Foreword

Authors

  • Grzegorz Micek Jagiellonian University, Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

2019 Global Coworking Survey (2019), Coworking Forecast, Deskmag.


Google Scholar

AKHAVAN, M., MARIOTTI, I., ASTOLFI, L. and CANEVARI, A. (2019), ‘Coworking Spaces and New Social Relations: A Focus on the Social Streets in Italy’, Urban Science, 3 (2). doi: 10.3390/urbansci3010002
Google Scholar

BEDNÁŘ, P. and DANKO, L. (2020), ‘Coworking spaces as a driver of the post-Fordist city: A tool for building a creative ecosystem’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 105–125.
Google Scholar

BÜRKNER, H.-J. and LANGE, B. (2020), ‘New geographies of work: Re-scaling micro-worlds’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 53–74.
Google Scholar

CAPDEVILA, I. (2015), ‘Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona’, International Journal of Innovation Management, 19 (3), 1540004, pp. 1–25.
Google Scholar

DOUGHERTY, D. (2012), ‘The maker movement’, Innovations, 7 (3), pp. 11–14.
Google Scholar

GĄDECKI, J., AFELTOWICZ Ł., ANIELSKA, K. and MORAWSKA, I. (2020), ‘How innovation districts (do not) work: The case study of Cracow’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 149–171.
Google Scholar

HATCH, M. (2014), The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers, New York: McGraw‐Hill.
Google Scholar

KOJO, I. and NENONEN, S. (2017), ‘Evolution of co-working places: drivers and possibilities’, Intelligent Buildings International, 9 (3), pp. 164–175.
Google Scholar

MARIOTTI, I. and AKHAVAN, M. (2020), ‘Exploring proximities in coworking spaces: Evidence from Italy’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 37–52.
Google Scholar

MARIOTTI, I., PACCHI, C. and DI VITA, S. (2017), ‘Co-working Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects’, Journal of Urban Technology, 24 (3), pp. 47–66.
Google Scholar

MICEK, G. (2020), ‘Studies of proximity in coworking spaces: The basic conceptual challenges’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 9–35.
Google Scholar

OLDENBURG, R. (1989), The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community, Cambridge, MA, Da Capo Press.
Google Scholar

PARLAK, M. and BAYCAN, T. (2020), ‘The rise of creative hubs in Istanbul’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 127–147.
Google Scholar

SALONE C., BONINI BARALDI, S. and PAZZOLA, G. (2017), ‘Cultural production in peripheral urban spaces: lessons from Barriera, Turin (Italy)’, European Planning Studies, 25 (12), pp. 2117–2137.
Google Scholar

SCHMIDT, S. and BRINKS, V. (2017), ‘Open creative labs: Spatial settings at the intersection of communities and organizations’, Creativity and Innovation Management, 26, pp. 291–299.
Google Scholar

SCHUTJENS, V. and KRUGER, M. (2020), ‘The role of proximity in resources exchanged by incubatees of BioPartner Center Leiden, the Netherlands’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27 (1), pp. 75–104.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Micek, G. (2020). Foreword. European Spatial Research and Policy, 27(1), 5–8. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/esrap/article/view/8136

Issue

Section

Other