The Institutionalization of Shakespeare Studies in the United Kingdom

Robert Sawyer

doi:10.18778/2083-8530.27.02

Authors

Robert Sawyer East Tennessee State University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.27.02

Crossmark check for up

Keywords:

I. A. Richards, William Empson, Arthur-Quiller Couch, F. R. Leavis, 'Scrutiny' Magazine, 'The Newbolt Report', Caroline Spurgeon

Abstract

This essay is devoted to Shakespearean criticism in the UK between 1920 and 1940. I begin by examining the origins of Shakespeare study at Oxford and Cambridge, by figures such as I. A. Richards (1929) and William Empson (1930). I follow this by looking at F. R. Leavis and his journal Scrutiny, but I also trace his influence on his fellow Cambridge colleagues highlighting instances where they collaborated, as did Caroline Spurgeon with Arthur Quiller-Couch (the latter two co-editors of the New Cambridge Shakespeare series, 1921-1966) on the famous 1921 study for the British Board of Education entitled “The Teaching of English in England”—also referred to as The Newbolt Report, after the chairman of the committee, Sir Henry Newbolt.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Robert Sawyer, East Tennessee State University, USA

is Professor of English at East Tennessee State University, where he teaches Shakespeare, Victorian Literature, and Literary Criticism. His books include Victorian Appropriations of Shakespeare (2003), Marlowe and Shakespeare: The Critical Rivalry (2017), and Shakespeare Between the World Wars (2019); he was also co-editor of Performing Shakespearean Appropriations (2022). He has also published essays on popular figures such as Orson Welles, Jerry Lee Lewis, and, most recently, on Paul Robeson.

References

Baldick, Chris. The Social Mission of English Criticism, 1848-1932. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan. The Genius of Shakespeare, 10th Anniversary Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Google Scholar

Bennett, Joan. “How it Strikes a Contemporary: The Impact of I. A. Richards’ Literary Criticism in Cambridge, England.” In Brower, Ruben, Helen Vendler, and John Hollander. I. A. Richards: Essays in his Honor. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973: 45-59.
Google Scholar

Brower, Ruben, Helen Vendler, and John Hollander. I. A. Richards: Essays in his Honor. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.
Google Scholar

Cary, Hugh. Mansfield Forbes and His Cambridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Google Scholar

Childs, Donald J. The Birth of New Criticism: Conflict and Conciliation in the Early Work of William Empson, I. A. Richards, Laura Riding, and Robert Graves. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2013.
Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. “The Rise of English.” Literary Theory: An Introduction. University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
Google Scholar

Empson, William. Essays on Shakespeare. Ed. David W. Pirie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Google Scholar

Empson, William. Seven Types of Ambiguity, 2nd ed. Great Britain, New Directions, 1947.
Google Scholar

Empson, William. Reviews by Empson originally printed in the Cambridge Magazine: Granta, 1927-1929. Tunbridge Wells. Reprinted in Kent: The Foundling Press, 1993.
Google Scholar

Fekete, John. The Critical Twilight. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.
Google Scholar

Gordon, G. S. “The Discipline of Letters,” Oxford Inaugural Lecture, 1923, in The Discipline of Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946.
Google Scholar

Gross, John. The Rise and Fall of the Man of Letters. London: Macmillan, 1969.
Google Scholar

Hawkes, Terence. “The Institutionalization of Literature: The University.” Encyclopedia of Literature and Criticism. Eds. Martin Coyle, Peter Garside, Malcom Kelsall and John Peck. London: Routledge, 1991. 926-938.
Google Scholar

Hawkes, Terence. “Swisser Swatter: Making a Man of English Letters.” That Shakespeherian Rag. London: Routledge, 1986. 51-72.
Google Scholar

Hilliard, Christopher. English as a Vocation. The “Scrutiny” Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Google Scholar

Mulhern, Francis. The Moment of “Scrutiny.” London: Verso, 1981.
Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew. Shakespeare for the People: Working Class Readers, 1800-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Google Scholar

The Newbolt Report, “The Teaching of English in England,” 1921. http://www.education england.org.uk/documents/newbolt/newbolt1921.html/. Accessed 25 October 2022.
Google Scholar

Olive, Sarah. “The Newbolt Report.” In Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare. 2 Vols. Eds. Bruce Smith and Katherine Rowe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 1028-1234.
Google Scholar

Quiller-Couch, Arthur. On the Art of Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1916.
Google Scholar

Raleigh, Walter. England and the War, being sundry addresses delivered during the war and now, first collected. Essay Index Reprint Series. New York: Books for Libraries Press, Inc. 1918. Reprint, 1967.
Google Scholar

Richards, I. A. Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1929.
Google Scholar

Richards, I. A. Principles of Literary Criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1925.
Google Scholar

Richards, I. A. Principles of Literary Criticism. 2nd edition. London and New York: Routledge, 1940.
Google Scholar

Richards, I. A. Science and Poetry. Reprint. 1926. Haskell House Publishers, LTD. New York: New York, 1974.
Google Scholar

Russo, John Paul. I. A. Richards: His Life and Work. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1989.
Google Scholar

Sawyer, Robert. Shakespeare Between the World Wars: The Anglo-American Sphere. New York and London: Palgrave, 1999.
Google Scholar

Taylor, Michael. Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Google Scholar

Tillyard, E. M. W. The Muse Unchained: An Intimate Account of the Revolution in English Studies at Cambridge. London: Bowes & Bowes, 1958.
Google Scholar

Wilson, John Dover. What Happens in “Hamlet.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1935.
Google Scholar