The Influence of Generation X and Y Employees on Modern Cities

Aygun Kam; Justyna Trippner‑Hrabi

doi:10.18778/0208-6018.352.03

Autor

Aygun Kam University of Łódź, Doctoral School of Social Science, Economy and Finance, Łódź, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5187-6035
Justyna Trippner‑Hrabi University of Łódź, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Local Government Economics, Łódź, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3241-1122

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.352.03

Słowa kluczowe:

miasta, miejska siła robocza, kultura organizacyjna, tożsamość organizacyjna, pokolenie X, pokolenie Y

Abstrakt

Profil pracowników w świecie biznesu staje się coraz bardziej zróżnicowany. Ta heterogeniczność pokazuje, że rozwarstwiła się również struktura ludności czynnej zawodowo w miastach. Głównym celem artykułu jest zbadanie znaczenia wpływu cech pracowników z pokoleń X i Y na pracę zawodową i życie miejskie. Badanie zostało przeprowadzone wśród 235 pracowników umysłowych zatrudnionych w firmach usługowych, handlowych i marketingowych w sektorze prywatnym w Stambule. Dane uzyskano w trakcie badania ilościowego przeprowadzonego za pomocą kwestionariusza wywiadu techniką CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview). Według literatury wejście członków różnych pokoleń w życie biznesowe oznacza różne perspektywy i oczekiwania wobec organizacji i miast, w których pracują. Nasze badania pokazują jednak, że poszczególne pokolenia mają różne cechy i oczekiwania tylko w teorii i nie jest to poparte wnioskami wypływającymi z empirii.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Allam Z., Newman P. (2018), Redefining the Smart City: Culture, Metabolism and Governance, Smart Cities, “Smart Cities”, vol. 1(1), pp. 4–25.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities1010002

Anholt S. (2007), What is competitive identity?, [in:] S. Anholt, Competitive identity, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 1–23.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627727_1

Anholt S. (2013), Beyond the Nation Brand: The Role of Image and Identity in International Relations, “Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy”, vol. 2, issue 1, article 1.
Google Scholar

Ashforth B. E., Mael F. (1989), Social Identity Theory and The Organization, “Academy of Management Review”, vol. 14(1), pp. 20–39.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999

Aydıntan B. (2005), Cultural Diversity and Its Effects in Multinational Business, [in:] O. A. Seymen, T. Bolat (eds.), Globalization and Multinational Business, Nobel Publishing, Ankara, pp. 153–178.
Google Scholar

Baran M. (2014), Analysis of Generation Y’s Expectations from Compulsory Military Service, Military Academy Institute of Strategic Research Defense Resources Management Department Master Thesis, Istanbul. Bolat O. İ. (2011), Self‑Sufficiency and Fatigue Relationship: The Mediating Effect of Leader‑Member Interaction, “Journal of Ege Akademik Bakış”, vol. 11(2), pp. 255–266.
Google Scholar

Brown M. E. (1969), Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement, “Administrative Science Quarterly”, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 346–355.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2391129

Cameron K. S., Quinn R. E. (2006), Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on The Cmpeting Values Framework, John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco.
Google Scholar

Cameron K. S., Freeman S. J., Mishra A. K. (1991), Best practices in white‑collar downsizing: Managing contradictions, “Academy of Management Perspectives”, vol. 5(3), pp. 57–73.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274469

Ceylan A. (2014), The ideal leadership perception of X and Y generation teachers: An empirical research among the primary schools of Fatih district, Unpublished master’s thesis, Haliç University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul. Cheney G. (1983), On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification, “Communications Monographs”, vol. 50(4), pp. 342–362.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758309390174

Coelho J., Cacho N., Lopes F., Loiola E., Tayrony T., Andrade T., Moura B. (2016), ROTA: A smart city platform to improve public safety, [in:] Á. Rocha, A. M. Correia, H. Adeli, L. P. Reis, M. Mendonça Teixeira (eds.), New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies, vol. 1, Springer, Cham, pp. 787–796.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31232-3_74

Daloğlu E. S. (2013), An Intergenerational Analysis on Perception of Working, Yaşar University, Institute of Social Sciences, Master of Business Administration, Izmir.
Google Scholar

Delahoyde T. (2009), Generational Differences of Baccalaureate Nursing Students’ Preferred Teaching Methods and Faculty Use of Teaching Methods, PhD Thesis, College of Saint Mary, Omaha.
Google Scholar

Deshpandé R., Farley J. U., Webster Jr. F. E. (1993), Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis, “Journal of Marketing”, vol. 57(1), pp. 23–37.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700102

Doğan B. (2007), Organization culture, Beta Publishing, Istanbul. Dustmann C., Schönberg U., Stuhler J. (2016), Labor Supply Shocks, Native Wages, and the Adjustment of Local Employment, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 10114, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.
Google Scholar

El‑Kassar A., Singh S. (2019), Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 144, pp. 483–498.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016

Foote N. N. (1951), Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation, “American Sociological Review”, vol. 16(1), pp. 14–21.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2087964

Ge J., Su X., Zhou Y. (2010), Organizational Socialization, Organizational Identification and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: An Empirical Research of Chinese High‑Tech Manufacturing Enterprises, “Nankai Business Review International”, vol. 1(2), pp. 166–179.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/20408741011052573

Gürbüz S. (2015), Generational Differences: Myth or Reality, “Journal of İşveİnsan”, vol. 2(1), pp. 39–57.
Google Scholar

Hall D. T. (1971), A theoretical model of career subidentity development in organizational settings, “Organizational Behavior and Human Performance”, vol. 6(1), pp. 50–76.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(71)90005-5

Hammil G. (2005), Mixing and managing four generation of employees, “FDU Magazıne Online Journal”, Winter/Spring.
Google Scholar

Jurkiewicz C. L., Brown R. G. (1998), Generational Comparisons of Public Employee Motivation, “Review of Public Personnel Administration”, vol. 18(4), pp. 18–37.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9801800403

Kam A. (2019), The Influence of X and Y Belonging Characters on The Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Organizational Identification, Master’s thesis, Balıkesir University Institute of Social, Balıkesir.
Google Scholar

Kandır A., Alpan U. Y. (2008), The Effect of Parenting Behaviors on Social Emotional Development in Preschool Period, “Journal of Social Policy Studies”, vol. 14(14), pp. 33–38.
Google Scholar

Karabey C. N., İşcan Ö. F. (2007), The Relationship of Organizational Identification, Organizational Image and Organizational Image and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Application, “Atatürk University Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences”, vol. 21(2), pp. 231–241.
Google Scholar

Kelman H. C. (1958), Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change, “Journal of Conflict Resolution”, vol. 2(1), pp. 51–60.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106

Kianto A., Saenz J., Aramburu N. (2017), Knowledge based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 81, pp. 11–20.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.018

Korkmaz O., Aydemir S., Uysal H. T. (2017), The Impact of the Dominant Institutional Culture on Organizational Identification, “Journal of Balkan Social Sciences”, vol. 6(12), pp. 62–81.
Google Scholar

Köse C. G. (2009), Contribution of Organizational Identification to Continuous Improvement Efforts of Employees: A Study, Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul. Kupperschmidt B. R. (2000), Multigeneration employees: strategies for effective management, “The Health Care Manager”, vol. 19(1), pp. 65–76.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00126450-200019010-00011

Kurt C. (2019), The effect of implicit leadership on the relationship between leadership perceptions and intention to quit the managers of X and Y generations, Master’s thesis, Balıkesir University Institute of Social Sciences, Balıkesir.
Google Scholar

Lacinák R. (2017), Smart city, Safety and Security, “Procedia Engineering”, vol. 192, pp. 522–527.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.090

Lamm E., Meeks M. D. (2009), Workplace fun: the moderating effects of generational differences, “Employee Relations Journal”, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 613–632.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450910991767

Mael F., Ashforth B. E. (1992), Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification, “Journal of Organizational Behavior”, vol. 13(2), pp. 103–123.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202

Marchina I., Drogomyretska M. (2014), The role of branding in the sustainable development of tourist destination, “Journal of Research on Trade, Management and Economic Development”, no. 2, pp. 37–43.
Google Scholar

Mendoza Moheno J., Hernández Calzada M., Salazar Hernández B. (2017), Organizational Challenges for Building Smart Cities, [in:] M. Peris‑Ortiz, D. Bennett, D. Pérez‑Bustamante Yábar (eds.), Sustainable Smart Cities. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, Springer, Cham, pp. 89–99.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40895-8_7

Miller V. D., Allen M., Casey M. K., Johnson J. R. (2000), Reconsidering The Organizational Identification Questionnaire, “Management Communication Quarterly”, vol. 13(4), pp. 626–658.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318900134003

Morris A. S., Silk J. S., Steinberg L., Myers S. S., Robinson L. R. (2007), The role of the family context in the development of emotion regulation, “Social Development”, vol. 16(2), pp. 361–388.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00389.x

Mücevher M. H. (2015), Feature and interaction perceptions of generation X and Y against each other: SDU sample, Doctoral dissertation, SüleymanDemirel University Institute of Social Sciences, Isparta.
Google Scholar

O’Bannon G. (2001), Managing our future: The generation X factor, “Public Personnel Management”, vol. 30(1), pp. 95–110.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600103000109

Oblinger D., Oblinger J. (2005), Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation, [in:] D. Oblinger, J. Oblinger (eds.), Educating the Net Generation, Educause, Washington – Boulder, pp. 12–31.
Google Scholar

Oblinger D., Oblinger J. L., Lippincott J. K. (2005), Educating the net generation, Educause, Boulder.
Google Scholar

Özgözgü S. (2016), Corporate Image, Organizational Culture, and Organizational Identification Relationship, “Kastamonu Education Journal”, vol. 25(2), pp. 581–596.
Google Scholar

Özkalp E. (2013), Organizational Behavior, Ekin Publishing and Distribution, Bursa.
Google Scholar

Pieroni A., Scarpato N., Di Nunzio L., Fallucchi F., Raso M. (2018), Smarter City: Smart Energy Grid based on Blockchain Technology, “International Journal of Advance Science Engineering Information Technology”, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 298–306.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.1.4954

Quinn R. E. (1988), Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance, American Psychological Association, Jossey‑Bass, Washington.
Google Scholar

Schwarz T. (2008), Brace Yourself Here Comes Generation Y, “Critical Care Nurse”, vol. 28(5), pp. 80–85.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2008.28.5.80

Scott‑Findlay S., Estabrooks C. A. (2006), Mapping the Organizational Culture Research in Nursing: A Literature Review, “Journal of Advanced Nursing”, vol. 56(5), pp. 498–513.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04044.x

Serçek G. Ö., Serçek S. (2017), Comparison of destination image perceptions of tourists in X, Y and Z generations, “Travel and Hotel Management Journal”, vol. 14(1), pp. 6–19.
Google Scholar

Sever F. (2019), The effect of X and Y generation characteristics on organizational policy perception and political behavior, Master’s thesis, Balıkesir University Institute of Social Sciences, Balıkesir.
Google Scholar

Seymen O. A. (2008), A Research on Organizational Culture Types That Affect Organizational Commitment, Detay Publishing, Ankara.
Google Scholar

Simonofski A., Asensio E., De Smedt J., Snoeck M. (2019), Hearing the Voice of Citizens in Smart City Design: The Citi VoiceFramework, “Business & Information Systems Engineering”, issue 61, pp. 665–678.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0547-z

Tajfel H. E. (1978), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, Academic Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Taşkın A. G.N. (2011), Forgotten Contributions in the Development of Children: Fathers, “Journal of Educational Views”, no. 7, pp. 43–47.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(11)61646-1

Tokgöz E., Seymen O. A. (2013), The Relationship between Organizational Trust, Organizational Identification and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Research in a state hospital, “Öneri Journal”, vol. 10(39), pp. 61–76.
Google Scholar

Tolman E. C. (1943), Identification and the postwar world, “The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology”, vol. 38(2), pp. 141–148.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057497

Turner J. C., Brown R. J., Tajfel H. (1979), Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism, “European Journal of Social Psychology”, vol. 9(2), pp. 187–204.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420090207

Van Knippenberg D., Van Schie E. C. (2000), Foci and correlates of organizational identification, “Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology”, vol. 73(2), pp. 137–147.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900166949

Vukic M., Kuzmanovic M., Kostic Stankovic M. (2015), Understanding the heterogeneity of Generation Y’s preferences for travelling: A conjoint analysis approach, “International Journal of Tourism Research”, vol. 17(5), pp. 482–491, http://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2015
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2015

Washburn E. R. (2000), Are You Ready for Generation X? (Changing World View), “Physician Executive”, vol. 26(1), pp. 51–58.
Google Scholar

Williams S. (2010), Welcome to Generation Z, “B and T Magazine”, vol. 60(2731), pp. 1–12.
Google Scholar

Yesil S., Kaya S. (2013), The Effect of Organizational Culture on Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from a Developing Country, SciVerse ScienceDirect, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences no. 81, pp. 428–437.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.455

Zemke R., Raines C., Filipczak B. (1999), Generations at Work: Managing the Clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in Your Workplace, Amacom Publishing House, New York.
Google Scholar