Przegląd i ocena wybranych wskaźników dostępności i atrakcyjności miejskich terenów zieleni

Magdalena Biernacka

doi:10.18778/0208-6018.347.04

Authors

Magdalena Biernacka University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Regional Economics and Environment, Social-Ecological Systems Analysis Lab https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0629-9547

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.347.04

Keywords:

spatial planning, green space indicators, accessibility metrics, urban green space, quality of life in the city

Abstract

One of the Sustainable Development Goals promoted by the UN, as well as in other international declarations and strategic documents (WHO, European Union), is to ensure: “universal access to safe, public green spaces”. The main goal of this article is to present and discuss selected indicators of accessibility and attractiveness of urban green spaces (especially those formal and publicly available). The review includes both indicators constructed for research purposes and for spatial planning in cities. Many indicators have been proposed in the literature to measure access to green spaces, taking into account aspects such as: distance, green space area and amount of green space per capita. Such indicators are very general, they do not reflect the condition of a particular green space, and they are used mostly for planning purposes. Sometimes, they are extended to issues closely related to access, such as property rights, opening hours and physical barriers (e.g. busy roads or rivers that significantly hinder access to a given green space). Moreover, these indicators are connected with additional features of green spaces pertaining to their attractiveness (cleanliness, equipment, number of users, biodiversity). Only such a comprehensive analysis of accessibility and attractiveness allows us to capture the actual state of affairs and the possible implementation of activities improving access to attractive urban green spaces. These indicators capture respectively the accessibility of green spaces and their attractiveness. The review mainly covered English‑language literature. The article provides a review of existing indicators and synthesizes knowledge related to the broadly understood access and attractiveness of urban green spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersson E., Tengö M., McPhearson T., Kremer P. (2015), Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability, „Ecosystem Services”, nr 12, s. 165–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002

Arana M., San M. R., Salinas J. C. (2014), People exposed to traffic noise in european agglomerations from noise maps. A critical review, „Noise Mapping”, nr 1(1), s. 40–49, https://doi.org/10.2478/noise‑2014‑0005
Google Scholar

Baró F., Chaparro L., Gómez‑Baggethun E., Langemeyer J., Nowak D. J., Terradas J. (2014), Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: the case of urban forests in Barcelona, Spain, „AMBIO”, nr 43(4), s. 466–479, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x

Bertram C., Rehdanz K. (2015), The role of urban green space for human well‑being, „Ecological Economics”, nr 120, s. 139–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.013
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.013

Biernacka M., Kronenberg J. (2018), Classification of institutional barriers affecting the availability, accessibility and attractiveness of urban green spaces, „Urban Forestry and Urban Greening”, nr 36, s. 22–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.007
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.007

Biernacka M., Kronenberg J. (2019), Urban Green Space Availability, Accessibility and Attractiveness, and the Delivery of Ecosystem Services, „Cities and the Environment”, t. 12, cz. 1, https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol12/iss1/5
Google Scholar

Biernacka M., Kronenberg J., Łaszkiewicz E. (2020), An integrated system of monitoring the availability, accessibility and attractiveness of urban parks and green squares, ,,Applied Geography”, t. 116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102152
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102152

Brown G., Schebella M. F., Weber D. (2014), Using participatory GIS to measure physical activity and urban park benefits, „Landscape and Urban Planning”, nr 121, s. 34–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.006
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.006

Brulle R. J., Pellow D. N. (2006), Environmental Justice: Human Health and Environmental Inequalities, „Annual Review of Public Health”, nr 27(1), s. 103–124, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102124
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102124

Carrus G., Scopelliti M., Lafortezza R., Colangelo G., Ferrini F., Salbitano F., Sanesi G. (2015), Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well‑being of individuals visiting urban and peri‑urban green areas, „Landscape and Urban Planning”, nr 134, s. 221–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022

Colesca S. E., Alpopi C. (2011), The Quality of Bucharest’s Green Spaces, „Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management”, nr 6(4), s. 45–59.
Google Scholar

Diekmann A., Meyer R. (2010), Democratic smog? An empirical study on the correlation between social class and environmental pollution, „Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie”, nr 62(3), s. 437–457.
Google Scholar

Elmqvist T., Setälä H., Handel S. N., Ploeg S. van der, Aronson J., Blignaut J. N., De Groot R. S. (2015), Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas, „Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability”, nr 14, s. 101–108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001

Feltynowski M., Kronenberg J., Bergier T., Kabisch N., Łaszkiewicz E., Strohbach M. (2018), Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data, „Urban Forestry and Urban Greening”, nr 31, s. 56–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.003
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.003

Gidlöf‑Gunnarsson A., Öhrström E. (2007), Noise and well‑being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas, „Landscape and Urban Planning”, nr 83(2–3), s. 115–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.003
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.003

Giles‑Corti B., Broomhall M. H., Knuiman M., Collins C., Douglas K., Ng K., Donovan R. J. (2005), Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?, „American Journal of Preventive Medicine”, nr 28, cz. 2, supplement 2, s. 169–176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018

Gómez‑Baggethun E., Gren Å., Barton D. N., Langemeyer J., McPhearson T., O’Farrell P., Kremer P. (2013), Urban ecosystem services, [w:] T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R. I. McDonald, C. Wilkinson (red.), Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities, Springer, Dordrecht, s. 175–251.
Google Scholar

Grunewald K., Richter B., Meinel G., Herold H., Syrbe R.‑U. (2017), Proposal of indicators regarding the provision and accessibility of green spaces for assessing the ecosystem service „recreation in the city” in Germany, „International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management”, nr 13(2), s. 26–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1283361
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1283361

Haines‑Young R., Potschin M. (2018), Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1: Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure, Fabis Consulting Ltd., Nottingham.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108

Hamilton K. L. (2011), Park Usage and Physical Activity: An Exploration of Park Features, Neighbourhoods, and Park Programs (Thesis), https://qspace.library.queensu.ca/handle/1974/6795 [dostęp: 10.04.2017].
Google Scholar

Higgs G., Fry R., Langford M. (2012), Investigating the implications of using alternative GIS‑based techniques to measure accessibility to green space, „Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design”, nr 39(2), s. 326–343, https://doi.org/10.1068/b37130
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b37130

Kabisch N., Strohbach M., Haase D., Kronenberg J. (2016), Urban green space availability in European cities, „Ecological Indicators”, nr 70, s. 586–596, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.029
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.029

Kaczynski A. T., Schipperijn J., Hipp J. A., Besenyi G. M., Wilhelm Stanis S. A., Hughey S. M., Wilcox S. (2016), ParkIndex: Development of a standardized metric of park access for research and planning, „Preventive Medicine”, nr 87, s. 110–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.012
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.012

Kahila M., Kyttä M. (2009), SoftGIS as a Bridge‑Builder in Collaborative Urban Planning, [w:] D. S. Geertman, P. J. Stillwell (red.), Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods, Springer, Netherlands, s. 389–411.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_19

Kan H., Chen B. (2004), Particulate air pollution in urban areas of Shanghai, China: health‑based economic assessment, „Science of The Total Environment”, nr 322(1–3), s. 71–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.09.010
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.09.010

Koprowska K., Łaszkiewicz E., Kronenberg J., Marcińczak S. (2018), Subjective perception of noise exposure in relation to urban green space availability, „Urban Forestry and Urban Greening”, nr 31, s. 93–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.018
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.018

Kragh J. (1981), Road traffic noise attenuation by belts of trees, „Journal of Sound and Vibration”, nr 74(2), s. 235–241, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(81)90506-X
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(81)90506-X

Kronenberg J. (2015), Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services, „Ecosystem Services”, nr 12, s. 218–227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.002
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.002

Larson L. R., Jennings V., Cloutier S. A. (2016), Public Parks and Wellbeing in Urban Areas of the United States, „PLOS ONE”, nr 11(4), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153211
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153211

Lottrup L., Grahn P., Stigsdotter U. K. (2013), Workplace greenery and perceived level of stress: Benefits of access to a green outdoor environment at the workplace, „Landscape and Urban Planning”, nr 110, s. 5–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.002
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.002

Łaszkiewicz E., Kronenberg J., Marcińczak S. (2018), Attached to or bound to a place? The impact of green space availability on residential duration: The environmental justice perspective, „Ecosystem Services”, nr 30, s. 309–317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.002
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.002

Mohai P., Pellow D., Roberts J. T. (2009), Environmental Justice, „Annual Review of Environment and Resources”, nr 34(1), s. 405–430, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348

Morar T., Radoslav R., Spiridon L. C., Păcurar L. (2014), Assessing pedestrian accessibility to green space using GIS, „Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences”, nr 10(42), s. 116–139.
Google Scholar

Nature nearby: Accessible natural greenspace guidance (2010), Natural England, Peterborough.
Google Scholar

Nieuwenhuijsen M. J., Kruize H., Gidlow C., Andrusaityte S., Antó J. M., Basagaña X., Grazule-viciene R. (2014), Positive health effects of the natural outdoor environment in typical populations in different regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE): a study programme protocol, „BMJ Open”, nr 4(4), e004951, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004951
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004951

Nowak D. J., Crane D. E., Stevens J. C. (2006), Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States, „Urban Forestry and Urban Greening”, nr 4(3–4), s. 115–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007

Park K. (2017), Psychological park accessibility: a systematic literature review of perceptual components affecting park use, „Landscape Research”, nr 42(5), s. 508–520, https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1267127
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1267127

Pietrzyk‑Kaszyńska A., Czepkiewicz M., Kronenberg J. (2017), Eliciting non‑monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS, „Landscape and Urban Planning”, nr 160, s. 85–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.012
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.012

Projektowanie uniwersalne (2018), zeszyt 20, Regionalne Centrum Polityki Społecznej w Łodzi, Łódź.
Google Scholar

Rantanen H., Kahila M. (2009), The SoftGIS approach to local knowledge, „Journal of Environmental Management”, nr 90(6), s. 1981–1990, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.025
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.025

Rozporządzenie Ministra Infrastruktury z dnia 12 kwietnia 2002 r. w sprawie warunków technicznych, jakim powinny odpowiadać budynki i ich usytuowanie (Dz.U. nr 75, poz. 690).
Google Scholar

Schipperijn J., Ekholm O., Stigsdotter U. K., Toftager M., Bentsen P., Kamper‑Jørgensen F., Randrup T. B. (2010), Factors influencing the use of green space: Results from a Danish national representative survey, „Landscape and Urban Planning”, nr 95(3), s. 130–137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.010
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.010

Ståhle A. (2006), Sociotope mapping: Exploring public open space and its multiple use values in urban and landscape planning practice, „Nordic Journal of Architectural Research”, nr 19(4), s. 59–71.
Google Scholar

Stanners D., Bourdeau P. (red.) (1995), The urban environment, [w:] Europe’s Environment: The Dobris Assessment, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, http://www.forskningsdatabasen.dk/en/catalog/2186121094 [dostęp: 10.04.2017].
Google Scholar

Studium Uwarunkowań i Kierunków Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego Miasta Łodzi. Uwarunkowania (2018), Miejska Pracownia Urbanistyczna w Łodzi, Łódź.
Google Scholar

Susca T., Gaffin S. R., Dell’Osso G. R. (2011), Positive effects of vegetation: Urban heat island and green roofs, „Environmental Pollution”, nr 159(8–9), s. 2119–2126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.03.007
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.03.007

Tian Y., Jim C. Y., Wang H. (2014), Assessing the landscape and ecological quality of urban green spaces in a compact city, „Landscape and Urban Planning”, nr 121, s. 97–108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.001

Ustawa z dnia 7 czerwca 2018 r. – Prawo budowlane (Dz.U. z 2018 r., poz. 1202).
Google Scholar

Van Herzele A., Wiedemann T. (2003), A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces, „Landscape and Urban Planning”, nr 63(2), s. 109–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5

Walker G. (2012), Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203610671

Ward Thompson C., Roe J., Aspinall P., Mitchell R., Clow A., Miller D. (2012), More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns, „Landscape and Urban Planning”, nr 105(3), s. 221–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015

Wei H., Fan W., Wang X., Lu N., Dong X., Zhao Y., Ya X., Zhao Y. (2017), Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review, „Ecosystem Services”, nr 25, s. 15–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.017
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.017

WHO (2010), Urban planning, environment and health: from evidence to policy action, http://www.euro.who.int/en/health‑topics/environment‑and‑health/Housing‑and‑health/publications/2010/urban‑planning,‑environment‑and‑health‑from‑evidence‑to‑policy‑action [dostęp: 10.04.2017].
Google Scholar

Wüstemann H., Kalisch D., Kolbe J. (2017), Access to urban green space and environmental inequalities in Germany, „Landscape and Urban Planning”, nr 164, s. 124–131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.002
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.002

Zarządzenie nr 118 Ministra Budownictwa i Przemysłu Materiałów Budowlanych z 15 czerwca 1964 roku w sprawie wskaźników wykorzystywania terenów zainwestowania miejskiego.
Google Scholar