Craving for poetry: 18th-century poets’ views on the uncontrollable desire to write poetry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-9681.11.05Keywords:
literary culture, dilettantism, graphomania, image of the author, causa scribendiAbstract
The penchant for writing poetry became a prominent discussion topic among Russian poets at the very beginning of the 18th century. While poets would usually exonerate themselves of their own “wretched inclination” to versify profusely, they would ridicule and judge similar proclivities shown by fellow poets: as Feofan Prokopovich put it, Omnes ad nauseam versificari occeperant (“everyone was composing verses in the most annoying way”). This kind of criticism was not unfounded: prolific writing led to a deterioration in style, loss of literary craft, dilettantism, and an overall decline in the prestige of the profession. Another consequence was the rise of graphomania that was likewise found reprehensible in literary polemics. Using many case studies, the author of the paper argues that these debates were closely tied to the formation of the literary culture of Modern Times, to changes in daily literary life and to the development of the image of a writer which for the most part would remain unchanged until the present.
Downloads
References
Epistolae illustrissimi ac reverendissimi Theophanis Prokopowicz variis temporibus et ad varios amicos datae nunc primum in usum corpus collectae et suo ordine digestae. [Mosquae]: Typis Universitatis Caesareae Mosquensis, 1776.
Google Scholar
Kantemir, Antiokh. Sobranie stikhotvorenii. Leningrad: Sovetskii pisatel, 1956.
Google Scholar
Levshin, Vasilii. Russkie skazki. Moskva, 1780: 4.
Google Scholar
Mazur, Natalya. Maska neistovogo stikhotvortsa v “Evgenii Onegine”: polemicheskie funktsii. In: Pushkin i ego sovremenniki: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov, No. 5 (44). Sankt-Peterburg, 2009: 14–208.
Google Scholar
Ni to, ni sio (1769), list 20, 11 iyulya.
Google Scholar
Panchenko, Aleksandr. O smene pisatelskogo tipa v petrovskuyu epokhu. In: Problemy literaturnogo razvitiya v Rossii pervoi treti XVIII veka. Leningrad: Nauka, 1974: 112–128.
Google Scholar
Pisma russkikh pisatelei XVIII v. Leningrad: Nauka, 1980.
Google Scholar
Poety-satiriki kontsa XVIII – nachala XIX v. Leningrad: Sovetskii pisatel, 1959.
Google Scholar
Pushkin, Aleksandr. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 10-ti tomakh. Leningrad: Nauka, 1978: 6.
Google Scholar
Rimskaya satira. Per. s lat. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1989.
Google Scholar
Satiricheskie zhurnaly N. I. Novikova. Moskva–Leningrad, 1951.
Google Scholar
Simeon, Polockij. Vertograd mnogocvĕtnyj, Vol. 3: “Prav nikto že” – “Epitafion” Simeonu, ed. Anthony Hippisley and Lydia I. Sazonova. Köln; Weimar; Wien: Böhlau Verlag, 2000.
Google Scholar
Steblin-Kamenskii, Ivan. Trudy po filologii. Sankt-Peterburg: Filologicheskii fakultet Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2003.
Google Scholar
Stikhotvornaya komediya, komediya, komicheskaya opera, vodevil kontsa XVIII – nachala XIX veka. Leningrad: Sovetskii pisatel, 1990: 1.
Google Scholar
Sumarokov, Aleksandr. Polnoe sobranie vsekh sochinenii. Moskva, 1787: 9.
Google Scholar
Titov, Andrei. Letopis Dvinskaya. Moskva, 1889.
Google Scholar
Trediakovskii, Vasilii. Pismo k priyatelyu o nyneshnei polze grazhdanstvu ot poezii. In: Sochineniya. Sankt-Peterburg, 1849: 1.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Rossica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.