Adoption of Technology and Regional Convergence in Europe

Stilianos Alexiadis; George M. Korres

doi:10.2478/s10105-010-0012-6

Authors

Stilianos Alexiadis Department of Economics, University of Piraeus, Greece
George M. Korres Department of Geography, University of the Aegean, University Hill, Mitilene, Greece

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/s10105-010-0012-6

Keywords:

technological catch-up, regional convergence, European regions

Abstract

This paper examines the pattern of convergence in labour productivity across regions due to their ability to adopt technology. Whether regions exhibit a pattern of convergence depends on the degree to which infrastructure conditions are appropriate for the adoption of technological improvements. The ability of a region to adopt or create technology is reflected in the percentage of its labour force employed in technologically dynamic sectors or, more generally, in the resources devoted to science and technology. A high percentage of labour employed in technologically advanced sectors leads a region to a pattern of convergence. This hypothesis is tested using data for the NUTS-2 regions of the EU-27 during the time period 1995-2006. The results suggest that adoption of technology has a significant and positive effect on regional convergence in Europe. The analysis is also shown to have important implications for the direction of regional policy in Europe. To be more specific, regional policies, in order to enhance regional growth and convergence, should encourage employment in advanced technological sectors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALEXIADIS, S. (2009), ‘A Model of Regional Convergence with Technology Adoption’, [in:] PAPADOURAKIS, G. and LAZARIDIS, I. (eds), New Horizons in Industry, Business and Education, Santorini, pp. 492-498.
Google Scholar

ALEXIADIS, S. (2010), ‘Regional Convergence Clubs and Dynamic Externalities’, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 9 (1), pp. 41-64.
Google Scholar

ALEXIADIS, S. and KORRES, G. (2009), ‘Technology Adoption and Spatial Interaction: Evidence from the European Regions’, [in:] MARKOWSKI, T., TURAŁA, M. and ŻUBER, P. (eds), Innovation and Space - European and National Approach, Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences, pp. 24-42.
Google Scholar

ABRAMOVITZ, M. (1986), ‘Catching up, Forging Ahead and Falling Behind’, Journal of Economic History, 46 (2), pp. 385-406.
Google Scholar

BERNARD, A. and JONES, C. (1996), ‘Technology and Convergence’, Economic Journal, 106 (437), pp. 1037-1044.
Google Scholar

BOLDRIN, M. and CANOVA, F. (2001), ‘Inequality and Convergence in Europe's Regions: Reconsidering European Regional Policies’, Economic Policy, 16 (32), pp. 207-253.
Google Scholar

BUTTON, K. and PENTECOST, E. (1995), ‘Testing for Convergence of the EU Regional Economies’, Economic Inquiry, 33 (4), pp. 664-671.
Google Scholar

DURLAUF, S. and QUAH, D. (1999), ‘The New Empirics of Economic Growth’, [in:] TAYLOR, J. and WOODFORD, M. (eds), Handbook of Macroeconomics, 1, Amsterdam Elsevier, pp. 235-308.
Google Scholar

ERTUR, C. and KOCH, W. (2005), ‘Une analyse exploratoire des disparités régionales dans l'Europe élargie’, Région et Développement, 21, pp. 65-92.
Google Scholar

EZCURRA, R., GIL, C. and PASCUAL, P. (2005), ‘Regional Welfare Disparities: The Case of the European Regions’, Applied Economics, 37 (12), pp. 1423-1437.
Google Scholar

FISCHER, M. and STIRBÖCK, C. (2006), ‘Pan-European Regional Income Growth and Club Convergence’, Annals of Regional Science, 40, pp. 693-721.
Google Scholar

FUNKE, M. and STRULIK, H. (1999), ‘Regional Growth in West Germany: Convergence or Divergence’, Economic Modelling, 16 (4), pp. 489-502.
Google Scholar

MARTIN, R. (2001), ‘EMU versus the Regions? Regional Convergence and Divergence in Euroland’, Journal of Economic Geography, 1 (1), pp. 51-80.
Google Scholar

NEVEN, D. and GOUYETTE, C. (1995), ‘Regional Convergence in the European Community’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 33 (1), pp. 47-65.
Google Scholar