English Centering Diphthong Production by Polish Learners of English

Anna Balas

doi:10.2478/v10015-009-0009-2

Authors

Anna Balas Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-009-0009-2

Keywords:

centering diphthong, Polish, British English, Natural Phonology

Abstract

The paper shows how British English centering diphthongs are adapted to the vowel space of Polish learners of English. The goal is to focus on complex vowels and the interaction of qualitative and quantitative features. Acoustic analysis revealed various processes used to overcome pronunciation difficulties: /j/ and /w/ breaking, /r/ insertion, substitutions of other vocalic qualities, changes in diphthong duration and diphthong phases duration, and changes in the rate of frequency change.

References

Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 1992-2008. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Computer program. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
Google Scholar

Bogacka [Balas], A. 2004. On the perception of English high vowels by Polish learners of English. In E. Daskalaki, N. Katsos, M. Mavrogiorgos, and M. Reeve (eds.), CamLing 2004: Proceedings of the University of Cambridge Second Postgraduate Conference in Language Research. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Language Research. 43-50.
Google Scholar

Bogacka [Balas], A., G. Schwartz, M. Połczyńska-Fiszer, P. Zydorowicz, and P. Orzechowska 2005. The production and perception of schwa in second language acquisition: The case of Polish learners of English. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (ed.) IFAtuation: A Life in IFA. A Festschrift for Professor Fisiak on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, pp. 71–84. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Google Scholar

Cruttenden, A. 2001. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English (6 ed.). London: Arnold.
Google Scholar

Donegan, P. 1985. On the Natural Phonology of Vowels. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Google Scholar

Donegan, P. 1993. On the phonetic basis of phonological change. In C. Jones (ed.) Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives. London: Longman. 98-130.
Google Scholar

Donegan, P. 2001. Constraints and processes in phonological perception. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (ed.) Constraints and Preferences. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 42-68.
Google Scholar

Donegan, P. and D. Stampe. 1979. The Study of Natural Phonology. In D. A. Dinnsen (ed.) Current Approaches to phonological Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 126-173.
Google Scholar

Dressler, W. U. 1984. Explaining Natural Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1. 29-50.
Google Scholar

Dressler, W. U. 1985. Morphonology: the Dynamics of Derivation. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.
Google Scholar

Dressler, W. U. 1996. Principles of naturalness in phonology and across components. In B. Hurch and R. Rhodes (eds.) Natural Phonology: The state of the art,. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 41–52.
Google Scholar

Dressler, W. U. 1999. On a semiotic theory of preferences in language. In M. Jaley and M. Shapiro (eds.) The Peirce Seminar Papers. Essays in Semiotic Analysis. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Language and Peircean Sign Theory, 1997, vol. 4. New York: Berghahn Books. 389-415.
Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 1990. A Theory of Second Language Acquisition within the Framework of Natural Phonology. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 1995. Phonology Without the Syllable. A Study in the Natural Framework. Poznań: Motivex.
Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 2001. Phonotactic constraints are preferences. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (ed.) Constraints and Preferences. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 69-100.
Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 2002a. Beats-and-Binding Phonology. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 2002b Challenges for Natural Linguistics in the twenty first century: A personal view. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk and J. Weckwerth (eds.) Future Challenges for Natural Linguistics. Munich: Lincom. 103-128.
Google Scholar

Gibbon, D., I. Mertins, and R. Moore. 2000. Handbook of Multimodal and Spoken Dialogue Systems: Resources, Terminology and Product Evaluation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Google Scholar

Gibbon, D., R. Moore, and R. Winski (eds.). 1997. Handbook of Standards and Resources for Spoken Language Systems. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Klatt, D. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59, 1208–1221.
Google Scholar

Lehiste, I. and G. E. Peterson. 1961. Transitions, glides and diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33, 268–277.
Google Scholar

Liljencrants, J. and B. Lindblom. 1972. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language 48, 839–862.
Google Scholar

MacCarthy, P. 1978. The Teaching of Pronunciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Majewski, W. and H. Hollien. 1967. Formant frequency regions of Polish vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 42, 1031–1037.
Google Scholar

Polivanov, E. 1931. La perception des sons d’une langue étrangère. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 4, 79–96.
Google Scholar

Ritt, N. 2001. Are optimality theoretical “constrains” the same as natural linguistic “preferences”? In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (ed.) Constraints and Preferences. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 291-310.
Google Scholar

Roach, P., J. Hartman, and J. Setter (eds.). 2006. Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Selinker, L. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10, 209–231.
Google Scholar

Sobkowiak, W. 2004. English Phonetics for Poles (3 ed.). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.
Google Scholar

Stampe, D. 1969. The acquisition of phonetic representation. CLS 5: 443-453.
Google Scholar

Stampe, D. 1979. A Dissertation on Natural Phonology. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Google Scholar

Stampe, D. 1984. On phonological representations. Phonologica: 287–300.
Google Scholar

Stevens, K., J. Keyser, and H. Kawasaki. 1986. Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features. In J. Perkell and D. Klatt (eds.) Invariance and variability in speech processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 426–449
Google Scholar

Stevens, K. N. 1989. On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics 17, 3–46.
Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1939/1969. Principles of Phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Turk, A., S. Nakai, and M. Sugahara. 2006. Acoustic segment durations in prosodic research: A practical guide. In S. Sudhoff, D. Lenertová, R. Meyer, S. Pappert, P. Augurzky, I. Mleinek, N. Richter, and J. Schließer (eds.) Methods in Empirical Prosody Research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1–28.
Google Scholar

Upton, C., W. K. Jr, and R. Konopka (eds.). 2003. The Oxford Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. 1997. Sampa computer readable phonetic alphabet. In D. Gib-bon, R. Moore, and R. Winski (eds.) Handbook for Standards and Resources for Spoken Language Systems. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Part IV, Section B.
Google Scholar