Unitary and dualistic aspects of anthropology by Thomas Aquinas in relation to a human being as imago dei
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.50.02Słowa kluczowe:
Thomas Aquinas, anthropology, philosophic psychology, soul, body, form, substance, imago DeiAbstrakt
The present text deals with two layers of philosophic psychology/anthropology in the works of Thomas Aquinas and strives to examine the mutual relationships and interrelated meanings between these layers while paying particular attention to the biblical image of a human being as imago Dei. With respect to this aim, the paper contains a justification of the distinction between philosophic psychology, which understands soul as a substantial form of the human being, and dualistic philosophic psychology, which views soul as the subject of activities, or as incomplete substance. This distinction is then confirmed as confronted with the way Thomas Aquinas delimits the human being as imago Dei in his Summa Theologiae, by which means the way we understand this expression becomes more exact, and the importance of Thomas's dualistic terminology, which we encounter in his works, is emphasised at the same time.
Bibliografia
Aertsen, J. A. (2005). Aquinas and the Human Desire for Knowledge. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79, 411˗430.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq200579325
Aristotle (1987). De anima/On the soul. Penguin Classics.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (2002). Filosofie pozdní antiky. Praha: Oikúmené.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Bazán, C. B. (1983). La corporalité selon saint Thomas. Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 80, 369-409.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/phlou.1983.6253
Bazán, C. B. (1991). The Highest Encomium of Human Body. Litera, sensus, sententia, 99-116.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Bazán, C. B. (1996). Pluralisme de formes ou dualisme de substances? Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 67, 30˗73.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/phlou.1969.5476
Bazán, C. B. (1997). The Human Soul: Form and Substance? Thomas Aquinas' Critique of Eclectic Aristotelianism. Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge, 64, 95˗126.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Bieniak, B. (2010). The Soul-Body Problem at Paris, ca. 1200˗1250. Hugh of st. Scher and his Contemporaries. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qdzd9
Davidson, H. A. (1986). Averroes and the Material Intellect. Viator, 17, 91-137.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.301407
Mensching, G. (2006). Tomáš Akvinský a světlo rozumu. Studia philosophica, B53, 31˗39.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. (2004). Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521806038.010
Shin, Ch.-S. (1993). „Imago Dei“ und „Natura Hominis“. Der Doppelansatz der thomistischen Handlungslehre. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Slováček, P. (2014). Filosofické základy psychologie Tomáše Akvinského. Studie k filosofické psychologii a metafyzice vrcholného středověku. Opava: Slezská univerzita v Opavě.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Sweeney, M. J. (1999). Soul as Substance and Method in Thomas Aquinas´ Anthropological Writings. Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge, 66, 43˗87.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Tomarchio, J. (1998). Four indices for the Thomistic principle quod recipitur in aliquo est in eo per modum recipientis. Mediaeval Studies, 60, 315˗368.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.MS.2.306684
Tomarchio, J. (2000-2001). Aquinas´s Division of Being According to Modes of Existing. The Review of Metaphysics, 54, 585˗613.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Verbeke, G. (1977). Introduction Doctrinale. In: S. Van Riet (ed.), Avicenna Latinus, Liber de Philosophia Prima sive Scientia Divina I-IV. Leiden.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004451261
Wippel, J. F. (1984). Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. (1988). Thomas Aquinas and the Axiom “What is received is received according to the mode of the receiver. In: Salinger, R. L. (ed.), Straight Path (279˗289). Washington: Catholic University of America.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Zavalloni, R. (1951). Richard de Mediavilla et la controverse sur la pluralité des formes. Louvain.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.