Unitary and dualistic aspects of anthropology by Thomas Aquinas in relation to a human being as imago dei

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.50.02

Keywords:

Thomas Aquinas, anthropology, philosophic psychology, soul, body, form, substance, imago Dei

Abstract

The present text deals with two layers of philosophic psychology/anthropology in the works of Thomas Aquinas and strives to examine the mutual relationships and interrelated meanings between these layers while paying particular attention to the biblical image of a human being as imago Dei. With respect to this aim, the paper contains a justification of the distinction between philosophic psychology, which understands soul as a substantial form of the human being, and dualistic philosophic psychology, which views soul as the subject of activities, or as incomplete substance. This distinction is then confirmed as confronted with the way Thomas Aquinas delimits the human being as imago Dei in his Summa Theologiae, by which means the way we understand this expression becomes more exact, and the importance of Thomas's dualistic terminology, which we encounter in his works, is emphasised at the same time.

References

Aertsen, J. A. (2005). Aquinas and the Human Desire for Knowledge. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79, 411˗430.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq200579325

Aristotle (1987). De anima/On the soul. Penguin Classics.
View in Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (2002). Filosofie pozdní antiky. Praha: Oikúmené.
View in Google Scholar

Bazán, C. B. (1983). La corporalité selon saint Thomas. Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 80, 369-409.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/phlou.1983.6253

Bazán, C. B. (1991). The Highest Encomium of Human Body. Litera, sensus, sententia, 99-116.
View in Google Scholar

Bazán, C. B. (1996). Pluralisme de formes ou dualisme de substances? Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 67, 30˗73.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/phlou.1969.5476

Bazán, C. B. (1997). The Human Soul: Form and Substance? Thomas Aquinas' Critique of Eclectic Aristotelianism. Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge, 64, 95˗126.
View in Google Scholar

Bieniak, B. (2010). The Soul-Body Problem at Paris, ca. 1200˗1250. Hugh of st. Scher and his Contemporaries. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qdzd9

Davidson, H. A. (1986). Averroes and the Material Intellect. Viator, 17, 91-137.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.301407

Mensching, G. (2006). Tomáš Akvinský a světlo rozumu. Studia philosophica, B53, 31˗39.
View in Google Scholar

Pasnau, R. (2004). Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521806038.010

Shin, Ch.-S. (1993). „Imago Dei“ und „Natura Hominis“. Der Doppelansatz der thomistischen Handlungslehre. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
View in Google Scholar

Slováček, P. (2014). Filosofické základy psychologie Tomáše Akvinského. Studie k filosofické psychologii a metafyzice vrcholného středověku. Opava: Slezská univerzita v Opavě.
View in Google Scholar

Sweeney, M. J. (1999). Soul as Substance and Method in Thomas Aquinas´ Anthropological Writings. Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge, 66, 43˗87.
View in Google Scholar

Tomarchio, J. (1998). Four indices for the Thomistic principle quod recipitur in aliquo est in eo per modum recipientis. Mediaeval Studies, 60, 315˗368.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.MS.2.306684

Tomarchio, J. (2000-2001). Aquinas´s Division of Being According to Modes of Existing. The Review of Metaphysics, 54, 585˗613.
View in Google Scholar

Verbeke, G. (1977). Introduction Doctrinale. In: S. Van Riet (ed.), Avicenna Latinus, Liber de Philosophia Prima sive Scientia Divina I-IV. Leiden.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004451261

Wippel, J. F. (1984). Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.
View in Google Scholar

Wippel, J. F. (1988). Thomas Aquinas and the Axiom “What is received is received according to the mode of the receiver. In: Salinger, R. L. (ed.), Straight Path (279˗289). Washington: Catholic University of America.
View in Google Scholar

Zavalloni, R. (1951). Richard de Mediavilla et la controverse sur la pluralité des formes. Louvain.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Slováček, P. (2020). Unitary and dualistic aspects of anthropology by Thomas Aquinas in relation to a human being as imago dei. Hybris, 50(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.50.02

Issue

Section

Articles