To Ally or Not? The Critical Factors of a New Alliance Model in Urban Infrastructure Projects

Pekka Valkama; Lasse Oulasvirta; Ilari Karppi

doi:10.18778/1641-4233.24.05

Authors

Pekka Valkama University of Vaasa, School of Management https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-9070
Lasse Oulasvirta Tampere University, Faculty of Management and Business https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-1331
Ilari Karppi Tampere University, Faculty of Management and Business https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3371-7991

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1641-4233.24.05

Keywords:

alliance model, public-private partnership, building contract, urban infrastructure investment

Abstract

The research explains the background of an alliance model which is a new collaborative project concept in urban infrastructure investments and reviews stakeholder views of applied alliances based on a case study analysing project experiences in the city of Tampere, Finland. The alliance model is considered a potential solution for some of the chronic productivity and other problems of the building industry and the classic difficulties in public-sector investment projects, but the model fits a purpose primarily only in publicly funded, technically challenging and sufficiently large projects. The alliance model has initiation, development and implementation phases, and of these phases, the interviewed experts named the development phases as particularly critical, as team spirit, shared ethos, and joint goals must all be built in that phase before the actual collaboration between contract parties can be initiated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pekka Valkama, University of Vaasa, School of Management

Pekka Valkama – Associate Professor of social and health management, associated also with the studies of digital economy in the School of Management at the University of Vaasa, Finland. His educational qualifications include i.a. a PhD (Admin.), a Lic.Sc. (Bus. Adm.), and a M.Sc. (Admin.). The focus fields of his research publications have been innovations in public finance, organizational innovations in public services, partnerships in public service delivery systems, management accounting in local governments, competitive tendering and outsourcing of local public services, and competitive neutrality of quasi-markets of public services.

Lasse Oulasvirta, Tampere University, Faculty of Management and Business

Lasse Oulasvirta – Professor of public sector accounting at the Faculty of Business and Management, Tampere University, Finland. He holds a PhD in administrative sciences and a M.A. in business economics. His dissertation topic was local government grant financing. His research focus has been broadly on public sector and local government financing, accounting and auditing. Some of his latest publication concern local government risk management (LGS 2017) and accounting principles and standardization in the public sector (CPA 2014, JEI 2016).

Ilari Karppi, Tampere University, Faculty of Management and Business

Ilari Karppi – Adjunct Professor and university lecturer in regional studies. His key research interests focus on smart urbanity with special reference to planning of sustainable urban environments and visionary leadership in urban development/renewal processes. He is also interested in field methods for studying sensemaking in local and regional land-use and mobility planning as well as transit-oriented development.

References

Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction.” NBER Working Paper Series 3223 (1990). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved https://www.nber.org/papers/w3223
Google Scholar

Alshawi, M. Concept and Background to Public Private Partnership (PPP) / Private Finance Initiative (PFI): UK Experience. Baghdad: Iraq Institute for Economic Reforms, 2009.
Google Scholar

D’Alessandro, L., et al. “PPPs as Strategic Alliances: From Technocratic to Multidimensional Risk Governance”. Managerial Finance 40.11 (2014): 1095–1111.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2013-0165

Baumol, W. J. The Cost Disease: Why Computers Get Cheaper and Health Care Doesn’t. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
Google Scholar

Bevir, M. Key Concepts in Governance. London: Sage, 2009.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400836857

Boone, A. I., and V. I. Ivanov. “Bankruptcy Spillover Effect on Strategic Alliance Partners.” Journal of Financial Economics 103.3 (2012): 551–569.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.10.003

Carnwell, R., and A. Carson. “The Concepts of Partnership and Collaboration.” Effective Practice in Health, Social Care and Criminal Justice. Eds. R. Carnwell and J. Buchanan, Berkshire: Open University Press, 2008.
Google Scholar

City of Tampere. “Tramway.” (2017): http://www.tampere.fi/en/transport-and-streets/tramway.html
Google Scholar

Gulati, R. “Alliances and networks.” Strategic Management Journal 19.4 (1998): 293–317.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M

Huxham, C. “Theorizing Collaboration Practice.” Public Management Review 5. (2003): 401–423.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1471903032000146964

Jefferies, Marcus, et al. “Using a Case Study Approach to Identify Critical Success Factors for Alliance Contracting.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 21.5 (2014): 465–480.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2012-0007

Kiiras, J. “Toteutusmuodon valinta. Tehtävätarjotin ja toteutusmuotokorit.” (2000). Retreived https://www.rakennustieto.fi/Downloads/RK/RK010702.pdf
Google Scholar

Lahdenperä, P. “Project Alliance. The Competitive Single Target-Cost Approach.” VTT Research Notes 2472. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2009.
Google Scholar

Liikennevirasto. Lahti-Kokemäki-allianssihanke. Arvoa rahalle raportti. Helsinki: Liikennevirasto, 2015.
Google Scholar

Martin, R., et al., eds. The Art of Inequality: Architecture, Housing, and Real Estate. A provisional report. New York, NY: The Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture, Columbia University, 2015.
Google Scholar

Morelli, C. “Information Costs and Information Asymmetry in British Food Retailing.” The Service Industries Journal 19.3 (1999): 175–186.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069900000036

Palmer, N., and A. Mills. “Classical Versus Relational Approaches to Understanding Controls on a Contract with Independent GPs in South Africa.” Health Economics 12 (2003): 1005–1020.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.792

Powell, M., and C. Glendinning. “Introduction” Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare. Eds. C. Glendinning, M. Powell, and K. Rummery, Bristol: The Policy Press, 2002.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t89677

Raitiotieallianssi. Tampereen raitiotien toteutussuunnitelma. Suunnitelmaselostus osalle 1: Hervanta–keskusta–Tays. Eds. A. Haukka, E. Jokinen, and S. Yrjölä, Kaupunkiympäristön kehittäminen julkaisuja 7/2016.
Google Scholar

Rantatunneli Alliance project: Project Plan. Alliance Executive Team 26.06.2013, Tampere, 2013.
Google Scholar

Rantatunneli. Rantatunnelin allianssiurakka. Arvoa rahalle raportti. KAS vaihe. Allianssin johtoryhmä 3.04.2014.
Google Scholar

Romzek, B. S., and J. M. Johnston. “State Social Services Contracting: Exploring the Determinants of Effective Contract Accountability.” Public Administration Review 65.4 (2005): 436–449.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00470.x

Ronkainen, M. Toteutumuodon valinta kiinteistö- ja rakennushankkeissa. Diplomityö. Tuotantotalouden koulutusohjelma. University of Oulu, 2015.
Google Scholar

Savas, E. S. Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. New York: Chatham House, 2000.
Google Scholar

Valkama, P., L. Oulasvirta, and I. Karppi. “Perspectives on the Limited Emergence of Public-Private Partnerships in Finland.” Public Private Partnership: A Global Review. Eds. A. Akintoye, M. Beck, and M. Kumaraswamy. Oxon: Routledge, 2016.
Google Scholar

Vangen, S., et al. “Governing Cross-Sector, Inter-Organizational Collaborations.” Public Management Review 17.9 (2015): 1237–1260.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.903658

Vangen, S., and Ch. Huxham. “Enacting Leadership for Collaborative Advantage: Dilemmas of Ideology and Pragmatism in the Activities of Partnership Managers.” British Journal of Management 14.s1 (2003): 61–76.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00393.x

Veenswijk, M. “Cultural Change in the Public Sector: Innovating the Frontstage and Backstage.” Organising Innovation: New Approaches to Cultural Change and Intervention in Public Sector Organisations. Ed. M. Veenswijk. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2006.
Google Scholar

Vincent-Jones, P. “Contractual Governance: A Social Learning Perspective.” Organizational Innovation in Public Services: Forms and Governance. Eds. P. Valkama, S. J. Bailey, and A.-V. Anttiroiko, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Google Scholar

Virtanen, E. “Valtion rahoittaman rakentamisen ongelmat.” Valtioneuvoston kanslian julkaisusarja 10 (2017): http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-287-388-0
Google Scholar

Walker, D. H. T., and M. Jacobsson. “A Rationale for Alliancing Within a Public-Private Partnerships. “Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 21.6 (2014): 648–673.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2013-0087

Zysman, J., et al. “The New Challenge to Economic Governance: The Digital Transformation of Services.” Innovations in Public Governance. Eds. A.-V. Anttiroiko, S. Bailey, and P. Valkama, Amsterdam, IOS Press, 2011.
Google Scholar