Does China’s Aid in Africa Affect Traditional Donors?

Kassaye Deyassa

doi:10.18778/1641-4233.23.13

Authors

Kassaye Deyassa University of Bergen, Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities Global Development, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1641-4233.23.13

Keywords:

Africa, China, OECD-DAC, South-South cooperation

Abstract

China’s role as an emerging aid provider and the concept of a social plan in Africa has led to polarised responses in the West. Several say that this “productivist” strategy is much less determined by the concepts of citizenship, legal, social rights, and much more regarding building functions. The purpose of this study is to examine whether the welfare and social policy ideas that characterize Chinese aid in Africa are influencing traditional donors and becoming global. The article utilised a qualitative study that has two main components. First, a comprehensive content analysis of over 50 key Sino-African, Chinese and Western policy documents from 2000 (since cooperation between Beijing and African countries first became institutionalised). Second, there were semi-structured interviews with Chinese, African and Western stakeholders in Addis Ababa, (Ethiopia), who was directly involved in the relationship between China and Africa and related development issues. The result of documentation and interview analyses show that there are currently significant differences between Chinese and Western approaches. China has made much stronger and more explicit links between development aid and economic activity than most Western donors. The aid is usually implemented through specific projects rather than broader programs or policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kassaye Deyassa, University of Bergen, Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities Global Development, Norway

Kassaye Deyassa is studying Global Development at the University of Bergen and working as a consultant at Hordaland County. He has MSc in Environmental and Energy Management from the University of Twente, The Netherlands.

References

Alexia Delclaux Gaytán de Ayala. Just give money to the poor. The Development Revolution from the Global South. “Comillas Journal of International Relations”, no. (2), (1 February 2015), Issue 2.
Google Scholar

Ahmad, M. Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest: Concepts, Policies, and Politics. “Development in Practice”, no. 23(1) (2013), pp. 151–152.
Google Scholar

Anon. China in Africa: why the West is worried. “New African”, no. (471) (2008), p. 12.
Google Scholar

Anon. China issues white paper on foreign aid. “Xinhua Economic News”, (April 21, 2011).
Google Scholar

Anon. Constructing National Interests. In Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press, 1999, p. 97.
Google Scholar

Anon. From ‘safety nets’ back to ‘universal social provision’: is the global tide turning? [in:] The global social policy reader. Bristol, UK; Chicago, IL, USA: Policy Press, 2009, p. 371.
Google Scholar

Anon. Global Social Policy & Governance. “Reference and Research Book News”, vol. 22(3), no. 22(3) (Aug, 2007).
Google Scholar

Anon. Rogue to vogue? Aid. “The Economist”, no. 425(9062) (2017), p. 38.
Google Scholar

Asche, H. China Returns to Africa: A Rising Power and a Continent Embrace. “The Journal of African History”, no. 50(3) (2009), pp. 461–462.
Google Scholar

Darrow, M. The Millennium Development Goals: Milestones or Millstones? Human Rights Priorities for the Post-2015 Development Agenda”. “Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal”, vol. 15 (2012), p. 55.
Google Scholar

Dreher, A., Fuchs, A. and Nunnenkamp, P. New Donors. “International Interactions”, no. 39(3) (2013), pp. 402–415.
Google Scholar

Duncan, G. After Neo-Liberalism, What Could Be Worse? “New Zealand Sociology”, no. 29(1) (2014), pp. 15–39.
Google Scholar

Du Plessis, A. The Forum on China–Africa Cooperation, Ideas and Aid: National Interest(s) or Strategic Partnership? “Insight on Africa”, no. 6(2) (2014), pp. 113–130.
Google Scholar

Economy EC. The game changer. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 89(6) (2010), pp. 142–52.
Google Scholar

Emery, T. Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia: Productivist Models of Social Policy, eds. Mason M.S. Kim. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. ISBN 978‐1‐137‐47184‐0; £60 (hbk). “Social Policy & Administration”, no. 52(3) (2018), pp. 831–832.
Google Scholar

Foli, R. “Understanding Global Social Policy”, no. 45(4) (2016), pp. 765–766.
Google Scholar

Golley, J. The Dragon’s Gift: The Real Story of China in Africa. “Economic Record”, no. 87(278) (2011), pp. 501–502.
Google Scholar

Goodman, R., White, G. and Kwŏn, H.-J. The East Asian welfare model: welfare Orientalism and the state. London: Routledge, 1998.
Google Scholar

Gumede, V. Social policy for inclusive development in Africa. “Third World Quarterly”, no. 39(1) (2018), pp. 122–139.
Google Scholar

Hopf, T. The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. “International Security”, no. 23(1) (1998), pp. 171–200.
Google Scholar

Jean-Michel, S. and Ray, O. The End of ODA: Death and Rebirth of a Global Public Policy. “IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc” (2010).
Google Scholar

Kjollesdal, Kristian and Welle-Strand, Anne. Foreign aid strategies: China taking over? (Report). “Asian Social Science”, no. 6(10) (2010), pp. 3–13.
Google Scholar

Knight, B. China as a Developmental State. “World Economy”, no. 37(10) (2014), pp. 1335–1347.
Google Scholar

Lacayo, C. Comparative Analysis about the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Debate about the Social Protection Policy and System – The Case of the Social Protection Net Program from Nicaragua (RPS) and a Proposal about a System of Unique Register of Poverty Family Beneficiaries, 2016.
Google Scholar

Lafargue, F. China in Africa: A Limited Conquest. “China Perspectives”, no. (1) (2009), pp. 80–86.
Google Scholar

Mardell, J. Foreign Aid with Chinese Characteristics. “The Diplomat” (Aug 7, 2018).
Google Scholar

Midgley, J. Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. “Journal of Social Policy”, no. 34 (2005), pp. 311–312.
Google Scholar

Mkandawire, T. Social policy in a development context. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 2001.
Google Scholar

Mooij, J. Reclaiming Social Policy: Globalization, Social Exclusion and New Poverty Reduction Strategies by Arjan de Haan. “Development and Change”, no. 40(2) (2009), pp. 391–393.
Google Scholar

OECD. DAC Chair Calls on Donors to Deliver on their Gleneagles Commitments, 2006. Web.12 September 2018, http://www.oecd.org/general/dacchaircallsondonorstodeliverontheirgleneaglescommitments.htm
Google Scholar

OECD. Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Social Protection, 2009. Web. 12 September 2018, https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/iesf/document/promoting-pro-poor-growth-social-protection-oecd-2009
Google Scholar

Pempel, T.J. Global Social Policy: International Organizations and the Future of Welfare (Book Review). “The Journal of Politics”, no. 62(1) (2000), pp. 310–312.
Google Scholar

Polat, N. European integration as colonial discourse. “Review of International Studies”, no. 37(3) (2011), pp. 1255–1272.
Google Scholar

Reilly, J. A Norm-Taker or a Norm-Maker? Chinese aid in Southeast Asia. “Journal of Contemporary China”, no. 21(73) (2012), pp. 71–91.
Google Scholar

Rodrik, D. Growth versus poverty reduction: a hollow debate. ”Finance and development“ (trykt utg.) (2007), no. 37(4), pp. 8–9.
Google Scholar

Saavedra, M. The New Sinosphere: China in Africa. “The China Quarterly”, no. 190 (2007), pp. 478–480.
Google Scholar

Samy, Y. China’s Aid Policies in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges. “The Round Table”, no. 99(406) (2010), pp. 75–90.
Google Scholar

Schemeil, Y. et al. Bringing International Organization In: Global Institutions as Adaptive Hybrids. “Organization Studies”, no. 34(2) (2013), pp. 219–252.
Google Scholar

Urbina-Ferretjans, M. and Surender, R. Social Policy in the Context of New Global Actors: How Far is China’s Developmental Model in Africa Impacting Traditional Donors? “Global Social Policy”, no. 13(3) (2013), pp. 261–279.
Google Scholar

The World Health Report. Health Systems Financing: the Path to Universal Coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.
Google Scholar

Yeh, H.-J. Social Issues and Policies in Asia: Family, Ageing and Work, eds. Raymond K.H. Chan, Lih-Rong Wang and Jens O. Zinn. “International Journal of Care and Caring”, no. 2(2) (2018), pp. 297–299.
Google Scholar