Heterogeneity of the Notion of Interest in Accordance with the International Relations Theory: A Study of Russia’s National Interests

Authors

  • Jarosław Sadłocha University of Wroclaw, Institute of International Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1641-4233.23.15

Keywords:

national interest, theory of international relations, Russia’s foreign policy, the annexation of the Crimea

Abstract

The category of a national interest is one of the most popular notions used in international relations. It has a polysemic character and is differently interpreted by various scientific perspectives. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief analysis of selected approaches of the theory of international relations to defining interests and correlating the interpretations of national interests of the Russian Federation performed on their bases. The choice of case study concerning the foreign policy of the Russian Federation is not accidental because in countries aspiring to gain world power the concept of national interest is raised while explaining the motives of decisions taken by their leaders exceptionally often. In this article, Russia’s interests will be discussed in reference to the annexation of the Crimea and Russia’s actions towards Ukraine. Those events vividly show the specificity of defining the national interests, based on one hand on the pursue to being a powerhouse and understanding the interests in the category of power and, on the other hand, resulting from the political identity of Russian elites. As a result, an assessment of the scientific utility of selected theoretical paradigms and their use in the analyses of Russia’s foreign policy will be outlined.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jarosław Sadłocha, University of Wroclaw, Institute of International Studies

Jarosław Sadłocha – a PhD in social sciences, graduate of the University of Wroclaw. Author of the publication Critical Analysis of the Category of Interest in the Theory of International Relations and co-author of The Nobel Prize as a Symbol of Global Norms and Social Ideas. Scientific interests: theory of international relations, national security, category of interest.

References

Arbatov, A. Pochemu my ne ponimaem drug druga?”. “Voenno-promyshlenny Kurier”, no. 28(344), 2010.
Google Scholar

Areshev, A. DOVSE. Ustarevshii Dogovor i Novye Realii. “Mezhdunarodnaia Zhizn”, no. 12, 2007.
Google Scholar

Baker, P. Pressure Rising as Obama Works to Rein In Russia. “The New York Times”, 2.03.2014.
Google Scholar

Beom, S.S. Russia‘s Perspectives on International Politics: A Comparison of Liberalist, Realist and Geopolitical Paradigms. “Acta Slavica Iaponica”, no. (26), 2007.
Google Scholar

Bogaturov, A. Kontrrevolutsiia tsennostei i mezhdunarodnaia bezopasnost. “Mezhdunarodnyie Protsessy”, no. 8(324), 2010.
Google Scholar

Bordachev, T. The limits of rational choice Russia in Global Affairs, 4 October 2008.
Google Scholar

Burchill, S. The National Interest in International Relations Theory. London, 2005.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230005778

Carr, E.H., The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939. New York: Perennial, 2001.
Google Scholar

Chazbijewicz S. Adwet czyli powrót. Walka polityczna Tatarów krymskich o zachowanie tożsamości narodowej i niepodległość państwa po II wojnie Światowej.Olsztyn, 2001.
Google Scholar

Clunan, A. The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity, and Security Interests. Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.
Google Scholar

Cox, R. Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. “Millennium: Journal of International Studies”, no. 10, 1981.
Google Scholar

Donnelly, J. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612510

Finnemore, M. National Interests in International Society. New York, 1996.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501707384

Gilpin, R. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664267

Gostkiewicz, M. Dwa obozy, które mówią różnymi językami. Jak Rosja i Zachód bawią się w propagandowy głuchy telefon. „Gazeta Wyborcza”, 28 March 2014.
Google Scholar

Hall, R.B. Moral Authority as a Power Resource. “International Organization”, no. 51(4), 1997.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550465

Hamilton, College Levitt Poll. The Russian Elite 2016. Web. https://www.hamilton.edu/documents/russian%20elite%202016%20final%20ppt.pdf
Google Scholar

Hopf, T. Crimea is ours: A discursive history. “International Relations”, no. 30(2), 2016.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117816645646

Hopf, T. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities & Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. London: Cornell University Press, 2002.
Google Scholar

Jusufaj, E. The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea. “ILIRIA International Review”, 01, 2015.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.21113/iir.v5i1.20

Kapuśniak, T. Ukraina jako obszar wpływów międzynarodowych po zimnej wojnie, Warsaw, 2008.
Google Scholar

Karaganov, S. Lucky Russia. Russia in global affairs. 23 March 2011. Web. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/pubcol/Lucky-Russia-15154
Google Scholar

Kelly, L., Carbonnel Alissa de. Russian markets plunge as Putin tightens Crimea grip. Web. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/03/us-ukraine-crisis-idUSBREA1Q1E82014030
Google Scholar

Keohane, R.O. Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence. New York, 2001
Google Scholar

Kropatcheva, E. Russian Foreign Policy in the Realm of European Security through the Lens of Neoclassical Realism. “Journal of Eurasian Studies”, no. 3, 2012.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2011.10.004

Levada Center Poll. Russia’s role in the world. Web. 25 March 2015, https://www.levada.ru/en/2015/03/25/russia-s-role-in-the-world
Google Scholar

Levada Center Poll. Sankcii: ocenki i ożydanija. Web. 28 August 2014, http:levada.ru/2014/08/28/sanktsii-otsenki-i-ozhidaniya/
Google Scholar

Lobell, S.E., Ripsman, N.M, Taliaferro, J.W. (eds.). Neoclassical realism, the State, and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811869

Makarychev, A. Russia, Ukraine and the Eastern Partnership: From Common Neighborhood to Spheres of Influence? “Insight Turkey”, no. 16(3), 2014. Web. http://file.insightturkey.com/Files/Pdf/russia-ukraine.pdf
Google Scholar

Moravscik, A. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. “International Organization”, vol. 51, no. 4, 1997.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447

Morgenthau, H.J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf, 1985.
Google Scholar

Murray, R. The Return of the Problem-Solvers. Web. http: e-ir.info/2014/03/19/the-return-of-the-problem-solvers/
Google Scholar

Primakov, Y. Rossiya ishchet novoe mesto v mire. “Izvestiya”, 6 March 1996.
Google Scholar

Putin, V. Address by President of the Russian Federation. 18.03.2014. Web. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603
Google Scholar

Putin, V. Putin deplores collapse of USSR. “BBC News”. Web. 25. April 2005, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4480745.stm
Google Scholar

Putin, V. Reception to Mark 1000 Years since the Death of St. Vladimir, Equal-to-the-Apostles. Web. 28 July 2015, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50068
Google Scholar

Putin, V. Vladimir Putin has been Sworn in as President of Russia. Web. 7 May 2018, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/57416
Google Scholar

Ruggie, J.G. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London, 1998.
Google Scholar

Russian National Security Strategy. Web. December 2015, http://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/OtrasPublicaciones/Internacional/2016/Russian-National-Security-Strategy-31Dec2015.pdf
Google Scholar

Sadłocha, J. Krytyczna analiza kategorii interesu w teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Wrocław, 2015.
Google Scholar

Schweller, R.L., Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. New York, 1998.
Google Scholar

Shea, A. Ukraine: Putin’s postmodern moment and the politics of truth. Web. 11 March 2014, http://conflictandsecurity.com/blog/ukraine-putins-postmodern-moment-and-the-politics-of-truth
Google Scholar

Singer, J.D., The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations, [in:] K. Knorr and S. Verba (eds.)., The International System: Theoretical Essays. New York, 1961.
Google Scholar

Slobodchikoff, M.O., Douglas Davis, G. Roots of Russian Soft Power: Rethinking Russian National Identity. “Comparative Politics Russia”, no. 2, 2017.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-19-36

Strategiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda. Web. 12 May 2009, http://www.kremlin.ru/supplement/424
Google Scholar

Tsygankov, A. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.
Google Scholar

Tsygankov, A. Russia’s Power and Alliances in the 21st century. “Politics”, no. 30(4), 2010.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01392.x

Vasquez, J. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Google Scholar

Waltz, K. Struktura teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Warsaw: Scholar, 2010.
Google Scholar

Weldes, J. Constructing National Interests: the United States and the Cuban missile crisis. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
Google Scholar

Wendt, A. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. “International Organization”, vol. 46, no. 2, 1992.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764

Wendt, A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183

Wielomski, A. Putinowska inna rzeczywistość. Web. http://www.konserwatyzm.pl/artykul/11851/putinowska-inna-rzeczywistosc
Google Scholar

Wierzbowska-Miazga, A. Konsekwencje aneksji Krymu. Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich, Web. 19 March 2014, http://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/analizy/2014–03–19/konsekwencje-aneksji-krymu
Google Scholar

Williams, M. The Realist Tradition and Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491771

Wohlforth, W.C., The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the Cold War. Ithaca, 1993.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501738081

Downloads

Published

2019-07-15

How to Cite

Sadłocha, J. (2019). Heterogeneity of the Notion of Interest in Accordance with the International Relations Theory: A Study of Russia’s National Interests. International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, 23(1), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.18778/1641-4233.23.15