, No. 2 (June 2010), pp. 177–217.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.0.0123

SHEA 2020 – E. Shea, Mongol Court Dress, Identity Formation, and Global Exchange Flyer, Taylor & Francis Ltd 2020.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429340659

SULIMIRSKI 1979 – T. Sulimirski, Sarmaci, Warszawa 1979.
Google Scholar

The Legacy of Genghis Khan 2003 – The Legacy of Genghis Khan. Courtly Art and Culture in Western Asia, 1256–1353, catalogue of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, ed. L. Komaroff, S. Carboni, New York–New Haven–London 2003, fig. 133, cat. nr 21.
Google Scholar

ULEWICZ 1949 – T. Ulewicz, Około genealogii sarmatyzmu (Spóźnione podjęcie nieprzedawnionej dyskusji), „Pamiętnik Słowiański”, I, 1949, s. 101–114.
Google Scholar

ULEWICZ 1950 – T. Ulewicz, Sarmacja. Studium z problematyki słowiańskiej XV i XVI w., Kraków 1950.
Google Scholar

ULEWICZ 2006 – T. Ulewicz, Sarmacja. Zagadnienie sarmatyzmu, Kraków 2006.
Google Scholar

WYSZYŃSKA 2016 – A. Wyszyńska, Nikodem zorientalizowany, czyli o potrzebie podjęcia badań kostiumologicznych nad piętnastowiecznym małopolskim malarstwem tablicowym na przykładzie Opłakiwania z Chomranic, [w:] Panulae pictae. Studia z dziejów malarstwa gotyckiego w Polsce, red. M. Walczak, W. Walanus, Kraków 2016.
Google Scholar

ZAJĄCZKOWSKI 1966 – A. Zajączkowski, Orientalistyka polska a Bliski Wschód, [w:] Szkice z dziejów polskiej orientalistyki, red. J. Reychman, Warszawa 1966, s. 31.
Google Scholar

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Biedrońska-Słota, B. (2024). Traditional Polish Attire in the Context of Eastern and Western Influences. TECHNE. Seria Nowa, 2(14), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-851X.18.02

Issue

Section

Articles