Confronting the International Order: Changes in US Foreign Policy from the Perspective of American Power Elites

Authors

  • Andrzej Mania Jagiellonian University, Institute of Political Science and International Relations
  • Tomasz Pugacewicz Jagiellonian University, Institute of Political Science and International Relations

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1641-4233.23.02

Keywords:

United States, international order, Donald Trump, Foreign Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations, US power elite, international relations theories, ideological rivalry, Russia, China

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present the most important voices on the role of the US in the international order during Donald Trump’s presidency in the debate held in the Foreign Affairs. The authors assume that Foreign Affairs expresses the opinions of the most crucial organisation bringing together the elites of American foreign affairs – the Council on Foreign Relations. The paper proposes a hypothesis according to which there is a difference of opinion due to the adopted theoretical perspective regarding Trump’s role in the destruction of the liberal international order among the American power elites, even though they agree that the ideological conflict between democratic and authoritarian countries around the world is escalating.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andrzej Mania, Jagiellonian University, Institute of Political Science and International Relations

Andrzej Mania - Professor title awarded by the President of Poland in 1993. Since 1997, Professor at the Institute of Political Science and International Relations and head of the Chair of Diplomatic History and International Politics. Simultaneously, since 1994, head of the Chair of American Studies. Between 2008 and 2016, Vice- Rector for Educational Affairs of the Jagiellonian University. Member of the Steering Committee of the International Research University Network (2008–2012). Chairman of the Steering Committee of the Sasakawa Young Leaders Fellowship Fund of the Tokyo Foundation at the Jagiellonian University. Fellow or visiting professor in more than ten foreign institutions, including Norwegian Nobel Institute in Oslo, Kennan Institute of Advanced Russian Studies in Washington and the University of Rochester. Authored or co-authored ten books, including The Department of State 1789–1939 (Jagiellonian University Press, Krakow 2011). Editor of another six books. Member of the Lions Club International (Krakow Stare Miasto).

Tomasz Pugacewicz, Jagiellonian University, Institute of Political Science and International Relations

Tomasz Pugacewicz - PhD, Assistant Professor at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków. The theoretical aspects of his PhD dissertation were published in the monograph Teorie polityki zagranicznej. Perspektywa amerykańskiej analizy polityki zagranicznej [Theories of Foreign Policy. American FPA Perspective] (Jagiellonian University Press, Kraków 2017). During his internships abroad, he was a visiting researcher at the Johns Hopkins University, the State University of New  York, and the Heidelberg University. In 2018, he received a grant from the Polish National Science Centre for the project titled “Between Center and Periphery: A Comparison of Ludwik Ehrlich’s Theoretical Concepts with American-British International Relations in the First Half of the Twenty Century”. Holder of several scholarships, e.g. the scholarship of the Copernicus Society in America. In 2015, he participated in the Ideas Lab – the Young Professionals Programme at the Chancellery of the President of the Republic of Poland.

References

Abelson, D. Theoretical Models and Approaches to Understanding the Role of Lobbies and Think Tanks in US Foreign Policy. Policy Expertise in Contemporary Democracies. Ed. Stephen Brooks, Dorota Stasiak, and Tomasz Zyro. Burlington: Ashgate, 2012.
Google Scholar

Abrams, E. Trump the Traditionalists. A Surprisingly Standard Foreign Policy, “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.4 (2017), pp. 10–16.
Google Scholar

Allison, G. The Myth of the Liberal Order From Historical Accident to Conventional Wisdom, “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.4 (2018), pp. 124–133.
Google Scholar

Annual Membership Dues. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/CFRMemberDues-July2017.pdf
Google Scholar

Bacevich, A.J. Saving “America First”. What Responsible Nationalism Looks Like, “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.5 (2017), pp. 57–67.
Google Scholar

Biden, J.R. Building on Success, Opportunities for the Next Administration. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 95.5 (2016), pp. 46–58.
Google Scholar

Circulation. “Foreign Affairs”. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/circulation
Google Scholar

Cohen, E.A. The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force. New York: Basic Books, 2016.
Google Scholar

Cohen, E.A. Trump’s Lucky Year. Why the Chaos Can’t Last. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.2 (2018), pp. 2–9.
Google Scholar

Colgan, J.D. and Robert O. Keohane. The Liberal Order Is Rigged. Fix it Now or Watch It Wither. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.3 (2017), pp. 36–44.
Google Scholar

Delury, J. Trump and North Korea. Reviving the Art of the Deal. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 46–51.
Google Scholar

Deudney, D. and G.J.I. Liberal World. The Resilient Order. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.4 (2018), pp. 16–24.
Google Scholar

Feigenbaum, Evan A. China and the World. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), pp. 33–40.
Google Scholar

Foreign Affairs Again Ranked Most Influential of All Media by US Opinion-Leader Study. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/news-releases/foreign-affairs-again-ranked-most-influential-all-media-us-opinion-leader-study
Google Scholar

Funding. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/who-we-are/funding
Google Scholar

Grose, P. Continuing the Inquiry: The Council on Foreign Relations from 1921 to 1996. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1996.
Google Scholar

Haass, R.N. A World in Disarray: America Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order. New York: Penguin Press, 2017b.
Google Scholar

Haass, R.N. Where to Go From Here. Rebooting American Foreign Policy. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.4 (2017c), pp. 2–9;
Google Scholar

Haass, R.N. World Order 2.0. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017a), pp. 2–9.
Google Scholar

History. “Foreign Affairs”. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/history
Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G.J. The Plot Against American Foreign Policy. Can the Liberal Order Survive. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.3 (2017), pp. 2–9.
Google Scholar

Individual Membership. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/membership/individual-membership
Google Scholar

James M. Lindsay. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/experts/james-m-lindsay
Google Scholar

Kotkin, S. Realist World. The Players Change, but the Game Remains. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.4 (2018), pp. 10–15.
Google Scholar

Kroenig, M. The Case for Trump’s Foreign Policy. The Right People, the Right Positions. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.3 (2017), pp. 30–34.
Google Scholar

Lieber, R.J. Retreat and Its Consequences: American Foreign Policy and the Problem of World Order. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316493939

Lind, J. Asia’s Other Revisionist Power. Why US Grand Strategy Unnerves China. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 74–82.
Google Scholar

List the four journals that publish articles with the greatest influence on the way IR scholars think about international relations. TRIP Faculty Survey All Countries Combined (Sep. 9, 2014). Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://trip.wm.edu/charts/#/bargraph/38/5068
Google Scholar

Mania, A. Europa Środkowa w celach polityki USA w latach I wojny światowej. 14 punktów Wilsona. Państwa europejskie na drodze do niepodległości: (w drugiej połowie XIX i XX wieku): studia ofiarowane Profesorowi Marianowi Zgórniakowi. Ed. Irena Stawowy-Kawka and Wojciech Rojek. Kraków: Historia Iagellonica, 2003.
Google Scholar

Mania, A., and Pugacewicz, T. Wybrane elementy kondycji Stanów Zjednoczonych u progu prezydentury Donalda Trumpa [Selected aspects of the United States’ condition on the threshold of Donald Trump’s presidency]. “Rocznik Strategiczny”, no. 22 (2017), pp. 247–259.
Google Scholar

Mazarr, Michael J. The Once and Future Order. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), pp. 25–32.
Google Scholar

Mazarr, Michael J. The Real History of the Liberal Order: Neither Myth Nor Accident. “Foreign Affairs” (Aug. 7, 2018). Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018–08–07/real-history-liberal-order
Google Scholar

McGann, J.G. 2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2018.
Google Scholar

McGann, J.G. Think Tanks and Policy Advice in the US. Philadelphia: Foreign Policy Research Institute, 2005.
Google Scholar

Mead, W.R. The Jacksonian Revolt. American Populism and the Liberal Order. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 2–7.
Google Scholar

Mounk, Y. and Foa, R.S. The End of the Democratic Century. Autocracy’s Global Ascendance. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.3 (2018), pp. 29–36.
Google Scholar

Niblett, R. Liberalism in Retreat. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), pp. 17–24.
Google Scholar

Nye, J.S. Will the Liberal Order Survive? “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), pp. 10–16.
Google Scholar

Parmar, I. Think tanks and power in foreign policy: a comparative study of the role and influence of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1939–1945. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000780

Patrick, S.M. Trump and World Order. The Return of Self-Help. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 52–57.
Google Scholar

Posen, B.R. The Rise of Illiberal Hegemony. Trump’s Surprising Grand Strategy. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.2 (2018), pp. 20–27.
Google Scholar

Pugacewicz, T. Teorie polityki zagranicznej. Perspektywa amerykańskiej analizy polityki zagranicznej [Theories of foreign policy: American foreign policy analysis Perspective]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2017.
Google Scholar

Richard N. Haass. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/experts/richard-n-haass
Google Scholar

Rose, G. Letting Go. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.2 (2018), p. C9.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc7734v.9

Rose, G. Out of Order. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), p. C9.
Google Scholar

Rumer, E.B. Richard Sokolsky, and Andrew S. Weiss. Trump and Russia. The Right Way to Manage Relations. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 12–19.
Google Scholar

Schake, K. Will Washington Abandon the Order? “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.1 (2017), pp. 41–46.
Google Scholar

Schulzinger, R.D. The Wise Men of Foreign Affairs: The History of the Council on Foreign Relations. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/schu94342

Shirk, S. Trump and China. Getting to Yes With Beijing. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 20–27.
Google Scholar

Shoup, L.H. Wall Street’s think tank: the Council on Foreign Relations and the empire of neoliberal geopolitics, 1976–2014. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2015.
Google Scholar

Shoup, L.H. and William Minter. Imperial brain trust: the Council on Foreign Relations and United States foreign policy. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1977.
Google Scholar

Staff. “Foreign Affairs”. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/staff#PUB
Google Scholar

Submissions. “Foreign Affairs”. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/submissions-0
Google Scholar

Sullivan, J. The World After Trump. How the System Can Endure. “Foreign Affairs”, no. 97.2 (2018), pp. 10–19.
Google Scholar

The Council on Foreign Relations: A Record of Twenty-five Years, 1921–1946. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1947.
Google Scholar

Think Tank. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/think-tank
Google Scholar

Think Tanks. New York Times (Aug. 10, 2008). Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://ideas.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/10/think-tanks/
Google Scholar

Trimbath, S. Think Tanks: Who’s Hot. “The International Economy: the Magazine of International Economic Policy” (2005), pp. 10–15, 39–47.
Google Scholar

Wala, M. Council on Foreign Relations and American foreign policy in the early Cold War. Providence: Berghahn Books, 1994.
Google Scholar

Wala, M. Winning the peace: amerikanische Außenpolitik und der Council on Foreign Relations, 1945–1950. Stuttgart: F. Steiner, 1990.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2019-07-15

How to Cite

Mania, A., & Pugacewicz, T. (2019). Confronting the International Order: Changes in US Foreign Policy from the Perspective of American Power Elites. International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, 23(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.18778/1641-4233.23.02

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 1 (2019): International Responses to President Trump’s Foreign Policy: The First Two Years

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.