Universities as Embedded Knowledge Hubs and the Challenge of Local Development. The US Lessons and the Italian Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10105-009-0010-8Keywords:
knowledge-based economy, university education, local and regional developmentAbstract
This article discusses the claim of a new paradigm in the knowledge production and diffusion process, and the need to assess the regional and local implications of this modal shift. After introductory remarks included in the first part of the paper, its next section introduces the theme of localisation of knowledge as a source of regional development; section three examines the lessons we can extract from the US university system (with a particular regard to the case of Johns Hopkins University and the recent project for a biotech park in the city of Baltimore); in section four an illustration of the Italian University system leads to a description of the current evolution of the University of Bologna toward a new entrepreneurial role. The last part of the paper discusses the embedded role of universities in the light of the two cases presented in the previous sections and draws the conclusions in terms of regional policy.
Downloads
References
ANTARES (2007), Rapporto di ricerca sul distretto della meccatronica a Reggio Emilia, accessibile online ( www.centro-antares.net
Google Scholar
AUDRETSCH, D. B. et al. (2002), ‘The Economics of Science and Technology’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 27 pp. 155-203.
Google Scholar
AUDRETSCH, D. B. and FELDMAN, M. P. (1996), ‘R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production’, The American Economic Review, 86(3).
Google Scholar
AUTM (2007), Licensing activity survey FY 2007, accessible online.
Google Scholar
BALDERI, C., BUTELLI, P., CONTI, G., Di MININ, A. and PICCALUGA, A. (2007), ‘Towards an Italian Way in the Valorisation of Results from Public Research’, Impresa progetto, 1 pp. 1-32, accessible on line.
Google Scholar
BANCA D'ITALIA. (2007), Note sull'andamento dell'economia dell'Emilia Romagna, accessibile online.
Google Scholar
BENDER, T. (ed.), (1988), The University and the City: From Medieval Origins to Present, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
BERCOVITZ, J. and FELDMAN, M. (2006), ‘Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-based Economic Development’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 pp. 175-188.
Google Scholar
BERCOVITZ, J., FELDMAN, M., FELLER, I. and BURTON, R. (2001), ‘Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behaviour: An Explanatory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26 pp. 21-35.
Google Scholar
BEST, M. H. (2005), ‘Regional Specialization and Cluster Drivers: Medical Devices in Massachusetts’, Business and Economic History, online.
Google Scholar
BOSHMA, R. A. (2005), ‘Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment’, Regional Studies, 39(1), pp. 61-74.
Google Scholar
CHARLES, D. (2006), ‘Universities as Key Knowledge Infrastructures in Regional Innovation Systems’, Innovation, 19(1), pp. 117-130.
Google Scholar
COOKE, P. and LEYDESDORF, L. (2006), ‘Regional Development in the Knowledge-based Economy: The Construction of Advantage’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 3 pp. 5-15.
Google Scholar
COOKE, P. (2004), ‘Life sciences clusters and regional science policy’, Urban Studies, 5-6, pp. 1113-1131.
Google Scholar
CRUI-Netval (2007), Il salto di qualità. Quinto rapporto annuale sulla valorizzazione della ricerca nelle università italiane, Decembre, accessible online.
Google Scholar
DAVID, P. and FORAY, D. (2002), ‘An Introduction to the Economy of the Knowledge Society’, International Social Science Journal, 54(171), pp. 9-23.
Google Scholar
DICKEN, P. and MALMBERG, A. (2001), ‘Firms in Territories: A Relational Perspective’, Economic Geography, 77(4).
Google Scholar
EVANS, H. D. (2008), ‘Knowledge Hubs and Knowledge Clusters: Designing a Knowledge Architecture for Development’, ZET Working Paper Series, Bonn: Department of Political and Cultural Change, accessible online.
Google Scholar
ETZKOWITZ, H. (2003), ‘Research Groups as "Quasi-firms": The Invention of the Entrepreneurial University’, Research Policy, 32 pp. 109-121.
Google Scholar
ETZKOWITZ, H. (2004), ‘The Evolution of the Entrepreneurial University’, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1 (1).
Google Scholar
ETZKOWITZ, H. and LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000), ‘The Dynamics of Innovation: Form National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations’, Research Policy, 29 pp. 109-123.
Google Scholar
ETZKOWITZ, H. and ZHOU, C. (2007), ‘The Entrepreneurial University in Various Triple Helix Models’, Singapore Triple Helix VI Conference, accessible online.
Google Scholar
FELDMAN, M. P. (2003), ‘Entrepreneurship and American Research Universities. Evolution in Technology Transfer’, [in:] HART, D. M. (ed.), The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy. Governance, Start ups, and Growth in the US Knowledge Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
FELDMAN, M. and DESROCHERS, P. (2003), ‘Research Universities and Local Economic Development: Lessons from the History of the Johns Hopkins University’, Industry and Innovation, 10(1), pp. 5-24.
Google Scholar
FORAY, D. (2000), L'economie de la connaissance, Paris: La Decouverte.
Google Scholar
GERTLER, M. S. and VINODRAI, T. (2004), ‘Anchors of Creativity: How do Public Universities Create Competitive and Cohesive Communities?’, Paper presented at ‘Building Excellence: Graduate Education and Research’ Taking public Universities seriously: A conference sponsored by the University of Toronto, December.
Google Scholar
GEUNA, A. (2001), ‘The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are There Negative, Unintended Consequences?’, Journal of Economic, 35(3).
Google Scholar
GIBBONS, M., LIMOGES, C. and NOWOTNY, H. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
Google Scholar
GUNASEKARA, C. (2006), ‘Reframing the Role of Universities in the Development of Regional Innovation Systems’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 pp. 101-113.
Google Scholar
HALL, P. (1998), Cities in Civilization. Culture, Innovation and Urban Order, London: Weinfeld and Nicholson.
Google Scholar
HESSELS, L. K. and Van LENTE, H. (2008), ‘Rethinking New Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda’, Research Policy, 37 pp. 740-760.
Google Scholar
HILL, K. (2006), Universities in the US National Innovation System, Arizona State University, March, accessible online.
Google Scholar
ITTELSON, T. and NELSEN, L. (2002), ‘Business Incubation and Startup’, Nature Biotechnology, 20 accessible online.
Google Scholar
LESLIE, S. (2001), ‘Regional Disadvantage. Replicating Silicon Valley in New York's Capital Region’, Technology and Culture, 42, (2).
Google Scholar
LEVINE, M. A. (1987), ‘Dowtown Redevelopment as an Urban Growth Strategy: A Critical Reappraisal of the Baltimore Renaissance’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 9, pp. 103-124.
Google Scholar
MALMBERG, A., SOLVELL, O. and ZANDER, I. (1996), Spatial Clustering, Local Accumulation of Knowledge and Firm Competitiveness, Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, 78, (2) pp. 85-97.
Google Scholar
MARSHALL, A. (1916), Principles of economics, London: MacMillan.
Google Scholar
MORGAN, K. (1997), ‘The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal’, Regional Studies, 31, (5) pp. 491-503.
Google Scholar
NELSEN, L. (2005), ‘The Role of Research Institutions in the Formation of the Biotech Cluster in Massachusetts: The MIT Experience’, Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 11 (4), pp. 330-336.
Google Scholar
NELSON, R. (1993), National Systems of Innovation. A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
NOWOTNY, H., SCOTT, P. and GIBBONS, M. (2001), Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, London: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
PERRY, D. C. and WIEWEL, W. (eds), The University as Urban Developer: Case Studies and Analysis, M. E. Sharpe, Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Google Scholar
POMA, L. and RAMACIOTTI, L. (2008), ‘La valorizzazione della ricerca universitaria mediante l'interpolazine dei saperi. Infrastrutture materiali ed immateriali’, L'Industria, 29, numero speciale.
Google Scholar
POWELL, W. W. and SNELLMAN, K. (2004), ‘The Knowledge Economy’, Annual Review of Sociology, 30, pp. 199-220.
Google Scholar
SACCHETTI, S. and SUGDEN, R. (2005), ‘Mental Proximity: Identifying Networks of Mutual Dependence’ [in:] THEURL T. (ed.), Strategies for Cooperation, Shaker Aachen.
Google Scholar
SAXENIAN, A. L. (1994), Regional Advantages. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
SCHUMPETER, J. (1911), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, [1982].
Google Scholar
TEECE, D. (1985), ‘Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy’, Research Policy, 15, pp. 285-305.
Google Scholar
YOUTIE, J. and SHAPIRA, P. (2008), ‘Building an Innovation Hub: A Case of the Transformation of University Roles in Regional Technological and Economic Development’, Research Policy, 37 (8), pp. 1188-1204.
Google Scholar
WRIGHT, M., CLARYSSE, B., LOCKETT, A. and KNOCKART, M. (2008), ‘"Mid-range Universities" Linkages with Industry: Knowledge Types and the Role of Intermediaries’, Research Policy, 37, pp. 1205-1223.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.