Collaborative communities as a selling point? From community-driven to service-purposed coworking spaces

Marko Orel; Will Bennis

doi:10.18778/1231-1952.28.2.15

Authors

Marko Orel Prague University of Economics and Business, Department of Entrepreneurship, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czechia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1931-7310
Will Bennis Prague University of Economics and Business, Department of Entrepreneurship, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czechia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7481-6438

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.28.2.15

Keywords:

coworking, shared workspaces, community-washing, mediation

Abstract

Coworking spaces emerged in the mid-2000s as collaborative workplaces that actively supported teleworkers and self-employed knowledge workers who shared various (work) environments to interlace themselves in supportive networks, tackle isolation, positively influence well-being, and collaboratively participate in knowledge-sharing activities. However, with the swift popularisation of the coworking model by 2020, newly established flexible office spaces have begun to refer to themselves as community-based workplaces even though they lacked the capacity to support their users’ interactions and collaborative work. Therefore, the purpose of the paper is to explore how coworking spaces have transformed from community-based environments to a flexible place of work where establishing a collaborative community is not an organisational priority. The following exploratory research investigates a sample of 13 coworking spaces in Prague, the Czech Republic, and considers their capacity for supporting interactions and collaborative processes between their users. The results uncovered significant differences between coworking spaces, their spatial designs, the presence of mediation mechanisms, and the frequency of interactions between users, and suggest that the handful of sampled coworking environments misuse the notion of community. In that context, the following study indicates that contemporary coworking spaces can revert to community washing to deliberately pursue economic self-interest rather than support decentralised peer-to-peer exchange that would lead to developing a coworking community.

^*The research was funded by the Czech Science Foundation (GACR), grant number 20-06716S.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AGUITON, C. and CARDON, D. (2008), ‘Barcamps and coworking: Collective web-based infrastructures for innovation’, Hermès, La Revue, (1), pp. 75–82. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/24155
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/24155

AKHAVAN, M., MARIOTTI, I., ASTOLFI, L. and CANEVARI, A. (2019), ‘Coworking Spaces and New Social Relations: A Focus on the Social Streets in Italy’, Urban Science, 3 (1), pp. 2–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010002
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010002

ARORA, S. (2017), ‘Changing dynamics of corporate real estate: The rise of coworking spaces’, Corporate Real Estate Journal, 7 (2), pp. 127–136.
Google Scholar

AVDIKOS, V. and ILIOPOULOU, E. (2019), ‘Community-Led Coworking Spaces: From Co-location to Collaboration and Collectivisation’, [in:] GILL, R., PRATT A. and VIRANI, T. (eds.), Creative Hubs in Question. Dynamics of Virtual Work, pp. 111–129, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10653-9_6
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10653-9_6

AVRAM, G., CHOI, J. H. J., De PAOLI, S., LIGHT, A., LYLE, P. and TELI, M. (2017), ‘Collaborative economies: From sharing to caring’, [in:] Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, pp. 305–307, ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083712
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083712

BIANCHI, F., CASNICI, N. and SQUAZZONI, F. (2018), ‘Solidarity as a by-product of professional collaboration: social support and trust in a coworking space’, Social Networks, 54, pp. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.12.002
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.12.002

BLAGOEV, B., COSTAS, J. and KÄRREMAN, D. (2019), ‘«We are all herd animals»: Community and organizationality in coworking spaces’, Organisation, 26 (6), pp. 894–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418821008
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418821008

BOUNCKEN, R. B. and REUSCHL, A. J. (2018), ‘Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship’, Review of Managerial Science, 12 (1), pp. 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y

BOUNCKEN, R. B., LAUDIEN, S. M., FREDRICH, V. and GÖRMAR, L. (2018), ‘Coopetition in coworking-spaces: value creation and appropriation tensions in an entrepreneurial space’, Review of Managerial Science, 12 (2), pp. 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0267-7
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0267-7

BOUNCKEN, R. and ASLAM, M. M. (2019), ‘Understanding knowledge exchange processes among diverse users of coworking-spaces’, Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0316
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0316

BRAUN, V. and CLARKE, V. (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), pp. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

BROWN, J. (2017), ‘Curating the «Third Place»? Coworking and the mediation of creativity’, Geoforum, 82, pp. 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.006
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.006

BUENO, S., RODRÍGUEZ-BALTANÁS, G. and GALLEGO, M. D. (2018), ‘Coworking spaces: A new way of achieving productivity’, Journal of Facilities Management, 16 (4), pp. 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-01-2018-0006
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-01-2018-0006

BUTCHER, T. (2018), ‘Learning everyday entrepreneurial practices through coworking’, Management Learning, 49 (3), pp. 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507618757088
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507618757088

CABRAL, V. and Van WINDEN, W. (2016), ‘Coworking: an analysis of coworking strategies for interaction and innovation’, International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 7 (4), p. 357. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2016.10001777
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2016.10001777

CAPDEVILA, I. (2014), ‘How can city labs enhance the citizens’ motivation in different types of innovation activities?’, [in:] AIELLO, L. and MCFARLAND, D. (eds.), International Conference on Social Informatics, pp. 64–71, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15168-7_9
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15168-7_9

CASTILHO, M. F. and QUANDT, C. O. (2017), ‘Collaborative Capability in Coworking Spaces: Convenience Sharing or Community Building?’, Technology Innovation Management Review, 7 (12), pp. 32–42. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1126
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1126

CHEAH, S. and HO, Y. P. (2019), ‘Coworking and Sustainable Business Model Innovation in Young Firms’, Sustainability, 11 (10), pp. 29–59. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102959
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102959

CONSTANTINESCU, T. and DEVISCH, O. (2018), ‘Portraits of work: mapping emerging coworking dynamics’, Information, Communication & Society, 21 (9), pp. 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1459775
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1459775

De PEUTER, G., COHEN, N. S. and SARACO, F. (2017), ‘The ambivalence of coworking: On the politics of an emerging work practice’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 20 (6), pp. 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417732997
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417732997

FUENTES, C. M. M. (2008), ‘Pathways from interpersonal violence to sexually transmitted infections: A mixed-method study of diverse women’, Journal of women’s health, 17 (10), pp. 1591–1603. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2008.0885
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2008.0885

FUZI, A., GRYSZKIEWICZ, L. and SIKORA, D. (2018), ‘A Spectrum of Urban Innovation Intermediaries: from Coworking to Collaboration’, [in:] ISPIM Conference Proceedings, pp. 1–6, The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM).
Google Scholar

GANDINI, A. (2016), ‘Coworking: The Freelance Mode of Organisation?’ [in:] The Reputation Economy, pp. 97–105, London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56107-7_7
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56107-7_7

GARRETT, L. E., SPREITZER, G. M. and BACEVICE, P. A. (2017), ‘Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces’, Organisation Studies, 38 (6), pp. 821–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685354
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685354

GAUGER, F., STRYCH, J. O. and PFNÜR, A. (2019), The link between coworking space demand and venture capital financing: Empirical evidence from European office market (No. eres2019_170). European Real Estate Society (ERES).
Google Scholar

GERDENITSCH, C., SCHEEL, T. E., ANDORFER, J. and KORUNKA, C. (2016), ‘Coworking spaces: A source of social support for independent professionals’, Frontiers in Psychology, 7, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581

GREEN, R. (2014), ‘Collaborate or compete: how do landlords respond to the rise in coworking?’, Cornell Real Estate Review, 12 (1), p. 9.
Google Scholar

GREGG, M. and LODATO, T. (2018), ‘Managing community: Co working, hospitality and the future of work’, [in:] RÖTTGER-RÖSSLER, B. and SLABY, J. (eds.), Affect in Relation. Families, Places, Technologies, pp. 175–196, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315163864-9
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315163864-9

GUEST, G., MACQUEEN, K. M. and NAMEY, E. E. (2012), Applied thematic analysis, SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436

HALL, G., SIGALA, M., RENTSCHLER, R. and BOYLE, S. (2019), ‘Motivations, Mobility and Work Practices; The Conceptual Realities of Digital Nomads’, [in:] Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, 2019, pp. 437–449, Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar

HAUBRICH, G. F. (2021), ‘Mediation Matters: The Role of Staff in Coworking Constitution’, [in:] OREL, M., DVOULETÝ, O. and RATTEN, V. (eds), The Flexible Workplace. Human Resource Management, pp. 157–172, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62167-4_9
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62167-4_9

HAWLITSCHEK, F., STOFBERG, N., TEUBNER, T., TU, P. and WEINHARDT, C. (2018), ‘How corporate sharewashing practices undermine consumer trust’, Sustainability, 10 (8), p. 2638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082638
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082638

HESSE-BIBER, S. (2010), ‘Qualitative approaches to mixed methods practice’, Qualitative inquiry, 16 (6), pp. 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364611
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364611

HILL, A. (2019), ‘Companies beware the cult of community’, https://www.ft.com/content/ee5fa6aa-c424-11e9-ae6e-a26d1d0455f4 [accessed on: 29.11.2019].
Google Scholar

KOVÁCS, J. K. and ZOLTÁN, E. S. (2017), ‘Rural enterprise hub supporting rural entrepreneurship and innovation–case studies from Hungary’, European Countryside, 9 (3), pp. 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0028
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0028

KUBÁTOVÁ, J. (2014), ‘The cause and impact of the development of coworking in the current knowledge economy’, [in:] Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Santarem, Portugal, pp. 4–5.
Google Scholar

LECLERCQ-VANDELANNOITTE, A. and ISAAC, H. (2016), ‘The new office: how coworking changes the work concept’, Journal of Business Strategy, 37 (6), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-10-2015-0105
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-10-2015-0105

LUKMAN, Y. A., EKOMADYO, A. S. and WIBOWO, A. S. (2018), ‘Assembling the Past and the Future of the City through Designing Coworking Facilities’, [in:] IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 158 (1), p. 012051, IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012051
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012051

LUMLEY, R. M. (2014), ‘A coworking project in the campus library: supporting and modeling entrepreneurial activity in the academic library’, New Review of Academic Librarianship, 20 (1), pp. 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2013.850101
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2013.850101

MARCHEGIANI, L. and ARCESE, G. (2018), ‘Collaborative spaces and coworking as hybrid workspaces: friends or foes of learning and innovation?’ [in:] BOCCARDELLI, P., ANNOSI, M., BRUNETTA, F. and MAGNUSSON, M. (eds.), Learning and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations, pp. 51–71, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62467-9_4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62467-9_4

MAYERHOFFER, M. (2020), ‘Growth factors of the coworking industry: the case of Prague’, Journal of Property Investment & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-12-2019-0164
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-12-2019-0164

MERKEL, J. (2015), ‘Coworking in the city’, Ephemera, 15 (2), pp. 121–139.
Google Scholar

MERKEL, J. (2019), ‘Curating Strangers’, [in:] GILL, R., PRATT, A. and VIRANI, T. (eds.), Creative Hubs in Question. Dynamics of Virtual Work, pp. 51–68, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10653-9_3
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10653-9_3

MIREL, D. (2015), ‘Redefining the work place: as collaborative cowork spaces continue to gain popularity, these progressive office spaces are creating their own unique personalities to draw in members’, Journal of Property Management, 80 (4), pp. 48–55.
Google Scholar

NAGY, G. and GREG, L. (2018), ‘Why Companies Are Creating Their Own Coworking Spaces’, Harvard Business Review online.
Google Scholar

Nomadlist. (n.d), [Nomadlist directory for coworking spaces in Prague, Czech Republic]. https://nomadlist.com/coworking/prague [accessed on: 4.11.2019].
Google Scholar

NOWELL, L. S., NORRIS, J. M., WHITE, D. E. and MOULES, N. J. (2017), ‘Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16 (1), pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

OREL, M. (2019), ‘Supporting work–life balance with the use of coworking spaces’, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 39 (5), pp. 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-01-2019-0038
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-01-2019-0038

OREL, M. and ALONSO ALMEIDA, M. D. M. (2019), ‘The ambience of collaboration in coworking environments’, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 21 (4), pp. 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-12-2018-0050
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-12-2018-0050

OREL, M. and DVOULETÝ, O. (2020), ‘Transformative changes and developments of the coworking model: A narrative review’, [in:] RATTEN, V. (ed.), Technological Progress, Inequality and Entrepreneurship. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics, pp. 9–27, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26245-7_2
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26245-7_2

PARRINO, L. (2015), ‘Coworking: assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange’, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13 (3), pp. 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.47
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.47

PENZ, E., HARTL, B. and HOFMANN, E. (2018), ‘Collectively Building a Sustainable Sharing Economy Based on Trust and Regulation’, Sustainability, 10 (10), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103754
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103754

PRICE, L. L. and BELK, R. W. (2016), ‘Consumer ownership and sharing: Introduction to the issue’, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1 (2), pp. 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1086/686270
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/686270

ROUSSEL, P. (2016), ‘Coworking cities in Prague’, https://medium.com/coworking-people-spaces/13-coworking-cities-prague-8a376e96931a [accessed on: 4.11.2019].
Google Scholar

ROSATI, U. and CONTI, S. (2016), ‘What is a smart city project? An urban model or a corporate business plan?’, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, pp. 968–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.332
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.332

ROSS, P. and RESSIA, S. (2015), ‘Neither office nor home: Coworking as an emerging workplace choice’, Employment Relations Record, 15 (1), pp. 42–57.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.21500

RUS, A. and OREL, M. (2015), ‘Coworking: a community of work’, Teorija in Praksa, 52 (6), pp. 1017–1038.
Google Scholar

SARGENT, K., COOPER, J., MELLWIG, B. and MCDONALD, M. (2018), ‘Coworking and the disruption of the current corporate real estate model’, Corporate Real Estate Journal, 7 (3), pp. 267–276.
Google Scholar

SCHMIDT, S., BRINKS, V. and BRINKHOFF, S. (2014), ‘Innovation and creativity labs in Berlin’, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 58 (1), pp. 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw.2014.0016
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw.2014.0016

SCHOPFEL, J., ROCHE, J. and HUBERT, G. (2015), ‘Coworking and innovation: new concepts for academic libraries and learning centres’, New Library World, 116 (1/2), pp. 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-06-2014-0072
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-06-2014-0072

SCHOR, J. (2016), ‘Debating the sharing economy’, Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 4 (3), pp. 7–22. https://doi.org/10.22381/JSME4320161
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.22381/JSME4320161

SPINUZZI, C. (2012), ‘Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26 (4), pp. 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070

SPINUZZI, C., BODROŽIĆ, Z., SCARATTI, G. and IVALDI, S. (2019), ‘«Coworking Is About Community»: But What Is «Community» in Coworking?’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, pp. 112–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918816357
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918816357

SURMAN, T. (2013), ‘Building social entrepreneurship through the power of coworking’, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8 (3–4), pp. 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00195
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00195

SÝKORA, L. (2017), ‘Urban development, policy and planning in the Czech Republic and Prague’, [in:] ALTROCK, U., GÜNTNER, S. and PETERS, D., Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Member States, pp. 127–154, London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

ŠINDELÁŘOVÁ, L. and KUBÍKOVÁ, P. (2018), Coworking in The Czech Republic, BNP Paribas Real Estate Report.
Google Scholar

TERRY, G., HAYFIELD, N., CLARKE, V. and BRAUN, V. (2017), ‘Thematic analysis’, The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2, pp. 17–37. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2

WATERS-LYNCH, J. and POTTS, J. (2017), ‘The social economy of coworking spaces: a focal point model of coordination’, Review of Social Economy, 75 (4), pp. 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2016.1269938
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2016.1269938

WEIJS-PERRÉE, M., van de KOEVERING, J., APPEL-MEULENBROEK, H. A. J. A., and ARENTZE, T. A. (2017), ‘User preferences for coworking space characteristics’, [in:] 24th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference (ERES 2017), pp. 145–162. https://doi.org/10.15396/eres2017_88
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15396/eres2017_88

YANG, E., BISSON, C. and SANBORN, B. E. (2019), ‘Coworking space as a third-fourth place: changing models of a hybrid space in corporate real estate’, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 21 (4), pp. 324–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-12-2018-0051
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-12-2018-0051