Gender, unpaid labour and economics

Anna Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz

doi:10.18778/0208-6018.326.08

Autor

Anna Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz Jagiellonian University, Institute of Economics, Finance and Management

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.326.08

Słowa kluczowe:

praca nieodpłatna, opieka, kobiety, nierówności, teoria ekonomii

Abstrakt

Praca nieodpłatna, wraz z pracą opiekuńczą, jest wykonywana w większości przez kobiety. Teoria ekonomii wyjaśnia taką alokację czasu pomiędzy kobiety i mężczyzn w różny sposób – teorie neoklasyczne wskazują na racjonalny wybór związany ze zróżnicowaną efektywnością kobiet i mężczyzn na rynku pracy oraz w ramach gospodarstwa domowego, podczas gdy teorie heterodoksyjne skupiają się na wpływie norm, wartości społecznych i tradycji, zgodnie z którymi mężczyźni są żywicielami rodziny, a kobiety opiekunkami. Nieodpłatna praca jest trudna, męcząca i wymagająca, jednak nie zawsze jest szanowana i odpowiednio wyceniana. Głównym celem artykułu jest wykazanie znaczenia nieodpłatnej pracy opiekuńczej dla gospodarki.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Akerlof G.A., Kranton R.E. (2000), Economics and Identity, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 115, no. 3, p. 715–753.
Google Scholar

Albelda R. (1997), Economics and Feminism – Disturbances in the Field, Twayne Publishers, New York.
Google Scholar

Badgett M.V.L., Folbre N. (1999), Assigning care: Gender norms and economic outcomes, “International Labour Review”, vol. 138, no. 3, p. 311–326.
Google Scholar

Baker J., Lynch K., Cantillon S., Walsh J. (2009), Equality: From Theory to Action, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke.
Google Scholar

Becker G.S. (1965), A Theory of the Allocation of Time, “The Economic Journal”, vol. 75, p. 493–517.
Google Scholar

Becker G.S. (1973), A Theory of Marriage: Part I, “Journal of Political Economy”, vol. 81, no. 4, p. 813–846.
Google Scholar

Becker G.S. (1974), A Theory of Marriage: Part II, “Journal of Political Economy”, vol. 82, no. 2, p. 11–26.
Google Scholar

Becker G.S. (1981), A Treatise on the Family, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Google Scholar

Beneria L. (1999), The enduring debate over unpaid labour, “International Labour Review”, vol. 138, no. 3, p. 287–309.
Google Scholar

Carrasco C., Domínguez M. (2011), Family Strategies for Meeting Care and Domestic Work Needs: Evidence from Spain, “Feminist Economics”, 17(4), p. 159–188.
Google Scholar

Campillo F. (2003), Unpaid Househlod Labour: A Conceptual Approach, [in:] M. Gutierrez, Macroeconomics: Making Gender Matter: Concepts, Policies and Institutional Change in Developing Countries, New York: Zed Books, London, s. 106–121.
Google Scholar

Central Statistical Office (2015), Time Use Survey 2013, Warsaw.
Google Scholar

Esquivel V. (2011), Sixteen Years After Beijing: What Are New Policy Agendas for Time-Use Data Collection?, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 215–238.
Google Scholar

Filipowicz K., Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz A. (2015), Analysis of time use data – time allocation between women and men in Poland, [in:] E. Okoń-Horodyńska, A. Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz (eds.), Statistical profiles of women’s and men’s status in the economy, science and society, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków, p. 129–144.
Google Scholar

Floro M. (1995), Women’s Well-Being, Poverty, and Work Intensity, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 1–25.
Google Scholar

Folbre N. (1991), The Unproductive Housewife: Her Evolution in Nineteenth-Century Economic Thought, “Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society”, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 463–484.
Google Scholar

Folbre N. (2006), Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy, “Journal of Human Development”, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 183–199.
Google Scholar

Folbre N. (2009), Greed, Lust and Gender, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Foldvary F.E. (1996), Comparative economic theory, [in:] F.E. Foldvary (ed.) Beyond Neoclassical Economics; Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p. 1–21.
Google Scholar

Gálvez-Muñoz L., Rodríguez-Monroño P., Domínguez-Serrano M. (2011), Work and Time Use by Gender: A New Clustering of European Welfare Systems, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 17, no. 2, October, p. 125–157.
Google Scholar

Grapard U. (1996), Feminist economics: let me count the ways, [in:] F.E. Foldvary (ed.) Beyond Neoclassical Economics; Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p. 100–114.
Google Scholar

Himmelweit S. (1995), The Discovery of “Unpaid Work”: The Social Consequences of the Expansion of “Work”, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 1–19.
Google Scholar

Himmelweit S. (2002), Making Visible the Hidden Economy: The case for Gender-Impact Analysis of Economic Policy, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 49–70.
Google Scholar

Himmelweit S. (2005), Can We Afford (not)To Care: Prospects and Policy, “New Working Paper Series, Gender Institute” Issue 15, July.
Google Scholar

Hewitson G.J. (2003). Domestic labour and gender identity: are all women careers?, [in:] D.K. Barker, E. Kuiper (eds.), Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Economics, Routledge, London–New York, p. 266–284.
Google Scholar

Hozer-Koćmiel M. (2010), Statystyczna analiza podziału czasu i wartości pracy kobiet, [in:] Wybrane zagadnienia gospodarowania i zarządzania w pracach doktorskich obronionych na Wydziale Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, „Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania”, no. 20, p. 69–84.
Google Scholar

Humphries J. (1998), Towards a Family-Friendly Economics, “New Political Economy”, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 223–240.
Google Scholar

Jochimsen M.A. (2003), Integrating vulnerability: on the impact of caring on economic theorizing, [in:] D.K. Barker, E. Kuiper (eds.), Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Economics, Routledge, London–New York, p. 231–246.
Google Scholar

Lundberg S., Pollak R.A. (1996), Bargaining and Distribution in Marriage, “The Journal of Economic Perspectives”, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 139–158.
Google Scholar

Lynch K., Baker J., Lyons M. (2009), Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke.
Google Scholar

Nelson J.A. (1995), Feminism and Economics, “Journal of Economic Perspectives”, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 131–148.
Google Scholar

Picchio A. (1992), Social Reproduction: The Political Economy of the Labour Market, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Pujol M. (1995), Into the Margin, [in:] E. Kuiper, J. Sap, S. Feiner, N. Ott, Z. Tzannatos (eds.), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics, Routledge, London–New York, p. 17–34.
Google Scholar

Seiz J.E. (2007), Feminist Economics, [in:] W.J. Samuels, J.E. Biddle, J.B. Davis (eds.), A Companion to The History of Economic Thought, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, p. 454–462.
Google Scholar

Sirianni C., Negrey C. (2000), Working Time as Gendered Time, “Feminist Economics”, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 59–76.
Google Scholar

Standing G. (2001), Care work: Overcoming insecurity and neglect, [in:] M. Daly (ed.) Care Work; The quest for security, International Labour Organization, Geneva, p. 15–32.
Google Scholar

Standing G. (2009), Work after globalization; Building Occupational Citizenship, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northampton.
Google Scholar

World Bank (1995), Advancing Gender Equality: From Concept to Action, World Bank, Washington D.C.
Google Scholar

Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz A., Mroczek K. (2015), Time Allocation and the Life Cycle of Women and Men in Poland, [in:] S. Moore (ed.) Contemporary Global Perspectives on Gender Economics, IGI Global, Hershey, p. 293–314.
Google Scholar